Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question Re: Safe/forbidden Food Lists


cruelshoes

Recommended Posts

cruelshoes Enthusiast

Maltodextrin is listed on both the safe and forbidden food lists. The forbidden food list says:

(1) Maltodextrin, when listed on food sold in the USA, must be (per FDA regulation) made from corn or potato. This rule does NOT apply to vitamin or mineral supplements and medications.(2)

I looked at a package of Open Original Shared Link at Trader Joe's yesterday, and here are the ingredients:

Sorbitol , Modified Cornstarch , Wheat Maltodextrin , Natural and Artificial Flavor , Magnesium Stearate , Gum Arabic , Sucralose Sweetener

Are Altoids considered a medication or have the laws changed? I have not much bothered with maltodextrin in the past, and with the new labeling laws, it would have to be labeled as wheat if it were derived from that. But those altoids got me thinking. Should this part of the food lists be updated? Just curious if anyone else is now seeing wheat maltodextrin on labels.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I am not sure what the FDA considers altoids....I personally consider them candy....but that's me :)

cruelshoes Enthusiast

Yes, I agree. Altoids are candy. So the part of the forbidden food list that says that maltodextrin in foods sold in the US has to be from corn or potato appears to be in error. Because that Altoids label clearly says the maltodextrin is from wheat.

Keep in mind, I think the safe/forbidden food lists are great. I relied on them a lot when I was first diagnosed. But they, like all lists, must evolve over time as labeling laws change.

I don't even like Altoids :) , but am only trying to bring the larger labeling issue to light. I want to make sure that the most current and accurate information is available to people who are learning how to read labels for the first time.

lovegrov Collaborator

The list is wrong. Maltodextrin in food CAN be made from wheat, but if it is, it must clearly state it is made from wheat. We rarely see it, and when we do it is often something made in Europe by a manufacturer trying to avoid using GMO corn.

It's true that the source of maltodextrin in medications doesn't have to be listed, but I can't ever remember hearing of any from wheat.

richard

cruelshoes Enthusiast
The list is wrong. Maltodextrin in food CAN be made from wheat, but if it is, it must clearly state it is made from wheat. We rarely see it, and when we do it is often something made in Europe by a manufacturer trying to avoid using GMO corn.

It's true that the source of maltodextrin in medications doesn't have to be listed, but I can't ever remember hearing of any from wheat.

richard

Thanks for the info, Richard. So if the lists are wrong, they need to be updated, right? How can we make that happen? So many people rely on them, and I would hate anyone to get steered in the wrong direction.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

my understanding is that maltodextrin, like many other safe ingredients, is made from corn unless otherwise stated. these altoids stated otherwise.

cruelshoes Enthusiast
my understanding is that maltodextrin, like many other safe ingredients, is made from corn unless otherwise stated. these altoids stated otherwise.

That is my understanding as well. That is not what the forbidden foods ingredients list says, however. It says this:

(1) Maltodextrin, when listed on food sold in the USA, must be (per FDA regulation) made from corn or potato. This rule does NOT apply to vitamin or mineral supplements and medications.(2)

That is in direct conflict to what I observed on a label this weekend.

I suspect I will not beat the dead horse anymore, but any error such as this can call into question the rest of the list. It is just my opinion, but I believe that the list should be updated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Are Altoids manufactured outside the US, i.e imported products? Don't know, just thinking.

psawyer Proficient

I think this is a case of the rule being misunderstood:

Maltodextrin, when listed on food sold in the USA, must be (per FDA regulation) made from corn or potato. This rule does NOT apply to vitamin or mineral supplements and medications.

What this means is that the single word "maltodextrin" when listed as an ingredient must be from corn or potato. It does not prohibit the use of another source, provided that source is disclosed, as in "wheat maltodextrin."

cruelshoes Enthusiast
Are Altoids manufactured outside the US, i.e imported products? Don't know, just thinking.

