Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosis


ADSayegh

Recommended Posts

ADSayegh Newbie

Okay, so my daughter was diagnosed with celiac disease 4 years ago at the age of 4. Now, through routine testing I was discovered to have some positive, some negative, and some equivocal results. I do not have symptoms that overwhelm me and make me feel like gluten is my enemy, but I do have mouth ulcers, etc. The doctor has scheduled a biopsy, which we all know is the definitive test. However, I was wondering if I should wait a few months, or until my tests are more positive. I'm just concerned that if I recently developed celiac disease, then the biopsy could still read negative and I would just have to get it redone in a few years anyway.

What do you think?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Deb O (UK) Apprentice
Okay, so my daughter was diagnosed with celiac disease 4 years ago at the age of 4. Now, through routine testing I was discovered to have some positive, some negative, and some equivocal results. I do not have symptoms that overwhelm me and make me feel like gluten is my enemy, but I do have mouth ulcers, etc. The doctor has scheduled a biopsy, which we all know is the definitive test. However, I was wondering if I should wait a few months, or until my tests are more positive. I'm just concerned that if I recently developed celiac disease, then the biopsy could still read negative and I would just have to get it redone in a few years anyway.

What do you think?

I'm not at all sure what to advise you really - I'm very new to all of this. But reading others' comments on this board and from my own experience I would say why bother with a biopsy? There's plenty of evidence that you have celiac / gluten intolerance - why not just try the diet and see how you feel?

Good luck ;)

gfp Enthusiast
I'm not at all sure what to advise you really - I'm very new to all of this. But reading others' comments on this board and from my own experience I would say why bother with a biopsy? There's plenty of evidence that you have celiac / gluten intolerance - why not just try the diet and see how you feel?

Good luck ;)

I agree and you can take a blood test anyway,

As a definitive test that we certainly don't all know is the biopsy.

The biopsy shows damage to your villi from the sample points at a point in time. If you go gluten-free then the villi repair (to differing extents) but celiac disease is a lifelong condition. Aiming to have a +ve biopsy is a little like waiting till you have cirrohsis to stop drinking.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Karen LK
    Newest Member
    Karen LK
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Celiac disease is the most likely cause, but here are articles about the other possible causes:    
    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.