Jump to content

  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Birth Control Effectiveness

steph1284

Recommended Posts

steph1284 Newbie
steph1284
Posted

I have read on several sites that the effectiveness of birth control can be decreased if you have celiac disease. I have been diagnosed for over two years now and my doctor (OBGYN) has never said anything to me. She knows that I have this and has never discussed the possibility that it may reduce the effectiveness of the pill. Has anyone a conversation with their doctor in which they were given a straight answer? I have a call in to my doctor, of course, but unfortunately with my busy schedule we are playing phone tag so I thought I would try here and hope that someone had some answers. Thanks so much! This thing is amazing.....I only just discovered it and I have already learned so much!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Felidae Enthusiast
Felidae
Posted

Personally, I have been on the pill for over 10 years and I have never had any problems so to speak. It's worked great for me.

frenchiemama Collaborator
frenchiemama
Posted

If you read the package insert that comes with your pills you will see that it says you should use back up if you have a lot of vomitting or D, maybe that is the reason? I would think that once going gluten-free and healing the effectiveness would be the same as that of a non-celiac.

mookie03 Contributor
mookie03
Posted

I have discussed this with my doctor b/c i had a problem w/ absorption while on the pill and before gluten-free. Essentially it can cause problems (certainly did for me!) most likely due to the D as someone mentioned. BUT if you are on a gluten-free diet, you should be fine, i would just make sure that if you are using it for BC, use a second form (e.g. condom) during any month where you are glutened.

jenvan Collaborator
jenvan
Posted

It absolutely can be affected, if you still have villous atrophy or absorption problems and are not on a strict gluten-free diet. However, absorption should technically return to normal after the gluten-free diet (for a period of time). I switched to the nuvaring b/c of that reason (and also b/c of lower levels of hormones than oral contraceptives).

TCA Contributor
TCA
Posted

WOW! I never thought of this. I've gotten pregnant twice on the pill, but I never thought of this. I wasn't gluten-free at the time, didn't even know what celiac disease was. Now it makes sense. I thought I was just blessed with not having to plan my pregnancies. :P

natalunia Rookie
natalunia
Posted

I got on Nuvaring for 3 reasons: because of the chronic diarrhea/vomiting, because I bleed like a stuck pig during that time of the month (I use Nuvaring continuously because of the extreme bleeding), and I was forgetting to take my pills for anywhere for 1-4 days at a time (could brain fog have contributed to that?). I love the Nuvaring. It has been the best BC method for me. It's easy to put in and easy to forget it is there. I have to use the reminder stickers to remind me to put a new one in!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


jenvan Collaborator
jenvan
Posted

Natalie-

I like those stickers too :)

penguin Community Regular
penguin
Posted

Someone tell me how to convince my husband that the Nuva Ring is a good thing? I don't start it until Sunday, but he doesn't think it'll work, or that he'll feel it, or that it will fall out. I've explained it to him six ways from Sunday and he's still against it. I was thinking of putting it in a few days early and then, erm, proving he couldn't feel it, and tell him after the fact. I'm switching from Kariva, so I don't have to use a backup.

You know the irony of him not thinking the little plastic ring that gives off medication through the skin? His area of research is POLYMERS AND DRUG DELIVERY!!! He studies how medicines get in and out of plastic. :rolleyes: I thought he'd think it was pretty cool. :unsure:

Guest Robbin
Guest Robbin
Posted
Someone tell me how to convince my husband that the Nuva Ring is a good thing? I don't start it until Sunday, but he doesn't think it'll work, or that he'll feel it, or that it will fall out. I've explained it to him six ways from Sunday and he's still against it. I was thinking of putting it in a few days early and then, erm, proving he couldn't feel it, and tell him after the fact. I'm switching from Kariva, so I don't have to use a backup.

You know the irony of him not thinking the little plastic ring that gives off medication through the skin? His area of research is POLYMERS AND DRUG DELIVERY!!! He studies how medicines get in and out of plastic. :rolleyes: I thought he'd think it was pretty cool. :unsure:

Chelse-In men, the worries over certain bodily functions take over brain cell activity. :blink:

jenvan Collaborator
jenvan
Posted

First off, remind him its your body :) And that it is no biggie. I have several friends who use it and all of them, including myself, have no issues with the ring and sex. Don't notice it on either end... :) It may take a few times to figure out how you are putting it in, but it stays in there pretty darn good... Good luck, hope everything goes smoothly!! I love it...

eleep Enthusiast
eleep
Posted

This sounds interesting -- the thing I'm concerned about with the ring is whether it could increase my chances of getting regular UTI's -- which the diaphragm definitely did (I HATED the diaphragm) -- anyone got any experience with this?

jenvan Collaborator
jenvan
Posted
This sounds interesting -- the thing I'm concerned about with the ring is whether it could increase my chances of getting regular UTI's -- which the diaphragm definitely did (I HATED the diaphragm) -- anyone got any experience with this?

