Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dont Know What To Do

taz sharratt

Recommended Posts

taz sharratt Enthusiast
taz sharratt
Posted

my doc has just decided that my levels in my blood test for gluten-free was not conclusiv enough,ive been gluten-free for 1 month now and had a posotiv reaction with the diet, the prob is is that my doc has now said she wants me to have a colonoscopy for a proper diagnoses, if i have this done she wants me off the gluten-free diet and eating normal so the gastro doc can see damage if im on the gluten-free diet the problem will heal itself and i wont get the diagnoses, my prob is 1 of the main syptome for\me is thrush (cronic) since ive been gluten-free its gone, the thought of going through that again i could cry, dont know what to do, do i reallly need to put myself thrpugh the procedure when i know what it is and should i come off gluten-free just to satisfy doctors and give them proof! im really upset about this!!!!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Smunkeemom Enthusiast
Smunkeemom
Posted

if you are fine being gluten free, I would just tell the doctor that. A firm diagnosis isn't going to do much for you, you will be gluten free after that right? Unless you have a really really good reason for "needing to know' or needing an "actual diagnosis" I would trust your gut and not go on gluten for a test.

Besides you have to eat a lot of gluten for like 3 months for the tests to be accurate anyway, you don't want to be sick for 3 months just to find out what you already know right?

(just my opinion)

gf2000 Newbie
gf2000
Posted

I believe the endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis. The test allows the doctor to see the condition of the villi in the small intestine. This also allows them to see anything that will need to be biopsied to check form any abnormalities due to the destruction of the villi. I believe it is necessary, as we all know that we celiacs run a higher risk of gut cancers for several years after adhering to a gluten-free diet. I was diagnosed befor the blood test was available, altho I am tested annually to make sure something isn't sneaking in and just not making me sick. I am happy to know that my villi are cancer free. I suggest the test.

Good luck.

my doc has just decided that my levels in my blood test for gluten-free was not conclusiv enough,ive been gluten-free for 1 month now and had a posotiv reaction with the diet, the prob is is that my doc has now said she wants me to have a colonoscopy for a proper diagnoses, if i have this done she wants me off the gluten-free diet and eating normal so the gastro doc can see damage if im on the gluten-free diet the problem will heal itself and i wont get the diagnoses, my prob is 1 of the main syptome for\me is thrush (cronic) since ive been gluten-free its gone, the thought of going through that again i could cry, dont know what to do, do i reallly need to put myself thrpugh the procedure when i know what it is and should i come off gluten-free just to satisfy doctors and give them proof! im really upset about this!!!!
Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

tell the Dr.s to stick it... You know that gluten is bad for you. The tests aren't going to change that. In fact, since you've been gluten-free, you could get false negative results and they won't believe you anyway. Just trust your gut, stay gluten-free, and forget the Dr. Seriously. You have to take your own health into your own hands and if you are improving on the gluten-free diet then you have your answer and you do not need to satisfy some Dr.s morbid curiosity or ignorance! LOL...

insist that the Dr. take into account your positive dietary response and that is proof enough for you and that you do not want to undergo any unnecessary testing because you will be gluten free regardless of the results because you feel so much better without gluten in your life. Tell them that positive dietary response IS a valid diagnostic tool and you want them to accept that and leave you alone! (tee hee)

I feel very strongly that the medical community relies too heavily on testing methods that are just not sensitive enough and are flawed... you can get false negatives but not false positives. If they try to tell you otherwise then they are stuck in the dark ages of diagnosing Celiac/Gluten Intolerance. Positive Dietary response is the most valid diagnostic tool, and if your blood tests were even borderline positive you have this. It's that simple. Good luck standing up for yourself, I'll be in your corner rooting you on!

I believe the endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis. The test allows the doctor to see the condition of the villi in the small intestine. This also allows them to see anything that will need to be biopsied to check form any abnormalities due to the destruction of the villi. I believe it is necessary, as we all know that we celiacs run a higher risk of gut cancers for several years after adhering to a gluten-free diet. I was diagnosed befor the blood test was available, altho I am tested annually to make sure something isn't sneaking in and just not making me sick. I am happy to know that my villi are cancer free. I suggest the test.

Good luck.

the endoscopy is fast being replaced as the gold standard, and more "experts" are beginning to recognize that the biopsy misses TOO MANY cases of Celiac. It misses it in the early stages and if the damage is only sporadic it can be missed. The blood tests are sensitive enough that if they are positive then Celiac is positive, if they are negative though, you cannot rule it out because they are not sensitive enough... therefore if it shows up, lucky you for getting a dx, but if it doesn't show up you are screwed? Positive dietary response is the most valid way of determining if you have a problem with gluten (and it's NOT ALWAYS CELIAC) and since the only cure is the diet, and when you are on the diet all of your risk factors for cancers and other issues return to that of the "normal" population, then there is no harm in just sticking with the diet and forgoing the biopsy. Besides, after being gluten-free, no matter how much gluten you consume for 3 months, you still run the risk of the damage being healed enough that it won't show on the biopsy.

