Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help! What Did I Do Wrong?


wowzer

Recommended Posts

wowzer Community Regular

I decided to try to bake these Gluten Free Melt-In-Your Mouth Shortbread cookies. I found the recipe on recipezaar.com. Well my first batch was one big cookie. I do know I measured something wrong, just not sure what. I decided to try again. At least I got a bunch of cookies instead of one. I was careful to meausre everything and follow directions. They ended up very thin, they don't look like the picture at all. One would think with only 4 ingredients, how could you go wrong!! I figure home made cookies have to be better than the ones you buy. If anyone knows of a great soft sugar cookie recipe, I'd love to try. I'm determined to get this right. Wendy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Viola 1 Rookie

Hi Wendy;

I haven't had a problem with short bread cookies. Are you using butter or margarine? I always use butter as I think margarine had more water in it which tends to make it a bit thinner .

Perhaps try a little less moisture, spoon it in the pan and just shape them with your fingers and put a half a marashino cherry in the middle of each cookie :P

wowzer Community Regular

I did use butter. It was unsalted butter, I'm not sure that would make a difference or not. They taste fine, which I guess is all that matters.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Can you post the recipe, or a link to it please? Maybe others can provide additional suggestions once they see the recipe.

chocolatelover Contributor

Here's one from my friend--haven't tried to make them yet, but she's a great cook!

Gluten Free Sugar Cookies

1

wowzer Community Regular

I got the recipe from www.recipezaar.com/146414

Gluten Free Melt In Your Mouth Shortbread

1/2 cup cornstarch

1/2 cup icing sugar (confectioner's)

1 cup rice flour

3/4 cup butter

1. Sift cornstarch, sugar, rice flour together

2. Add butter

3. Mix with hands until soft dough forms. Refigerate one hour

4. Shape douch into 1" balls

5. Place about 1-1/4 inches apart on greased cookie sheet, flatten with lightly floured fork

6. Bake at 300 F for 20-25 minutes or until edges are lightly browned.

I know the first time, I'm pretty sure I messed up on 1 of the measurements int the ingredients. The second time I was very careful.

Also thanks for the sugar cookie recipe.

RiceGuy Collaborator

The recipe doesn't specify what kind of rice flour. There are at least three different ones that I know of: Brown, White, and Sweet White. I cannot tell which might be the best to yield the desired results, but I'd try them all anyway just to see what happens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



wowzer Community Regular

I'll have to try the other 2. I used the white when I made them. I didn't think of that. Thank You

larry mac Enthusiast
....... Well my first batch was one big cookie...... They ended up very thin, they don't look like the picture at all.....

Wendy,

I'm no expert, but I quickly found that to avoid thin, overly spreading cookies, I needed to add more flour (or less water), and put the dough in the fridge before and between batches. I almost always have to make wet/dry adjustments to recipes. Gluten-free baking is much trickier than regular baking IMHO.

..... I figure home made cookies have to be better than the ones you buy.....

Ya got that right!

best regards, lm

RiceGuy Collaborator
I almost always have to make wet/dry adjustments to recipes. Gluten-free baking is much trickier than regular baking IMHO.

That's the first thing I thought of as well, but figured it probably wasn't the reason since the recipe is already gluten-free, so adjustments shouldn't be necessary. However, there wouldn't be any harm in doing so in the absence of whatever the ideal flour happens to be, or just to suit a personal preference.

On the other hand, what about oven temp, and preheating? Might that make a difference here?

zansu Rookie

the temperature of the batter can make a big difference in the spreading of some of these. I learned that the hard way... if the recipe says anything about keeping the dough chilled, they mean it! I was supposed to end up with regular type cookies that had chopped pecan centers, and I ended up with very goof madeline-type cookies once I cut them apart-- paper thin, but yummy.

larry mac Enthusiast
.....That's the first thing I thought of as well, but figured it probably wasn't the reason since the recipe is already gluten-free, so adjustments shouldn't be necessary....

rg,

I may be way off base, and I apologize to anyone if I am, but in my brief experience with all things gluten-free, gluten-free recipes are, generally speaking, not rocket science. They quite often leave much to be desired. I think they tend to be hit & miss. Some don't make any sense at all. In my opinion, if a recipe say's 2 cups of (unspecified) gluten-free flour and then calls for any more flour and/or starch, then it's not really a real recipe. That not only doesn't list all the ingredients, but is contradicting (Sorry). This celiac baking is a relatively new development, at least to the extent it's getting to be . And to be fair, when you must substitute numerous ingredients (I use as many as 6 or 8) to replace just one, wheat flour, and the results are still a poor imitation, then your starting with an incredible handicap.

So, IMHO, one must always take a gluten-free recipe with a grain of sea salt. Be ready and able to use what you learn thru trial & error to make any adjustment neccessary to any recipe. If you (not you RiceGuy but the plural you), if one follows a recipe, at the end of the mixing process one must make an observation. Hey, this batter looks too thin. Or, this batter looks too thick. What do you do? Why add more flour, or more water/milk of course.

....

On the other hand, what about oven temp, and preheating? Might that make a difference here?

Well that's a good question worthy of discussion I believe. Firstly, being a long time real bread baker, having experience working in a food research laboratory (Frito Lay), and having a professional real estate inspector's license (home inspector - not currently), here's my take on electric home ovens (and to a somewhat lesser degree gas ovens). It takes as long as 30 minutes to properly pre-heat. If that is important, what you want to do is let it cycle thru the elements going on/off a few times. Then it will be really pre-heated. What happens is initially the elements glow and create a lot of direct radiant heat. That heats up the thermometer/ thermostat fairly quickly and it says "demand satisfied" and shuts off. But the oven walls are not really hot yet (much greater mass) and so the oven cools almost immediately and calls for more heat. This cycle will repeat a couple times and eventually settle down.

The problem with rushing this process is you get more direct radiant heat (with more potential for burning the bottom of the pan) instead of more even hot air baking. Ideally, all ovens would be convection and that would help even out the heating. So, glowing means burning, good if your making toast, or want a crisp bottom crust. Unless one wants the heat on the bottom, you want to keep the glowing to a minimum, as much as possible.

Now, having established all that, does it really make any difference? Who knows, maybe, maybe not. I pre-heat for about 15 minutes, my oven beeps at me after 6 minutes, alerting me that it's ready, it's not. The elements are still glowing, not nearly long enough. Some recipes call for putting the item in a cold oven. Apparently some believe that works for them. It didn't for me the one time I tried it but there may have been other issues (like I screwed up royally). I do know I used to make those self-rising frozen pizzas that way and they worked like a charm. So there are different scenarios.

That's all I know for now. Love to hear some more on this. Ideas anyone? best regards, lm

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.