Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lucerne Light "holiday" Eggnog


adam2008

Recommended Posts

adam2008 Rookie

Does anyone know if lucerne makes both a light eggnog and a light "holiday" eggnog? Or are they the same thing. I have found Lucerne light eggnog on a gluten free list but didn't know if that was the same thing that i found in the store, which was light "holiday" eggnog. I think the only questionable ingredients are natural and artificial flavors. It also says spices on the ingredient list. Are spices questionable? Help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor
Does anyone know if lucerne makes both a light eggnog and a light "holiday" eggnog? Or are they the same thing. I have found Lucerne light eggnog on a gluten free list but didn't know if that was the same thing that i found in the store, which was light "holiday" eggnog. I think the only questionable ingredients are natural and artificial flavors. It also says spices on the ingredient list. Are spices questionable? Help!

If there is any wheat it will be listed by law, but they do not have to list barley, malt, or rye. I would expect that the later would not be in the ingrediences.

Felidae Enthusiast
If there is any wheat it will be listed by law, but they do not have to list barley, malt, or rye. I would expect that the later would not be in the ingrediences.

In Canada, Lucerne does not have to list those types of ingredients. I don't think our laws are the same. But please somebody correct me if I am incorrect.

Michi8 Contributor
In Canada, Lucerne does not have to list those types of ingredients. I don't think our laws are the same. But please somebody correct me if I am incorrect.

You're correct, the are no laws in place at this time...though they are in the works...and it sounds like they will be more inclusive than the U.S. laws.

Michelle

Felidae Enthusiast
You're correct, the are no laws in place at this time...though they are in the works...and it sounds like they will be more inclusive than the U.S. laws.

Wouldn't that be great.

Michi8 Contributor
Wouldn't that be great.

Just FYI...here is a link to proposed changes to the current labelling regulations:

Open Original Shared Link

Michelle :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,596
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vicki teach
    Newest Member
    Vicki teach
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...