Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Gluten Challenge Challenge


Neko1216

Recommended Posts

Neko1216 Newbie

Hello

I've just joined these forums and I’m definitely new to all things gluten minded and celiac. I’ve had a myriad of symptoms for years that have gotten worse that a previous doctor would just throw meds at. I was getting so miserable I finally decided to find a new doctor and see what I could find out. At my new patient visit, after explaining all my symptoms he sent me for a wide range of blood tests, including a few to test for celiac. I ended up testing positive. 
I got a referral to a gastroenterologist but the wait was two months so it was suggested I go gluten-free in that time to see how I would feel. After two weeks it was like I had finally woken up, the pains were going away, the headed were less and less- it was amazing. Then came my GI visit. I was told due to going gluten-free I would have to reintroduce gluten in a big way prior to getting and endoscopy. Gluten rich, as much as I can, to “make my body mad”. I was told eight weeks. 
So here I am. Six weeks in. I feel so much worse than I ever did and I don’t know what to do. I am feeling so sick there are some times I just have to lay down and curl up in a ball.  I’m not doing permanent damage, right? How did anyone else do a gluten challenge? Is there anything I can do to make this easier? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Welcome to the forum, Neko1216!

You are in the same difficult spot that many are in whose physicians neglect to or don't know enough to tell them that going gluten-free before testing sabotages the tests.

But do you really need then endoscopy/biopsy? Seems like you have all the evidence you need by the improvement in your health and sense of well-being. And whether or not you are gluten sensitive or have celiac disease, the antidote is the same, complete avoidance of gluten.

Having said that, some people seem to need the confirmation of the endoscopy/biopsy in order to stay on trach with their gluten-free diet and not cheat by rationalizing it away.

The question about permanent damage is a tricky one to answer. Most likely, the small bowel villi will recover if you keep eating gluten until the scoping and then commit to totally gluten-free lifestyle. But it is also true that the longer you consume gluten the higher is the chance that collateral damage might be done to the immune system because of "leaky gut" syndrome from the small bowel inflammation. But my best guess is it won't make much difference long term if you stay on gluten for another two weeks.

Edited by trents
Neko1216 Newbie
8 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, Neko1216!

You are in the same difficult spot that many are in whose physicians neglect to or don't know enough to tell them that going gluten-free before testing sabotages the tests.

But do you really need then endoscopy/biopsy? Seems like you have all the evidence you need by the improvement in your health and sense of well-being. And whether or not you are gluten sensitive or have celiac disease, the antidote is the same, complete avoidance of gluten.

Having said that, some people seem to need the confirmation of the endoscopy/biopsy in order to stay on trach with their gluten-free diet and not cheat by rationalizing it away.

The question about permanent damage is a tricky one to answer. Most likely, the small bowel villi will recover if you keep eating gluten until the scoping and then commit to totally gluten-free lifestyle. But it is also true that the longer you consume gluten the higher is the chance that collateral damage might be done to the immune system because of "leaky gut" syndrome from the small bowel inflammation. But my best guess is it won't make much difference long term if you stay on gluten for another two weeks.

Thanks for your reply. It did seem like the rational next step in testing when it was first explained but yes, in retrospect it does not seem as necessary... 

I like hearing there probably won’t be long term damage. It helps when I have the mental debate with myself to keep going with this. 

GFinDC Veteran
1 hour ago, Neko1216 said:

Hello

I've just joined these forums and I’m definitely new to all things gluten minded and celiac. I’ve had a myriad of symptoms for years that have gotten worse that a previous doctor would just throw meds at. I was getting so miserable I finally decided to find a new doctor and see what I could find out. At my new patient visit, after explaining all my symptoms he sent me for a wide range of blood tests, including a few to test for celiac. I ended up testing positive. 
I got a referral to a gastroenterologist but the wait was two months so it was suggested I go gluten-free in that time to see how I would feel. After two weeks it was like I had finally woken up, the pains were going away, the headed were less and less- it was amazing. Then came my GI visit. I was told due to going gluten-free I would have to reintroduce gluten in a big way prior to getting and endoscopy. Gluten rich, as much as I can, to “make my body mad”. I was told eight weeks. 
So here I am. Six weeks in. I feel so much worse than I ever did and I don’t know what to do. I am feeling so sick there are some times I just have to lay down and curl up in a ball.  I’m not doing permanent damage, right? How did anyone else do a gluten challenge? Is there anything I can do to make this easier? 

The endoscopy gluten challenge is 2 weeks, the blood antibodies gluten challenge is 12 weeks.  Sometimes they say 8 weeks though.  So if you have been eating gluten for 6 weeks you are more than ready for the endoscopy.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Since you had a positive blood test (and feel free if you'd like to share those results with us), AND your long-standing symptoms went away on a gluten-free diet, AND have come back with a vengeance on your current gluten challenge, all of this together would be enough for me, but I'm not your doctor. 

Most people need the formal diagnosis to stay on a 100% GFD for life, which can be hard to do unless they know for sure. In your case it sounds like you won't have a hard time staying on the diet no matter what the biopsy indicates (yes, it's possible it won't confirm celiac disease). There are benefits of getting a diagnosis, like receiving follow up care, but I've never received any without pushing my doctors for it. There are also drawbacks like higher and harder to get life and/or health insurance.

Above all, you're responsible for making decisions about your own health, so whatever you decide is ok.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,189
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...