Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Does A Weak Positive Ttga Mean?

roses8

Recommended Posts

roses8 Newbie
roses8
Posted

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone knows what it means to have a weak positive TTGA (tissue transglutamine level? I have had two consecutive weak positive results. What is the likelihood that someone with a weak positive result is actually a true celiac? I have had persistent gas and bloating, and lactose intolerance. My doctor says a biopsy is the next step, but that seems a bit drastic.

Actually, I am confused about the research that I have read because; usually there are lots of references to the presence of these ttga auto antibodies, as being a strong indication of celiac. But if that is true, why are there any normal levels of these antibodies, do most people have a small amount of them, or not? And if normal people have them, what are they for?

Thanks for any insight into this,

Roses

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted

A positive tTG (even a weak positive) is indicative of Celiac. The next logical step would be to have the biopsy or begin the diet. If the biopsy is negative you could still have Celiac as the biopsy can't rule OUT celiac. If its positive then there are no doubts about it. The biopsy is no big deal...its totally pain-free. I'm pretty sure its best to have no tTG present but if its higher than what is considered to be the "normal" range then this indicates that damage is occurring due to gluten consumption.

key Contributor
key
Posted

I had a weak positive too, but I had been on the gluten-free diet for two months already. I was feeling better and didn't wish to start eating gluten again for a biopsy. I would recommend you have the biopsy. My GI told me I probably had Celiac (my son has it too) and to follow the diet. My level was two points below the abnormal. He said most people that don't have it, would have a number of Zero. My other son got tested and his number was zero, plus all his other celiac panel levels were normal.

The biopsy is painless so they say and I sort of wish I had had it done, but not willing to make myself sick again to have it done.

Monica

jnclelland Contributor
jnclelland
Posted
He said most people that don't have it, would have a number of Zero.

Really? I had this test done after 6 weeks off wheat, and my numbers were 3.8 IGA/3.9 IGG, with "normal" being anything less than 20. I assumed that this was a definitive negative - not too surprising since I had been off wheat for 6 weeks. But I *was* still eating barley and rye at the time, and I've been trying to find out if a test done at that point could yield any useful information at all. It would be nice to have something in the way of useful test results, but no way am I going back on gluten just for that!

Jeanne

roses8 Newbie
roses8
Posted
  • Author

Jeanne,

That was my understanding too, that anything less than 20 was negative, and that anything over twenty is suspect. But, I don't know whether most "normal" people have numbers that are close to twenty, or not.

My numbers for TTGA were in the low mid twenties. I have heard that most celiacs not on the diet have much higher numbers than that, but I'm not sure.

It is very confusing. Does anyone else remember their pre-diagnosis antibody level ?

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted

My TTG antibody level at my doctor's office was only 10.5 and they found moderate damage when they did the endoscopy...weird?

Jeanne,

That was my understanding too, that anything less than 20 was negative, and that anything over twenty is suspect. But, I don't know whether most "normal" people have numbers that are close to twenty, or not.

My numbers for TTGA were in the low mid twenties. I have heard that most celiacs not on the diet have much higher numbers than that, but I'm not sure.

It is very confusing. Does anyone else remember their pre-diagnosis antibody level ?

ryebaby0 Enthusiast
ryebaby0
Posted

My son's pre-dx Ttg was 152, after 3 months gluten-free it was 75, and after 20 months it was 8.

My husband's Ttg was 24, a "weak positive" and his GI wanted to scope him. My son's peds GI said that in her opinion, there's no such thing as a weak positive -- non-celiacs are clearly negative, celiacs (silent ones included) are positive or weakly positive. He opted not to have a biopsy, on the grounds that it could easily miss a damaged spot, come back negative, and he'd be misdiagnosed.

So he went gluten-free, has never felt better in his whole life. Has not yet been re-tested

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


floridanative Community Regular
floridanative
Posted

Sorry to add to the confusion but my tTg was only a 10 in Sept. (doc said probably have Celiac) and only a 7 in Nov. (2nd doc said no way I have Celiac) so I went to a 3rd doc to break the tie. He looked at both test result labs and said my number wa coming down, not going up, so I don't have it. Insisted on a biopsy b/c other 2 docs said I needed it. 3rd doc called last Monday to say my results show classic Celiac Sprue. Also on my lab pages it clearly states 5-9 is weak positive and 10+ is positive but apparently every lab is different. No wonder everyone is so confused about this condition.

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted

Good for you, floridanative - I'm glad you were diagnosed solidly sprue and that you pursued it. Funny how doctors are...

Sorry to add to the confusion but my tTg was only a 10 in Sept. (doc said probably have Celiac) and only a 7 in Nov. (2nd doc said no way I have Celiac) so I went to a 3rd doc to break the tie. He looked at both test result labs and said my number wa coming down, not going up, so I don't have it. Insisted on a biopsy b/c other 2 docs said I needed it. 3rd doc called last Monday to say my results show classic Celiac Sprue. Also on my lab pages it clearly states 5-9 is weak positive and 10+ is positive but apparently every lab is different. No wonder everyone is so confused about this condition.
SueC Explorer
SueC
Posted

Please be careful when looking at the numbers. Different labs have different values for negative and positive. It all depends on where your bloodwork is sent. The lab should provide the doctor with thier specific normal and abnormal ranges.

floridanative Community Regular
floridanative
Posted

Thanks AmandaD. When I think back at how I had to trick the doc into doing the biopsy by saying that I'd just go back to the first GI and get him to do it, I realized that if someone less headstrong than I had been sitting in his office, they would have left happily with the untrue knowledge that they didnt' have Celiac and continued to get sicker. Once he called last week I realized why he would not look me in the eyes after the endo. I'm sure he saw the damage but would not mention it to me since he basically treated me like a hypochondriac in his office 10 days before. Nice!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.