Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Will my blood test for celiac and biopsy (during endoscopy) still be accurate please? I am new to this. Thanks


Sotorp

Recommended Posts

Sotorp Newbie

Hello,
This is my story:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Microbiome/comments/kdwm66/have_severe_symptoms_severe/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

So,it has been 3 weeks since start of the severe symptoms.
They started since 7.12. Till 14.12 I have been eating  normal bad gluten diet. Since 14.12 to maybe 25.12 I have been eating only very light diet, gluten free and have been feeling mostly better.
Since 25.12 I have been adding new foods (but still eating mostly light gluten free diet), little by little, and trying which makes me feel worse and what does not.
I have felt bad/worse after eating normal bread, spelt bread, and homemade bread made from buckwheat and yeast. But also from beef steak where I added soya sauce.
I think it is either SIBO or Celiac disease.

My question is, since I have been MOSTLY Gluten Free for 3 weeks, and for past week have been trying here and there some new foods,which some have had some gluten in it.. question is:
1. If I went for celiac blood test now, would tests still be accurate? Is 3 weeks enough to heal intestinal damage/make antibodies disappear ? Hope the test would still be as accurate as before.
2. If I went to have endoscopy done now, for biopsy, would it too still be accurate? Or endoscopy does not need me to eat gluten before it?

I have endoscopy on 11.1 (planning to start eating 2 slices of gluten bread every day starting from tommorow), and blood test sometime within january, perhaps after 15.1, will I still have accurate tests?
I have been gluten free for a pretty short time.

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
GliadinX
NutHouse! Granola Co.



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Smith & Truslow


trents Grand Master

It is more likely that the short period of gluten reduction will not have much impact on the endoscopy/biospy than the blood test, IMO. So I'm guessing that if you have celiac disease the blood tests may not give a strong positive but the biopsy will still show damaged villi.

Sotorp Newbie
32 minutes ago, trents said:

It is more likely that the short period of gluten reduction will not have much impact on the endoscopy/biospy than the blood test, IMO. So I'm guessing that if you have celiac disease the blood tests may not give a strong positive but the biopsy will still show damaged villi.

In your opinion, is it safe in terms of test accuracy to take Pancreolan while eating gluten foods? 

Not sure if you have it in your country, these are basically pancreatic enzymes that help with digestion.

I am afraid of having severe symptoms again, I am hoping that this would help lessen symptoms before I have biopsy and blood test.

trents Grand Master
(edited)

I think we have similar things in the USA. I would not think the pancreolan would affect the test results. I am not a doctor, however, so this is lay person opinion.

Edited by trents
Scott Adams Grand Master

Technically speaking you risk false negative celiac disease results if you’ve been gluten-free in the weeks leading up to the tests. If your results are negative you could not rule out celiac disease, which, I presume, is one reason why you’re getting the tests in the first place.

DJFL77I Experienced

no.. it will take many months for antibody to go to 0...  unless yours are very low to begin with...    like if they're only 12 at diagnosis......   that might drop to 0 in a month ?

Scott Adams Grand Master

Maybe, but such results might lead to a doctor telling you it’s not celiac disease “because you’re under 20,” which would be a false conclusion.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Holidaily Brewing Co.
Food for Life



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Little Northern Bakehouse


DJFL77I Experienced

mine was 13 when i had it tested in Nov after 5 months..   the lab still said its high...  0 - 3 normal

Scott Adams Grand Master

The number I used, 20, was pulled out of thin air, but the idea is that @Sotorp will have a lower reading than if they were eating gluten daily until the testing was concluded. If the cut off for celiac disease was 10 on a test and they score 7, but were gluten-free for a time before the test, what exactly will that tell you? Many doctors would tell them that they don't have celiac disease and can keep eating gluten. I think what I'm trying to say is that it's very important not to go gluten-free before testing, and if this somehow happens then you can't really read too much into the results. 

docaz Collaborator

Since you went gluten-free only a short time ago, it might make sense to go back now on gluten and to discuss with your doctor how soon you can schedule the blood tests and biopsy. If you go completely guten-free and then need to start a gluten-challenge again, that might require you to go through agony for a long time. Pancreolan appear pancreatic enzyme supplements and these do not affect gluten. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,599
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jose Mojena
    Newest Member
    Jose Mojena
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    GliadinX


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...