Guest greengirl
Guest greengirl
Posted

Well said, Nini!! I wholeheartedly agree!

Christine

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted
Well said, Nini!! I wholeheartedly agree!

Christine

Me too!

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
I feel very strongly that the medical community relies too heavily on testing methods that are just not sensitive enough and are flawed... you can get false negatives but not false positives. If they try to tell you otherwise then they are stuck in the dark ages of diagnosing Celiac/Gluten Intolerance. Positive Dietary response is the most valid diagnostic tool, and if your blood tests were even borderline positive you have this. It's that simple. Good luck standing up for yourself, I'll be in your corner rooting you on!

the endoscopy is fast being replaced as the gold standard, and more "experts" are beginning to recognize that the biopsy misses TOO MANY cases of Celiac. It misses it in the early stages and if the damage is only sporadic it can be missed. The blood tests are sensitive enough that if they are positive then Celiac is positive, if they are negative though, you cannot rule it out because they are not sensitive enough... therefore if it shows up, lucky you for getting a dx, but if it doesn't show up you are screwed? Positive dietary response is the most valid way of determining if you have a problem with gluten (and it's NOT ALWAYS CELIAC) and since the only cure is the diet, and when you are on the diet all of your risk factors for cancers and other issues return to that of the "normal" population, then there is no harm in just sticking with the diet and forgoing the biopsy. Besides, after being gluten-free, no matter how much gluten you consume for 3 months, you still run the risk of the damage being healed enough that it won't show on the biopsy.

Nini I agree with you completely. My DD didn't want to accept her diagnosis and after she went to college she went back on gluten for a couple of weeks for another endo, her damage was just beginning when she had the first endo and had healed gluten-free. The result is I have a DD who is now poisoning herself daily because a doctor told her the first test was wrong. And there is nothing I can do about it. She insists this doctor in Boston is the 'best' there is in the country as far as celiac goes and refuses to accept that the first doctors diagnosis was valid. Despite the good resolution of all her celiac related problems she is now back to the 'it's just nerves' diagnosis. Doctors in this country don't want us to be diagnosed celiac, that would just show how incompetent they have been in diagnosing us with IBS and killing us with meds. Dietary response is the best test there is.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


eKatherine Apprentice
eKatherine
Posted
Nini I agree with you completely. My DD didn't want to accept her diagnosis and after she went to college she went back on gluten for a couple of weeks for another endo, her damage was just beginning when she had the first endo and had healed gluten-free. The result is I have a DD who is now poisoning herself daily because a doctor told her the first test was wrong. And there is nothing I can do about it. She insists this doctor in Boston is the 'best' there is in the country as far as celiac goes and refuses to accept that the first doctors diagnosis was valid. Despite the good resolution of all her celiac related problems she is now back to the 'it's just nerves' diagnosis. Doctors in this country don't want us to be diagnosed celiac, that would just show how incompetent they have been in diagnosing us with IBS and killing us with meds. Dietary response is the best test there is.

Absolutely true. How many people come here posting that they're looking for a second opinion? It doesn't mean they're looking for confirmation, it means they're looking for a different diagnosis.

Considering the state of diagnosis in this country, if you want to find a negative diagnosis, you probably can even if you are positive on all tests.

There's something about having to change your diet that people so totally resist. Some psychological component must be at work for people to say "I'd rather die than give up wheat" and mean it.

penguin Community Regular
penguin
Posted
Absolutely true. How many people come here posting that they're looking for a second opinion? It doesn't mean they're looking for confirmation, it means they're looking for a different diagnosis.

That is not always true. I'm looking for a second opinion and I'm going to be gluten-free after my endo no matter what. In my case, I was dx'ed celiac on inconclusive bloodwork and dietary response alone by my primary doctor. I decided that I needed the endo or else I would be questioning my dx until the day I died and I would have cheated a lot. That does not mean that if my endo is negative I will eat gluten, the GI said that I'm definitely gluten intolerant, it's just a matter of seeing what the damage is.

Bottom line: it's a personal decision.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

There isn't a right answer for everyone on this one. Some people need a doctor-confirmed diagnosis. If you're one of those, and your doc won't take a dietary challenge result, then going back on gluten for a biopsy may well be the right answer for you. I don't think it's the best answer in the majority of cases, but individuals need individual answers, not blanket answers.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,899
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    dcarter1682
    Newest Member
    dcarter1682
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.