Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Abilyn's ice cream cakes gluten free?


dcubed

Recommended Posts

dcubed Newbie

There is an ice cream cake manufacturer called Abilyn's that labels their cakes "gluten free", here and front and center on the box label: https://www.abilyns.com/every-day-celebrations.

However in the nutrition section they note that the equipment they use also processes wheat: https://www.abilyns.com/cookies-cream

I emailed them asking about this and their response:

"Thank you for reaching out and for your interest in our products.  We claim our ingredients as gluten free and acknowledge that the production facility we use does process other products containing wheat.   That said, our ice cream cakes (gluten and nut free) are the only item produced on the production line (used to produce our ice cream cakes) on the days our product is run.  The lines are thoroughly cleaned prior to our run and, as stated, only our ice cream cakes are produced on that line on that day.

Our products are produced in a facility that is SQF (Safe Quality Food) certified, a certification which requires strict adherence to thorough cleaning and sanitation processes.  That said, as we proclaim on our packaging, other items containing wheat and peanuts are produced in the facility and on the line where our ice cream cakes are produced.  

So to your question about the possibility of cross contamination, certainly a risk exists, but as you can see, there are a lot of procedures in place to minimize this risk.  I hope this helps."

I followed up asking if they test their cakes to less than 20ppm, which I believe is required to use the gluten free label. I have not heard back from them.

Can a food be officially gluten free and also be manufactured on a line that processes wheat? I bought one of their cakes based on the gluten-free label but then didn't eat due to the wheat cross-contamination risk.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

It's all in the definition of "gluten free." The FDA allows food products to be labeled "gluten free" as long as they contain no more than 20ppm of gluten. Food companies that label their products "certified gluten free" have met a stricter standard of 10ppm. The history of the numbers is that at some point in the last 20-25 years the FDA determined that 20 ppm was the threshold of safety for those suffering from celiac disease and non celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Since then we have come to realize that 20ppm may be fine for a lot of celiacs but there are some who are more sensitive and still get a gluten reaction from that amount.

As far as the ice cream sandwich product you reference, it sounds like the company behind it has been very upfront about their use of the label "gluten free" and the potential risks involved for more sensitive celiacs for consuming this product. You won't know if it's safe for you until you try it.

RMJ Mentor

The FDA regulations are very strange in that manufacturers do NOT have to test foods to label them gluten free.

See item 2 under “Compliance.”

FDA gluten free labeling FAQs

trents Grand Master
(edited)

That's good information, RMJ. So, my paraphrase of that would be that the food companies may use the "gluten free" label without proof that they meet the 20ppm standard unless the FDA chooses to test their product and finds otherwise. And this isn't likely to happen unless there are consumer complaints that suggest the standard isn't being met. And that, "Certified Gluten Free" means the food company has engaged one of the certifying bodies to have their product tested. 

Edited by trents
dcubed Newbie

Very interesting indeed. And even if the FDA chose to test odds are very high that the cakes would pass, as the company seems to go as far as they can to mitigate cross-contamination.

Nevertheless I don't like that the gluten-free label is not actually verified through FDA (or even internal) testing. I know many sensitive celiacs can instantly detect a reaction to gluten, but I am in this nebulous realm where I never know if symptoms are gluten related or not (and what the source of the gluten was). As such, I would never be able to complain to the FDA about potential gluten content in a product. 



 

Scott Adams Grand Master

Although companies are not required to test products they label "gluten-free," they are responsible if such items go above 20ppm, and it can result in a very expensive product recall should this happen. I've not heard of a company that didn't test their products regularly if they use "gluten-free" on their label, but I suppose it's possible, especially if their product is naturally gluten-free with very little risk of cross contamination (for example a salsa made in a gluten-free facility, where their spice suppliers guarantee they are GF).

The FDA generally only responds to complaints, but does do random testing sometimes, but can't test every food that makes various health claims, which would be impossible for them to do. This older article shows that most companies using this on their labels were in compliance when they did random testing:

 

RMJ Mentor

Even those who achieve gluten free certification from GFCO don’t have to test every single lot of finished product, although they must have an excellent record in order to reduce the testing frequency.

GFCO manual 2021 - see Testing section 6 page 20


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,022
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pesto
    Newest Member
    Pesto
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.