Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Positive Predictive Value

rebz

Recommended Posts

rebz Rookie
rebz
Posted

Hello

I have just come across a scientific paper written by my GI doc, looking at the positive predictive value of the tTG IgA test ie if you have a positive test what is the chance of you having celiac disease. The centre looked at 2000 patients with GI symptoms ,then how many of those with positive tTG results actually celiac disease. The answer is between 9-30%, depending if you are in a high or low risk group. The high or low risk group was defined by symtoms such as abdo pain, diarrhea etc..

I am really interested in anyones view of this - I have a positive tTG but negative EMA, and am scheduled for biopsy on Monday at this centre. Thought I had a high risk of having celiac disease because of the positive tTG, now I am totally confused..

Any ideas anyone ?

Rebecca

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I loked at several abstracta about this in www.pubmed.com the other day, adn noticed that they only recognized villous atrophy as celiac.

we know that the damage in the villi can be just in the tips, or show up as increased lymphocytes. Those woud be negative for celiac according to those standards.

Also, researchers have tested the biopsies for Ttg activity, and found out that villi that show noe signs af celiac , show Ttg antibodies in patients with suspected celiac......

You can be celiac and have antibodies in the gut and the villi are still there and look normal.....

Also, often the damage is patchy, so that 12-15 biopsies are recommended.

With me, they tok only 4. With daughter, they took 4 but only examined 2.....

BTW, have you read the latest blog entries at www.thefooddoc.com

nora

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

I agree with Nora. Other studies have shown that the ttg levels may not rise until you have total, or near total villi destruction, so their interpretation is backwards. If you have destroyed villi you have a high probability of having high ttg levels, but having high ttg levels doesn't mean you will have sufficient destruction that they'll see it during a casual biopsy. It's a subtle distinction...

rebz Rookie
rebz
Posted
  • Author

Thank you for your knowledgable replies. You are correct that they look only for villous atrophy, not for lymphocytosis.

I think they usually do 4 biopsies at this centre, is it worth asking them to take more ?

From what you are saying even if the biopsy is negative, and hence they won't diagnose celiac, it would be worth seeing if I have dietary response.

Rebecca

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Yes, even if the biopsy is negative, heck even if the blood test is negative a dietary trial gluten-free should be done. Not doing so can result in years of misdiagnosis and suffering and also permenent damage to the brain and other organs. As my GI said recently the tests we have for celiac are not extrememly accurate.

Tim-n-VA Contributor
Tim-n-VA
Posted

There is a lot of conflicting info. This is how I understand it for celiac:

1) Consume gluten

2) Body produces tTg

3) Damage occurs

The confusion frequently arises when the level of tTg or the amount of damage is not detected (or not considered significant by a medical person).

Is that correct?

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

I think the order is:

1

3

2

Damage can begin before any other signs or symptoms are present. Some people only have signs of malabsorption, and only after a long time.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


hathor Contributor
hathor
Posted

One thing I've wondered about -- if you have malabsorption (at least according to Enterolab), does this mean villi damage or can it come about another way? I don't have the celiac genes. But I suppose if malabsorption means that the villi are damaged, I could call myself celiac. It would make explaining things to people easier :rolleyes:

confused Community Regular
confused
Posted
One thing I've wondered about -- if you have malabsorption (at least according to Enterolab), does this mean villi damage or can it come about another way? I don't have the celiac genes. But I suppose if malabsorption means that the villi are damaged, I could call myself celiac. It would make explaining things to people easier :rolleyes:

I have wondered that to.

paula

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,118
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Cwbtex
    Newest Member
    Cwbtex
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Gluten related ??

      By Colleen H · Posted

      Yes this is very frustrating for me ... not sure what to think.  Feels like I'm having reactions to a lot of things  Now applesauce?? I don't understand 😞 
    • Colleen H
      Gluten related ??

      By Colleen H · Posted

      I did ... But aren't we going to be vitamin deficienct if we are not eating due to being sick ?? If the food we eat is gluten free and we have other sensitivities , how do we get out of the cycle??  Thank you 
    • Colleen H
      Heat intolerant... Yikes

      By Colleen H · Posted

      Anyone else get pins and needles. ??? Burning feeling ? Heat makes it so much worse 😔  Winter is here.  I had to lower my thermostat because I couldn't take that hot air feeling 😔  Hopefully it goes away soon     
    • trents
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By trents · Posted

      I assume that you already know that genetic testing for celiac disease cannot be used to confirm a celiac diagnosis. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. It can be used to rule out celiac disease with a high degree of confidence, however, in the case where the genetic testing is negative for the genes. Until and unless you are actually diagnosed with celiac disease I would not raise this as an issue with family. However, if you are diagnosed with celiac disease through blood antibody testing and/or endoscopy with positive biopsy I would suggest you encourage first degree relatives to also purse testing because there is a significant chance (somewhere betwee 10% and almost 50%, depending on which studies you reference) that they will also have or will develop active celiac disease. Often, there are symptoms are absent or very minor until damage to the small bowel lining or other body systems becomes significant so be prepared that they may blow you off. We call this "silent celiac disease". 
    • trents
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      If you were off gluten for two months that would have been long enough to invalidate the celiac blood antibody testing. Many people make the same mistake. They experiment with the gluten free diet before seeking formal testing. Once you remove gluten from the diet the antibodies stop being produced and those that are already in circulation begin to be removed and often drop below detectable levels. To pursue valid testing for celiac disease you would need to resume gluten consumption equivalent to the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks, preferably longer. These are the most recent guidelines for the "gluten challenge". Without formal testing there is no way to distinguish between celiac disease and gluten sensitivity since their symptoms overlap. However, celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the small bowel lining, not true of gluten sensitivity. There is no test available for gluten sensitivity so celiac disease must first be ruled out. By the way, elevated liver enzymes was what led to my celiac diagnosis almost 25 years ago.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.