Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Uk Article On Food Intolerance Study


HouseKat

Recommended Posts

HouseKat Apprentice

Open Original Shared Link

Kate


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



babysteps Contributor

I get the dairy, yeast and egg being most likely to react

but how did barley get on the "least" list?

Unless they tested only people who said 'no known food sensitivities' and left out all the celiacs?

Who knows :)

I swear I have a bigger reaction to barley than to wheat - hopefully won't test this often enough to ever really know!

Ursa Major Collaborator

I don't know what kind of test they used. But declaring the potato the least likely to cause intolerances is nonsense. There are a LOT of people who are intolerant to nightshade vegetables. I am one of them, and two of my grandchildren are the other two people I know in person.

We have quite a few of them here on this site.

Potatoes will cause me to have diarrhea, joint pain, heartburn headache and just feel crappy by the next day.

I NEVER have an immediate reaction to potatoes, it is always delayed by at least a day. And since I believe that is common, that is likely why they declared potatoes to be so safe. I bet they didn't check for delayed reactions. A big mistake when looking for food intolerances.

And I agree about barley being on the least allergenic list, it seems ridiculous.

I would love to see who funded this study. The potato growers association of Great Britain (I bet such an agency exists)?

Obviously, with people in Great Britain eating 200 pounds of potatoes a year each, the potato growers would have a huge problem if people realized that maybe potatoes aren't so healthy after all.

RiceGuy Collaborator
...but how did barley get on the "least" list?

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. Maybe no Celiacs signed up to any such studies. And why would they? So I think the study is flawed in the extreme. There are a lot of members here that cannot eat nightshades either, myself included.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.