Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Still Having Stomach Problems


sfm

Recommended Posts

sfm Apprentice

Recently, after being mostly gluten free (besides a few accidental glutenings) for over 6 months, my stomach started acting up again. The symptoms were nowhere near as severe as when I eat gluten, but they were similar, the nauseau, pain, bloating, diarrhea, just scaled down somewhat. I know that others on this site have mentioned similar experiences, so I thought I might have other intolerances besides gluten and casein.

I began to see a connection between tree nuts - walnuts and macadamias (of course my favorites). The last time I tested it on walnuts, a few hours after I began to feel sick, I got hives - so I have an appointment with an allergist to look more into the food allergies side of things... <_<

But I also wanted to make sure that there isn't something else going on, so I decided to try another gastroenterologist. Last year when I went to a gastro (before going gluten free), he told me I had acid reflux and gave a scrip for prilosec - which I was already taking!

So I was a little pessimistic about seeing this doctor yesterday. But I told him from the start about my experience with the other doctor. I told him that I decided to try going gluten free because my daughter had blood tested 'inconclusive' for celiac, and the symptoms for celiac sounded like they were written about me :blink: . He actually listened to what I had to say, looked at my test results- both the bloodwork and the enterolab - did a quick exam, then told me he thought I should have had the small bowel biopsy anyway, despite negative bloodwork, because my symptoms had improved off gluten.

So he would like to do the small bowel biopsy, but he also wants to rule out other conditions with similar symptoms. He said he knows that celiac disease is extremely underdiagnosed, but that he would not want me to have to restrict my diet if I don't have to. So he will also do a colonoscopy to rule out microscopic colitis, and he wants to have a stool test done to make sure there's no parasites.

I feel so much better about gastroenterologists! I know that there is a good chance the biopsy may come back negative, but I refuse to go back on gluten because I know how sick it makes me. So I'll take a chance on that one. At any rate, he seems to be very thorough and open-minded and not just throwing an acid reducer at me.

And if everything comes back negative, and he wants to tell me it could just be IBS and I should try eating gluten again, I'll just say, No thank you...! :D

So enough rambling out of me, just wanted to share!

Sheryll


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Sheryll, he sounds like a better doctor than most for sure. But there is little point in looking for celiac disease with a biopsy, because after six months gluten-free it is almost a certainty that it will come back negative. But it is still a good idea to rule out other problems.

Obviously gluten is a problem, and I am glad you have no intentions of going back to eating it, no matter what anybody says.

ekdumas19 Apprentice

I too went back to a gastro after being diagnosed with celiac disease 3 years prior. I had felt after my diagnosis but something still wasnt right. He recommended a biopsy because he was worried that because I never had one to begin with and only got diagnosed by blood work, that I wasnt really a celiac. And of course it came back negative. I was upset about this because i wasted good time and money on the procedure. And funny you should say you were on prilosec before you were diagnosed, I was too! When I was in high school I started having lots of stomach problems, and my doctor at the time thought it was acid reflux and lactose intolerance, thus the prilosec. Anywhoo...after that last gastro experience I just decided to figure things out for myself. It turns out, after going lactose free for awhile, then soy free, I found out that soy was the culprit. My reactions aren't as strong as too gluten, but I get nauseous, gassy and bloated. I used to drink soy milk everyday since high school, no wonder I still felt sick! So I would just look into other intolerances, because now with that I stay away from soy and gluten-I feel almost cured!

aikiducky Apprentice
So he would like to do the small bowel biopsy, but he also wants to rule out other conditions with similar symptoms. He said he knows that celiac disease is extremely underdiagnosed, but that he would not want me to have to restrict my diet if I don't have to. So he will also do a colonoscopy to rule out microscopic colitis, and he wants to have a stool test done to make sure there's no parasites.

You could ask them to look for signs of past inflammation in the small intestine... like abnormal cells in the intestinal walls and other small changes that may still be visible even though your intestines may have mostly healed in the six months. That might be a clue that there has been celiac damage before you went gluten free.

Pauliina

tom Contributor

Yay it's nice to see some stories of good news!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    2. - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    3. - Dr. Gunn replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

    4. - Aretaeus Cappadocia commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      1

      How Social Media Algorithms Are Fueling Gluten Anxiety: TikTok, Reddit, and Instagram Trends

    5. - Scott Adams replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Test interpretations

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,659
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dr. Gunn
    Newest Member
    Dr. Gunn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dr. Gunn
      Exactly! Negative genetics can rule out celiac disease with close to 100% certainty. It takes tTg antibody testing and biopsy confirm the diagnosis in a genetically susceptible individual. 
    • trents
      What Dr. Gunn states is essentially true. It is a rule out measure. But be aware that to possess either of the two primary genes that have been identified with celiac disease (or both) doesn't necessarily mean that you have or will develop celiac disease. Almost 40% of the general population carries one or both but only about 1% of the general population will develop active celiac disease. It remains latent until triggered by some stress event which may or may not occur. So, there is a genetic component to celiac disease but there is also an epigenetic component. 
    • Dr. Gunn
      Have you had celiac genetic risk testing? A celiac genetic test is accurate with or without gluten in your diet. If you don't carry the celiac risk genes you can effectively rule out celiac disease for life. 
    • Scott Adams
      Based on those results alone, it’s not possible to say you have celiac disease. The test that is usually most specific for celiac, tTG-IgA, is negative in your results, and the endomysial antibody (EMA) is also negative, which generally argues against active celiac disease. However, your deamidated gliadin IgA is elevated, and your total IgA level is also high, which can sometimes affect how the other antibody tests behave. Another important factor is that you were reducing gluten before the test, which can lower antibody levels and make the results less reliable. Because of that, many doctors recommend a gluten challenge (eating gluten regularly for several weeks) before repeating blood tests or considering an endoscopy if symptoms and labs raise concern. It would be best to review these results with a gastroenterologist, who can interpret them in context and decide whether further testing is needed.
    • trents
      Since you compromised the validity of the antibody testing by experimenting with gluten withdrawal ahead of the testing, you are faced with two options: 1. Reintroduce significant amounts of gluten into your diet for a period of weeks, i.e., undertake a "gluten challenge". The most recent guidelines are the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat-based bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of testing. Note: I would certainly give it more than two weeks to be sure. 2. Be willing to live with the ambiguity of not knowing whether gluten causes you problems because you have celiac disease or NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). There is no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out and we have tests for it. Celiac disease has an autoimmune base. NCGS does not. GI symptoms overlap. In the early stages of celiac disease, other body systems may not be showing stress or damage so, symptomatically, it would be difficult to distinguish between celiac disease and NCGS. Both conditions require elimination of gluten from the diet for symptom relief. Some experts feel that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.