Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help! What Did I Do Wrong?


wowzer

Recommended Posts

wowzer Community Regular

I decided to try to bake these Gluten Free Melt-In-Your Mouth Shortbread cookies. I found the recipe on recipezaar.com. Well my first batch was one big cookie. I do know I measured something wrong, just not sure what. I decided to try again. At least I got a bunch of cookies instead of one. I was careful to meausre everything and follow directions. They ended up very thin, they don't look like the picture at all. One would think with only 4 ingredients, how could you go wrong!! I figure home made cookies have to be better than the ones you buy. If anyone knows of a great soft sugar cookie recipe, I'd love to try. I'm determined to get this right. Wendy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Viola 1 Rookie

Hi Wendy;

I haven't had a problem with short bread cookies. Are you using butter or margarine? I always use butter as I think margarine had more water in it which tends to make it a bit thinner .

Perhaps try a little less moisture, spoon it in the pan and just shape them with your fingers and put a half a marashino cherry in the middle of each cookie :P

wowzer Community Regular

I did use butter. It was unsalted butter, I'm not sure that would make a difference or not. They taste fine, which I guess is all that matters.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Can you post the recipe, or a link to it please? Maybe others can provide additional suggestions once they see the recipe.

chocolatelover Contributor

Here's one from my friend--haven't tried to make them yet, but she's a great cook!

Gluten Free Sugar Cookies

1

wowzer Community Regular

I got the recipe from www.recipezaar.com/146414

Gluten Free Melt In Your Mouth Shortbread

1/2 cup cornstarch

1/2 cup icing sugar (confectioner's)

1 cup rice flour

3/4 cup butter

1. Sift cornstarch, sugar, rice flour together

2. Add butter

3. Mix with hands until soft dough forms. Refigerate one hour

4. Shape douch into 1" balls

5. Place about 1-1/4 inches apart on greased cookie sheet, flatten with lightly floured fork

6. Bake at 300 F for 20-25 minutes or until edges are lightly browned.

I know the first time, I'm pretty sure I messed up on 1 of the measurements int the ingredients. The second time I was very careful.

Also thanks for the sugar cookie recipe.

RiceGuy Collaborator

The recipe doesn't specify what kind of rice flour. There are at least three different ones that I know of: Brown, White, and Sweet White. I cannot tell which might be the best to yield the desired results, but I'd try them all anyway just to see what happens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



wowzer Community Regular

I'll have to try the other 2. I used the white when I made them. I didn't think of that. Thank You

larry mac Enthusiast
....... Well my first batch was one big cookie...... They ended up very thin, they don't look like the picture at all.....

Wendy,

I'm no expert, but I quickly found that to avoid thin, overly spreading cookies, I needed to add more flour (or less water), and put the dough in the fridge before and between batches. I almost always have to make wet/dry adjustments to recipes. Gluten-free baking is much trickier than regular baking IMHO.

..... I figure home made cookies have to be better than the ones you buy.....

Ya got that right!

best regards, lm

RiceGuy Collaborator
I almost always have to make wet/dry adjustments to recipes. Gluten-free baking is much trickier than regular baking IMHO.

That's the first thing I thought of as well, but figured it probably wasn't the reason since the recipe is already gluten-free, so adjustments shouldn't be necessary. However, there wouldn't be any harm in doing so in the absence of whatever the ideal flour happens to be, or just to suit a personal preference.

On the other hand, what about oven temp, and preheating? Might that make a difference here?

zansu Rookie

the temperature of the batter can make a big difference in the spreading of some of these. I learned that the hard way... if the recipe says anything about keeping the dough chilled, they mean it! I was supposed to end up with regular type cookies that had chopped pecan centers, and I ended up with very goof madeline-type cookies once I cut them apart-- paper thin, but yummy.

larry mac Enthusiast
.....That's the first thing I thought of as well, but figured it probably wasn't the reason since the recipe is already gluten-free, so adjustments shouldn't be necessary....

rg,

I may be way off base, and I apologize to anyone if I am, but in my brief experience with all things gluten-free, gluten-free recipes are, generally speaking, not rocket science. They quite often leave much to be desired. I think they tend to be hit & miss. Some don't make any sense at all. In my opinion, if a recipe say's 2 cups of (unspecified) gluten-free flour and then calls for any more flour and/or starch, then it's not really a real recipe. That not only doesn't list all the ingredients, but is contradicting (Sorry). This celiac baking is a relatively new development, at least to the extent it's getting to be . And to be fair, when you must substitute numerous ingredients (I use as many as 6 or 8) to replace just one, wheat flour, and the results are still a poor imitation, then your starting with an incredible handicap.

So, IMHO, one must always take a gluten-free recipe with a grain of sea salt. Be ready and able to use what you learn thru trial & error to make any adjustment neccessary to any recipe. If you (not you RiceGuy but the plural you), if one follows a recipe, at the end of the mixing process one must make an observation. Hey, this batter looks too thin. Or, this batter looks too thick. What do you do? Why add more flour, or more water/milk of course.

....

On the other hand, what about oven temp, and preheating? Might that make a difference here?

