Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When Do You Introduce Gluten To Baby?


Offthegrid

Recommended Posts

Offthegrid Explorer

This is thinking waaaay ahead, but anyhow. I am dx'd gluten intolerant based on blood test but elected not to have the endoscopy. My brother has it. My aunt has it. I believe my mother (not related to aunt) has it along with other food intolerances but she refuses to be tested.

I am certain my hubby has it, but he had a negative blood test so he refuses to give up gluten even for 2 weeks. So there is a high likelihood that if we have children, they would also be gluten intolerant.

Has anyone just purposely kept their kids off gluten as infants and toddlers? When *would* you do a test of gluten? (By test, I mean giving the kid food with gluten in it and seeing if there is a reaction.)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JennyC Enthusiast

Gluten should be introduced between 4-6 months. Some studies suggest that if you introduce gluten too early or too late it will increase the child's likelihood of developing celiac disease. Blood tests are not supposed to be reliable until children are at least 24 months old.

dandelionmom Enthusiast

I've heard between 6 and 9 months. I've also heard that continuing to breastfeed through out the first year (or longer) and especially while introducing gluten can help lessen the incidence of celiac disease.

dionnek Enthusiast

I have a 4 1/2 month old baby that I am strictly breastfeeding right now (I have confirmed celiac and am gluten free), and was planning on waiting until 1 year to introduce gluten (stick with gluten free baby foods for the first year) so as to build up his immunity. I'm confused then why they say you should introduce gluten between 4-6 months (or 6-9)? Since they tell you not to introduce peanuts, etc. until 1 year due to allergies, why introduce gluten before then? Just wondering - I'm a very confused mommy!

Juliet Newbie

I don't know the reason why they say between 4-6 months; from the studies I've read, it's at best a correlation and not causal. They found that fewer kids get full blown Celiac within a certain time frame if they are introduced at this early stage versus later. However, the test has not looked at whether or not these same kids get Celiac Disease later in life.

I introduced my daughter (after my son was diagnosed right when she was born) to gluten during this time. She could not handle it. And later, I gave her small bits, too. She's never been able to digest it well. I also got the gene test done to make sure if I even needed to worry about Celiac Disease with her. She had the gene. So our pediatric g.i. said that if she had the gene and she reacted at all to gluten, she probably will get the disease since our son got sooooo sick at such a young age.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

See this link: Open Original Shared Link

The AAP published a study in the May 18, 2005 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. In it, it was reported that children that are prone to celiac disease have a greater risk of developing celiac disease if gluten in introduced prior to 4 months or after 7 months. These children were followed for an average of 4.8 years.

Here are the findings:

The Findings

Fifty-one children (3.3%) developed evidence of celiac disease. Twenty five of these children had biopsy confirmed cases. Major findings included:

Children exposed to wheat, barley, or rye in the first three months of life had a five-fold increased risk of celiac disease autoimmunity compared to those exposed at 4-6 months. Children not exposed until their seventh month or later were also at increased risk, but only slightly.

Among the 41 children who were at the greatest risk according to their genetic markers, those exposed to wheat, barley, or rye in the first three months of life had nearly an eight-fold increased risk of celiac disease autoimmunity compared to those exposed at four to six months.

No protective effect of breastfeeding was observed.

These findings were consistent even when the researchers limited their analysis to only the 25 cases of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease.

FWIW, we introduced gluten to both of our older kids at 6 months. One developed celiac and one did not. I have also read studies that breastfeeding CAN have a protective effect.

Guhlia Rising Star

What about those of us that have strict gluten free households? How would you go about introducing it then?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shan Contributor

There are so many different opinions on this! In one hospital, i was told by 2 different drs, to try at 4-6 months and hte other said only after a year. I gave mine a couple of spoons at approx 6 months, he wasn't happy and now at 13 months i hope to be trying it again. They said there is no way you can prevent it from being 'passed on', nor can you prevent it from happening altogether - neither myself nor my hubby has it, nor anyone that we know (except my step grandma :) ) yet my dd has it... whenever you give gluten to your child will not be the cause of him or her getting celiac! Celkiac is not contagious it is genetic - you either are born with it or not!!!!!

shayesmom Rookie
Has anyone just purposely kept their kids off gluten as infants and toddlers? When *would* you do a test of gluten? (By test, I mean giving the kid food with gluten in it and seeing if there is a reaction.)

Personally, if I were to have a second child, I would ignore the studies and not introduce gluten until my child had his/her molars. Why? It's all part of the ptyalin debate I guess...and to me, it makes sense.

"Ptyalin and Infant Food. It has traditionally been common to start infants on solid food from 4+ months onwards - however current research and WHO/UNICEF "Baby Friendly" guidelines recommend only breastmilk until 6 months of age.

For almost 200 years, medical science has understood that the saliva amylase Ptyalin is a critical enzyme involved in the commencement of starch break-down into glucose. Science has also known, but seemingly forgotten, that infants do not produce normal levels of Ptyalin until full dentition (growth of teeth).

With ptalin absent from infant saliva, two predictable physiological reactions can occur after the consumption of farinaceous (starchy) foods:

The indigestible starch "ferments" within the intestines causing numerous digestive disorders. Mucus "thickens" potentially causing ear, nose or throat problems. NOTE: What of Third World and Asian babies historically being fed rice and other starches? For thousands of years mothers in these continents traditionally chewed their baby's food first, before feeding it to their infant - thus unknowingly coating it with their own saliva ptyalin.

Low levels of ptyalin within infant saliva has been documented for almost 200 years my many doctors, including Chavasse, Sonsino, Tilden, Routh, Huxley, Youmans, Dalton, Page, Densmore, Shelton and Fry. More recently this debate is again resurfacing, such as through author Kathy Fray controversially bringing the topic to the forefront.

Instead of problematic starchy foods such as baby rice, baby cereals, baby porridge, mashed potatoes, bread rusks, crackers, biscuits, pasta and noodles; the recommended alternatives are vegetables and fruit, topped up with a little protein."

kazzadazza Newbie

well done for THINKING about what you might feed your baby before it is here . swedish research ( i think there are others too ) indicate that babies are less likely to develop celiac disease if they are recieving "substantial" quantities of breast milk when they are first exposed to gluten . there is no need to rush into introducing foods other that breastmilk into a babies diet - where possible babies should be exclusively breastfed until 6 months of age . i think that the most important thing to remember is that you don't just need to go -"well today is the day you must start eating , heres a great big heaping bowl of food for you " . i really like what was recomended to me by a nurse with my youngest . "just let them have a little taste of what your eating " so you just stick your (clean ) finger in and let them have a tiny taste of it . it doesn't need to be everyday , at first . its just a way of very gradually introducing your childs body to the concept of foods other that milk . it ok for them to taste everything AS LONG AS THEY ARE OVER 6 MONTHS . when i started introducing solids as an actual substantial part of their diet , i went for raw organinc wholefoods , banana with my first , avocado with my second ; but mixed mostly with breastmilk to begin . and other foods very gradually , after that . i really don't think that grains should be introduced before 10 months . my research has indicated to me that these measures reduce the likeliness of any innapropriate immune responses . anyway you have plenty of time to research and decide what is best for you .

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,437
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.