Yes, they might be produced outside of the US, but the list says SOLD in the US, not PRODUCED in the US. It might seem like a small thing, but I think it is important.

I think this is a case of the rule being misunderstood:

What this means is that the single word "maltodextrin" when listed as an ingredient must be from corn or potato. It does not prohibit the use of another source, provided that source is disclosed, as in "wheat maltodextrin."

This is good information. I think some wordsmithing could be done to make that more clear. I consider myself smarter than the average bear, :) and that wording is confusing. It says to me that all maltodextrin is made from corn or potato, not that it is made from corn or potato unless specified otherwise.

Checking the horse. Yup, still dead. :)

Lisa Mentor

Checking the horse. Yup, still dead. :)

psawyer Proficient

I looked up the actual regulation, and in addition to corn and potato, rice is also permitted to be labeled simply as "maltodextrin."

"USA Code of Federal Regulations

Sec. 184.1444 Maltodextrin

CAS Reg. No. 9050-36-6. It is a nonsweet nutritive saccharide polymer that consists of D-glucose units linked primarily by [alpha]-1-4 bonds and has a dextrose equivalent (DE) of less that 20. It is prepared as a white powder or concentrated solution by partial hydrolysis of cornstarch, potato starch or rice starch with safe and suitable acids and enzymes."

Note: FDA also permits the use of other starches including wheat. For example, if wheat is used it must be labeled "wheat maltodextrin".

Now, as to whether wheat maltodextrin is safe, here is what Shelley Case has to say about it in "Gluten-Free Diet, A Comprehensive Resource Guide, Expanded Edition," page 52:

"Wheat based maltodextrin is used more frequently in Europe and is now being used in some North American products. Although maltodextrin may be derived from wheat, it is highly processed and purified (significantly more than modified food starches) and rendered gluten-free. North American and European scientists using the most sensitive, scientifically validated R5 ELISA Tests have not detected gluten in wheat-based maltodextrin." [The bolding appears in the original text.]

So if you accept that finding, then you can say that all maltodextrin is safe. You decide.

tarnalberry Community Regular
Thanks for the info, Richard. So if the lists are wrong, they need to be updated, right? How can we make that happen? So many people rely on them, and I would hate anyone to get steered in the wrong direction.

Never, ever, EVER, rely on a list of this sort. They will be, at some point, wrong. Even if it's just by a day. Rely upon ingredient listings (this one clearly labels wheat) and rely upon calls to the company.

cruelshoes Enthusiast
Never, ever, EVER, rely on a list of this sort. They will be, at some point, wrong. Even if it's just by a day. Rely upon ingredient listings (this one clearly labels wheat) and rely upon calls to the company.

I agree with you. I do not now rely on lists, but I did in the beginning, and the safe/forbidden list was one of the ones I relied on most heavily. I am, quite honestly, surprised that nobody else thinks that the wording on this list with regards to this ingredient could confuse people.

Please forget I brought it up. Carry on with your normally scheduled discussions of poop and pizza. ;)

tarnalberry Community Regular
I agree with you. I do not now rely on lists, but I did in the beginning, and the safe/forbidden list was one of the ones I relied on most heavily. I am, quite honestly, surprised that nobody else thinks that the wording on this list with regards to this ingredient could confuse people.

Please forget I brought it up. Carry on with your normally scheduled discussions of poop and pizza. ;)

Eh, we all read things differently. What doesn't confuse one, will confuse another. Heck, what doesn't confuse me one day, will confuse me the next, even if I wrote it. :rolleyes::lol: No worries. :)

debmidge Rising Star

too bad that "corn based maltrodextrin" can't be called something else to avoid this word confusion.

can't they call it "corndextrin?"

lovegrov Collaborator

I do see how the entry can be read differently than the way I read it -- the single word maltodextrin means it must be made from something other than wheat.

richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,339
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Skydawg
    Newest Member
    Skydawg
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...