Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

tTg 14 a year and a half ago, 21 this year. Awaiting biopsy results but GI said everything looked normal..


valeRD

Recommended Posts

valeRD Newbie

I do not have typical celiac disease symptoms. No diarrhea (generally), no anemia....I do have frequent constipation, abdominal pain, distension and awful flatulence. Comes and goes, and I cant associate it to any foods, even though SIBO and lactose intolerance also came back positive. Was diagnosed with osteoporosis at 30, but it got better with calcium supplements. My father is extremely lactose intolerant, but has immediate diarrhea following ingestion. Now that GI says everything looked normal I am concerned I am not going to get a clear diagnosis. And, honestly, where I live (not in the US), being lactose free is harder than gluten free if I am diagnosed as Lactose intolerant.....

 

Gastroenterologist was very confident that biopsies will not show celiac disease...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



valeRD Newbie

Anyone?? What are the chances I am celiac disease if my endoscopy looked extremely normal? What are the chances all my tests were false positive (tTg 21, + lactose intolerance, + SIBO) and i end up with no diagnosis? 

cyclinglady Grand Master

My visual on my endoscopy was normal.  You have to wait for the pathologist’s report.  Besides the TTG, did you run other tests?  The TTG can be slightly elevated for other illnesses like Crohn’s.  

A lactose intolerant can be a result of celiac disease or you could be genetically predisposed.  A huge chunk of the world’s population is genetically lactose intolerant.  

valeRD Newbie

Thanks for your response...if I had crohns I would have diarrhea right?? The weird thing about the lactose intolerance test is that even though it came back positive, sometimes I eat foods with very high lactose content and experience no abdominal issues...nothing makes sense to me

cyclinglady Grand Master

Just be patient, hard I know!  ?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.