Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It An Allergy?


Moongirl

Recommended Posts

Moongirl Community Regular

I know that we all have some other type of allergy, but when you guys talk about allergies, do you mean an oral allergy, where ur throat itches and your tongue swells, or do you mean ur stomach/intestinal tract doesnt agree with you.

Cause Ive been reading some things, and i get confused sometimes when people say "allergies" I feel like sometimes they should be saying "intolerances"


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rachel--24 Collaborator

Basically if the reaction is immediate, happens everytime the offending food is consumed with obvious allergic type symptoms (i.e. swelling, rashes, etc) and is positive in an IgE food allergy test then its an allergy. An intolerance is usually delayed reaction, symptoms vary, reactions are often dose related, triggering foods are often difficult to identify and results for IgE "allergies" are negative. Intolerances involve IgG or IgA antibodies. IgG Intolerances can often go away with avoidance of the offending food (unless its gluten)....true allergies generally are "fixed" and do not go away even if you avoid the food.

flagbabyds Collaborator

I have both allergies and intolerances. They are differnt, and most people know if they have an allergy or intolerance, becasue it is easy to tell apart.

cornbread Explorer

I read a summary that said the difference is that allergies are an immune reaction and intolerances are not (ie: lactose intolerance is due to a lack of the lactase enzyme, not an immune response). However... wouldn't that make gluten intolerance an allergy, rather than an intolerance? Our reaction to gluten certainly involves the immune system, and it's a lot more serious than lactose intolerance.

Also, there's a 3rd thing to add to the confusion - food sensitivities (IgG). I believe THESE are dose-dependent, and they're also reversible. Whereas classic allergies (anaphylactic types) and the gluten thing are NOT reversible. So wouldn't that make it a true allergy also? Our problem with gluten is nearer to the life-death problem IgE anaphylactic allergic people have to deal with than it is to lactose intolerance!

In addition, for me (and a lot of you too, I know), my reaction to gluten is not dose dependent at all - I can get just as sick from licking an envelope as I can from drinking a beer.

I prefer to refer to my condition as an allergy - I find it helps people understand the seriousness of it (ie: a tiny bit DOES matter), and also that this is a life long permanent thing, not a passing sensitivity or a digestive problem like lactose intolerance. I appreciate of course that it's not a classic allergy, that if I do accidentally consume gluten I won't actually die right there at the restaurant, but for the sake of dealing with waitstaff etc. I find "allergy" makes their ears prick up, and helps them take the cross-contamination issue more seriously. (Usually!)

Carriefaith Enthusiast

Allergies can be immediately life threatening; however, intolerances are not immediately life threatening. A lot of the symptoms of allergies can be quite similar to intolerance symptoms, so many people can get confused. Some allergy symptoms can include a swelling throat, hives, rash, and heart problems.

Rachel--24 Collaborator

The immune response you get from gluten is completely different from that of an allergy. Celiac Disease is autoimmune....allergies are not. I think its easier for people to understand the terminology when you refer to it as an "allergy" but whats going on inside the body is a completely different thing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.