Well that's a good question worthy of discussion I believe. Firstly, being a long time real bread baker, having experience working in a food research laboratory (Frito Lay), and having a professional real estate inspector's license (home inspector - not currently), here's my take on electric home ovens (and to a somewhat lesser degree gas ovens). It takes as long as 30 minutes to properly pre-heat. If that is important, what you want to do is let it cycle thru the elements going on/off a few times. Then it will be really pre-heated. What happens is initially the elements glow and create a lot of direct radiant heat. That heats up the thermometer/ thermostat fairly quickly and it says "demand satisfied" and shuts off. But the oven walls are not really hot yet (much greater mass) and so the oven cools almost immediately and calls for more heat. This cycle will repeat a couple times and eventually settle down.

The problem with rushing this process is you get more direct radiant heat (with more potential for burning the bottom of the pan) instead of more even hot air baking. Ideally, all ovens would be convection and that would help even out the heating. So, glowing means burning, good if your making toast, or want a crisp bottom crust. Unless one wants the heat on the bottom, you want to keep the glowing to a minimum, as much as possible.

Now, having established all that, does it really make any difference? Who knows, maybe, maybe not. I pre-heat for about 15 minutes, my oven beeps at me after 6 minutes, alerting me that it's ready, it's not. The elements are still glowing, not nearly long enough. Some recipes call for putting the item in a cold oven. Apparently some believe that works for them. It didn't for me the one time I tried it but there may have been other issues (like I screwed up royally). I do know I used to make those self-rising frozen pizzas that way and they worked like a charm. So there are different scenarios.

That's all I know for now. Love to hear some more on this. Ideas anyone? best regards, lm

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to ainsleydale1700's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

    2. - Scott Adams replied to ainsleydale1700's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

    3. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Thoughtidjoin's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      4

      Dried Chickpeas

    4. - ainsleydale1700 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Confused about HLA-DQ Celiac gene test result

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,433
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    emmelyn
    Newest Member
    emmelyn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @ainsleydale1700! First, it is very unlikely, given your genetic results, that you have celiac disease. But it is not a slam dunk. Second, there are some other reasons besides having celiac disease that your blood antibody testing was positive. There are some diseases, some medications and even (for some people) some foods (dairy, the protein "casein") that can cause elevated celiac blood antibody test scores. Usually, the other causes don't produce marginally high test scores and not super high ones. Having said that, by far, the most common reason for elevated tTG-IGA celiac antibody test scores (this is the most common test ordered by doctors when checking for celiac disease) is celiac disease itself. Please post back and list all celiac blood antibody tests that were done with their scores and with their reference ranges. Without the reference ranges for negative vs. positive we can't tell much because they vary from lab to lab. Third, and this is an terrible bum steer by your doc, for the biopsy results to be valid, you need to have been eating generous amounts of gluten up to the day of the procedure for several weeks.  Having said all that, it sounds most likely that you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. The two share many common symptoms but NCGS is not autoimmune in nature and doesn't damage the lining of the small bowel. What symptoms do you have? Do you have any blood work that is out of norm like iron deficiency that would suggest celiac disease?
    • ainsleydale1700
    • Scott Adams
      HLA testing can definitely be confusing. Classic celiac disease risk is most strongly associated with having the full HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 heterodimer, which requires specific DQA1 and DQB1 genes working together. Your report shows you are negative for the common DQ2 and DQ8 combinations, but positive for DQB102, which is one component of the DQ2 pair. On its own, DQB102 does not usually form the full DQ2 molecule most strongly linked to celiac disease, which is likely why your doctor said you do not carry the typical “celiac genes.” However, genetics are only part of the picture. A negative gene test makes celiac disease much less likely, but not absolutely impossible in rare cases. More importantly, both antibody testing and biopsy are only reliable when someone is actively eating gluten; being gluten-free for four years before testing can cause both bloodwork and intestinal biopsy to appear falsely negative. Given your positive antibodies and ongoing symptoms, it may be reasonable to seek clarification from a gastroenterologist experienced in celiac disease about whether proper gluten exposure was done before testing and whether additional evaluation is needed.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I agree with your post and have had similar experiences. I'm commenting to add the suggestion of also using nutritional yeast as a supplement. It's a rich source of B vitamins and other nutrients, and some brands are further supplemented with additional B12. I sprinkle a modest amount in a variety of savory recipes.
    • ainsleydale1700
      Hi, could someone help me understand the result of my gene test? DQ2 (DQA1 0501/0505,DQB1 02XX): Negative DQ8 (DQA1 03XX,DQB1 0302): Negative The patient is positive for DQB1*02, one half of the DQ2 heterodimer.  The doctor said I don't have Celiac genes.  I asked him to clarify about my positive DQB1*02, and he said it's a gene unrelated to Celiac.  I have all the symptoms and my bloodwork is positive for antibodies, despite being on a gluten-free diet for the past 4 years.  He also did a biopsy but told me to continue a gluten-free diet and not eat gluten before the biopsy.  Based on the gene test and biopsy (which came back negative) he ruled out Celiac, leaving me very confused.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.