Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do You Feel Better On A High/moderate Fat Or Low Fat Diet?


mle-ii

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?  

16 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

mle-ii Explorer

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?

By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

mle-ii Explorer
By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

Agreed, but in the mindset of "fat is bad" it's not. ;)

I was trying to come up with some decent numbers that see about right for most folks, perhaps I'm off.

I just read something recently on gut health and so I was curious on how the real world of folks with damaged GIs would respond to this question. That and I'm trying ever so hard not to bias the poll.

Thanks,

Mike

Ursa Major Collaborator

I feel absolutely rotten if I don't get enough saturated fat. I cook with lard, and others will often not want to eat my 'greasy' food (I can't tolerate butter or coconut oil, which I'd prefer). I need to be on a high protein, high fat, low carbohydrate diet, or I lose all energy.

dlp252 Apprentice

I feel much better on a higher fat diet, with lower carbs. I have a lot more energy overall and feel full longer with a higher fat diet.

VydorScope Proficient

Agree, Higher (good) fat, Higher Protien, lower carb = best diet in my experence. :)

plantime Contributor

Low fat diet=depression and constipation for me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

I go crazy on a low fat diet. The cravings eventually consume me and I start eating things that are way off the scale as far as fat content is cncerned. Now that I can't eat dairy anymore, I'd better keep the fat in my diet up, no cheese or chocolate mousse in my future.

tarnalberry Community Regular
By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.

Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

Sarah8793 Enthusiast

Me too. I feel best on a diet higher in fats and proteins and lower in carbs.

mle-ii Explorer
Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

I agree that my numbers were off now. Guess I'll have to rethink how to do the poll. I just wanted to make sure that folks that think fat is bad and cut a lot out don't think that 20% is high fat. Clearly I'm not a good poll taker. :P

I find for myself that somewhere around 33% from each is about right. Give or take. Though I don't use macros to determine how many grams from each. Usually I shoot for around 1 g per lean lb body mass, at least 100g carbs + more depending on activitiy and the rest fat.

Where I was going with this came from some studies (ok done on rats) that pointed towards gut growth (and I mean intestine/GI growth not belly growth) in rats that had part of their GI dammaged or removed.

I wondered if eating higher fat made us feel better because it helped grow/heal the GI. Thus the body takes in more vitamins, minerals and calories.

Perhaps I just misread the article, but it does make me wonder why some folks feel and do better on a higher fat diet and others do better on a higher carb diet.

Thanks,

Mike

VydorScope Proficient
I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat.

Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

mle-ii Explorer
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

LOL I didn't even notice that. Who needs the stinkin carbs?!!?! ;)

covsooze Enthusiast

This is a difficult one for me. I need the fat for energy and to stave off depression, but fat also makes my stomach sore. I guess I need to be more careful about getting the 'right' fats....but even then, olive oil can irritate my stomach. :unsure:

jerseyangel Proficient

I definately feel better with a moderate amount of fat. I stick to olive oil, olives, palm oil (as shortening) almonds and meats as my sources of fat.

tarnalberry Community Regular
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

lol :lol: I must have "fat" fingers. make that 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, 40-55% carbs. (corrected my math as well. :P )

to the OP - and that's a loose estimate, unless I've been having blood sugar troubles, I'm not militant about it. if I've been having blood sugar difficulties, or in a situation where I expect I might (like the long hikes I'm doing) I'm somewhat militant about at *least* 25/25/50, at each meal/snack, or at least no more than 50% carbs.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,894
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lostcha
    Newest Member
    Lostcha
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
    • trents
      You state in an earlier post that you don't have celiac disease. Here in this post you state you will "be doing another test". What will this test be looking for? What kind of celiac disease testing have you had done? If you have used a Entero Labs it sounds like you have had stool testing done for celiac disease which is not widely accepted as a valid celiac disease diagnostic testing method. Have you had blood antibody testing for celiac disease done and do you realize that for antibody testing to be valid you must have been eating generous amounts of gluten for a period of weeks/months? 
    • Gigi2025
      No, I've not been diagnosed as celiac.  Despite Entero Labs being relocated to Switzerland/Greece, I'll be doing another test. After eating wheat products in Greece for 4 weeks, there wasn't any reaction.  However, avoiding it here in the states.   Thanks everyone for your responses.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.