Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

An Interesting Experiment


tarnalberry

Recommended Posts

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Why is it not okay for people to enjoy music only when it is on their schedule yet the participants in the experiment expect people to conform to their schedule (Friday morning rush hour)?

How are you defining "enjoy?" It seems to me that people could have spared 5-10 seconds to glance at and listen to an extraordinary musician. The number of people who didn't even glance his way or slow down their stride DOES shock me.

Are people in such a hurry that a few seconds cannot be spared for something like one of the best violinists of the century?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim-n-VA Contributor

I guess what bothers me about the whole thing is the idea that someone thinks they have the right to decide what someone else should do, even for a few seconds.

When I used DC public transit (and occasionally still do), I use that time to read. Ironically, I taught myself to read music while reading books on DC area transit.

I can see, and mostly agree, that life would probably have been better in some sense if everyone who walked by had experienced what those few people who stopped experienced. At the same time I like them having the freedom to walk by without even glancing at the guy. And, I'm not sure that everyone, or even most, would have experienced the same thing if they had stopped.

I know that if I'd been there I would have walked right on by. If there had been someone playing a mandolin, at almost any skill level, I would have stopped.

tarnalberry Community Regular
I guess what bothers me about the whole thing is the idea that someone thinks they have the right to decide what someone else should do, even for a few seconds.

When I used DC public transit (and occasionally still do), I use that time to read. Ironically, I taught myself to read music while reading books on DC area transit.

I can see, and mostly agree, that life would probably have been better in some sense if everyone who walked by had experienced what those few people who stopped experienced. At the same time I like them having the freedom to walk by without even glancing at the guy. And, I'm not sure that everyone, or even most, would have experienced the same thing if they had stopped.

I know that if I'd been there I would have walked right on by. If there had been someone playing a mandolin, at almost any skill level, I would have stopped.

We're arguing two different things - and it's a crucial point. This isn't a black or white, all or nothing issue. I certainly don't mean to say that you, Tim, definitely should have stopped had you been there. And the point certainly isn't that everyone would have experienced the same thing - they absolutely would have experienced different things. But as almost no one paid attention, almost no one experienced anything. (Note how many people didn't even remember that there was anyone there.)

It's not the individual instances that - again, in my opinion, and the article doesn't, in my opinion, sufficiently address this - are the issue, but the mindset that we can go around in general, in life, not paying attention to anything outside our world. Then you'll miss the first flower of spring. The minute the clouds part on a rainy day for the sunlight to slash through. The child playing in the park. The random santa's hat with the silver top bit left on the side of the road (I spotted that one three weeks ago).

Tim-n-VA Contributor

I agree. I think the key issues we are in sync on. The format of internet messaging sometimes leads to digression based on minor sematics that would quickly be smoothed over if talking face-to-face.

Felidae Enthusiast

I liked that article and the music with it. For a very simple point, sometimes we need to just stop and take in our surroundings and you never know what we may find in that moment.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to brian weinstein's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Cigars

    2. - brian weinstein replied to brian weinstein's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Cigars

    3. - trents replied to brian weinstein's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Cigars

    4. - brian weinstein posted a topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Cigars


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    brian weinstein
    Newest Member
    brian weinstein
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I think the best you will be able to do is to find out if gluten, or at least wheat, barley or rye is an intentional ingredient in a smoke product and only the manufacturer can answer that question. Since smokes are regulated by the AFT and not the FDA, allergens are not required to be declared in the labeling.
    • brian weinstein
      yes i understand that pectin is gluten free ty.  i want to know if any cigars are gluten free its a simple question
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @brian weinstein! Gluten is a protein found in wheat barley and rye kernels. Pectin is a polysaccharide (a very complex sugar) found in the cell walls of fruits and vegetables. It is most commonly used as a thickening agent in food products, particularly jellies. So, pectin is naturally gluten free. That is not to the same as saying the cigar is gluten free.  Personally, I am reluctant to text you. I think most of us would feel the same way. Too many people already have access to our cell phone numbers.
    • brian weinstein
      i have a question i called 3 cigar manufacturers alec bradley, olivia and camacho to ask if any of their cigars are gluten free?  camacho told me that their cigars are made with pectin does that mean they are gluten free?  does anyone know the correct answer please let me know text me at (347) 219-6325 ty 
    • lizzie42
×
×
  • Create New...