Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Alternatives To Tapioca And Soy Flours?


gfbrooklyngal

Recommended Posts

gfbrooklyngal Newbie

Hi everyone,

I'm a new member here, but I've been reading for a while and find these boards incredibly helpful. I just discovered that I'm gluten-intolerant a few months ago, and I feel a million times better on the gluten-free diet--except when I eat certain packaged gluten-free foods and bake with certain flour mixes. The culprits seem to be tapioca and soy flours, which give me terrible symptoms pretty much instantly (though they're different symptoms than what happens when I get glutened), and I've read that some people here have the same issues. The Bob's Red Mill all-purpose flour and all their yummy bread and brownie mixes are off-limits for me now, so I'm looking for a good all-purpose flour mix that I can make myself without these problematic flours.

Can anyone explain why tapioca shows up in so many baked goods and how I might substitute for it? I know it can be done--there's a great bakery called Babycakes here in NYC that uses a garbanzo-fava-sorghum blend, but I'm not sure in what proportions (they don't have a cookbook or anything). I'm planning to adapt Open Original Shared Link for crisp-chewy chocolate chip cookies this weekend, so I'd also appreciate it if anyone has tips to share on achieving that texture with gluten-free flours.

Thanks!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ArtGirl Enthusiast

I think you can use cornstarch, sweet rice flour (which is the starch) or arrowroot flour (also starch) to sub for tapioca.

I relate to the disappointment in not being able to use the store-bought mixes. I can't have corn, and cornstarch or cornmeal is in so many of them.

Juliet Newbie

Babycakes was on Martha not too long ago, and so on the website they have a couple of their recipes.

Open Original Shared Link

Mini Brownies

Open Original Shared Link

Cinnamon Toasties

It looks like they use a combination of garfava flour (garbanzo & fava flour), potato starch (in lieu of tapioca), and arrowroot.

I believe in theory you can substitute one starch for another, so in lieu of tapioca starch you can use potato starch and corn starch. Tapioca has a lighter flavor than the other two, so that's why it's often used more. But I find that both potato and corn starch work pretty well if you have other strong flavors in the batter or you don't use large quantities. I also like to use sorghum flour, too, often more than garfava flour. It seems to have a lighter taste.

jerseyangel Proficient

I have the same problem! So many mixes contain those flours...

I am able to use several of the Gluten Free Pantry mixes. The ones I can use have rice flour, corn and potato starches. There are some that do have tapioca starch, so you have be careful there.

Some of the ones I use regularly:

Brown Rice Pancake Mix

French Bread Mix

Truffle Brownie Mix

Muffin and Scone Mix

Cake and Cookie Mix

gfbrooklyngal Newbie

Thanks for the tips, everyone! It's good to know that other people are going through the same thing. I'll definitely give those Martha recipes a try--Babycakes' brownies look amazing (haven't tried them yet in the store). And it's great to know that all those Gluten-Free Pantry mixes are "safe!"

A few questions, though: What's the difference between starches and flours? I have seen some recipes that use the terms interchangeably and some that specify one or the other. Also, if soy flour seems to be a problem for me, does that mean that the soy lecithin in most commercial baking chocolate is also a no-no? I've had issues with flourless chocolate desserts before, but I'm not sure whether the problem was with the soy lecithin, maybe cross-contamination, or (God forbid!) with chocolate itself.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Have you tried mixing the suspect flours into your own blend to be sure it isn't CC? I've read many posts about Bob's products being a problem. I suppose you could also try a bit of plain instant tapioca.

If they really are a no-no for you, perhaps your system just isn't yet ready to handle high starch content, or certain kinds of starches. Not all are the same, as you already know. Give it some time and try again in a few months. Same for soy, though allergies to soy are more common of course.

As for the difference between flours and starches, some seem more similar/interchangeable than others from what I can tell. Tapioca starch appears to be the same as the flour, but I recall reading that there's some difference between potato starch and the flour - not certain though.

gfbrooklyngal Newbie

That's a good suggestion with the tapioca, RiceGuy; that would help me know for sure. I wondered if it was a problem specific to Bob's, but I also noticed that tapioca flour/starch showed up in some granola from Enjoy Life that gave me trouble--that's what led me to the deduction that it was tapioca, since that was the only ingredient that all the foods had in common.

But it definitely could be that my system is not ready for many starches yet. I do seem to do much better (no GI symptoms at all after eating) when I stick to meats and veggies alone; even having rice or quinoa with a meal can sometimes make my tummy rumble a bit. I also have insulin-resistance, so I'm not supposed to eat too many carbs anyway!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



PeggyV Apprentice

This is the bread mixture I use:

2 cups garfava or garbanzo-bean flour

1 cup sorghum flour

2

RiceGuy Collaborator

I might suggest a look at a post I made recently regarding starches:

Open Original Shared Link

Still other things might be the true culprit, like sugars for example. Not all those are the same either, as I'm sure you're aware.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.