I haven't heard of that issue with the nuvaring. Not sure why the diaphragm would--perhaps transfer of bacteria?? Anywho, I do not think the nuvaring should cause that problem for you. There is a 'risk' of vaginal infections, but I don't know anyone who has had any issue using it.

natalunia Rookie
natalunia
Posted

I've had no increase in UTI, hubby definitely can't feel it, and I say go for it putting it in a few days early to prove your point.

My doctor told me the hormones are released at the normal rate for 35 days, then fade greatly after that point. He instructed me to wear it for every 33-35 days then change it out. I don't have a period because of that. If I do choose to have a period, mine are always 9-14 days (on any BC or not), so that is why we do the continual hormones. My endometriosis seems to be in check now with this method.

eleep Enthusiast
eleep
Posted
I haven't heard of that issue with the nuvaring. Not sure why the diaphragm would--perhaps transfer of bacteria?? Anywho, I do not think the nuvaring should cause that problem for you. There is a 'risk' of vaginal infections, but I don't know anyone who has had any issue using it.

The diaphragm has to be inserted every time you have intercourse -- with a dollop of spermacidal jelly -- the jelly has to be reapplied with a plunger-thing if you're going to have intercourse more than once -- and the whole thing has to stay in for two hours afterwards. I always tried to be very careful with handwashing and disinfecting of diaphragm and plunger-thing, but inevitably I'd get a UTI every other month or so.

It was a mess -- and I think I'm the only one among my cohort of friends who's ever used one (I'd had a severely bad reaction to OrthoNovum 777 which scared me off of the pill during a two-year relationship) -- when the mini-pill came out, I switched over and I've never looked back since. However, I'm intrigued by this ring and the new IUD.

jenvan Collaborator
jenvan
Posted

Erica-

Yeah, that kind of bacteria transfer was my one guess.... Perhaps the diaphragm materials were just irritating to you also.... I think the nuvaring would definitely be worth a try!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Wheatwacked
      - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Coeliac or not coeliac

      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives. An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis o...
    2. Wheatwacked
      - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

      In Addison’s disease, autoimmmune adrenal cortex disease adrenal glands don't make enough cortisol. At 12, it is usually caused by an autoimmune attack. It has a strong genetic link to the HLA-DQ8 gene. After 12 gluten free and 14 years on prednisone for adrenal insufficiency (symptoms like you describe from 1984 until 2014) I recently removed all c...
    3. trents
      - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Coeliac or not coeliac

      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    4. cristiana
      - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Coeliac or not coeliac

      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal. My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut...
    5. trents
      - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Coeliac or not coeliac

      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,186
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Newest Member
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Coeliac or not coeliac

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Coeliac or not coeliac

      By trents · Posted

      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Coeliac or not coeliac

      By cristiana · Posted

      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
    • trents
      Coeliac or not coeliac

      By trents · Posted

      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful, especially when the test results are marginal. But a result of 87.4 is probably out of the normal range and into the positive range for any lab's scale. But back to the question of why your endoscopy/biopsy didn't show damage despite significantly positive TTG. Because they took the trouble to take seven samples, it is not likely they missed damage because of it being patchy. The other possibility is that there hasn't been time for the damage to show up. How long have you been experiencing the symptoms you describe in your first post? Having said all that, there are other medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA values and sometimes they are transient issues. I think it would be wise to ask for another TTG-IGA before the repeat endoscopy to see if it is still high.  Knitty kitty's suggestion of getting genetic testing done is also something to think about. About 35% of the general population will have one or both genes that are markers for the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop celiac disease. So, having a celiac potential gene cannot be used to definitively diagnose celiac disease but it can be realistically used to rule it out if you don't have either of the genes. If your symptoms persist, and all testing is complete and the follow-up endoscopy/biopsy still shows no damage, you should consider trialing a gluten free diet for a few months to see if symptoms improve. If not celiac disease, you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). 
    • knitty kitty
      Coeliac or not coeliac

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @CC90, Your Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor and has immunosuppressive effects!!!!  This is why your endoscopy didn't show much damage to the intestinal lining!!  The Lansolprazole is suppressing tTg IgA antibodies in the intestines, but those antibodies are getting into the blood stream and causing inflammation and damage in other organs.   Proton pump inhibitors cause intestinal damage in the long run.  If you get off the Lansoprazole for a few months so your immune system is not blocked, then do a gluten challenge, and an endoscopy, THEN they would see intestinal damage. Sheesh!  Doctors can be so ignorant.  I've seen this so many times it's frustrating! Take the B Complex and Benfotiamine.  Get off the Lansoprazole.  Go with the DNA test results.   Welcome to the tribe! P.S. B vitamins are needed to correct anemia!  Not just iron.  
×
×
  • Create New...