Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Allergy Skin Testing


~alex~

Recommended Posts

~alex~ Explorer

My brother (26 y/o) recently had skin testing for allergies and they came back all negative except a for a very mild allergy to ragweed. But the thing is he has classic allergy symptoms -- runny nose, itchy eyes/ears, postnasal drip, etc. Symptoms are worse in the summer and he has had asthma since he was a kid. I realize skin testing does nothing to test for celiac (my bro is currently gluten-free or at least very gluten-lite: he has not been diagnosed with Celiac but is trying gluten-free to see if it helps with symptoms.) but we were just hoping he could find out what he was allergic to and maybe get allergy shots to eventually help with allergy symptoms.

Does anyone know how accurate skin testing is and if there are any other tests? It was quite a shock that he came back virtually negative to everything. I have similar symptoms and take year round allergy meds but I have never been tested for allergies. I unfortunately have not seen much an improvement with my asthma/allergies since going gluten-free but thankfully I am not too troubled by any severe symptoms. My brother seems to have worse symptoms. He did not go gluten-free specifically for nasal allergies but mostly because I tested positive for Celiac and because of some other problems he's been having.

So I guess my main questions are about the validity of skin testing for allergies and whether anyone has any other general advice on the diagnosis and/or treatment of environmental allergies.

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MaryJones2 Enthusiast

There are several kinds of responses and my understanding is that the skin pricks are testing for a specific immediate response (IgE). I seem to remember my allergist explaining that the skin tests wouldn't help with delayed reactions (IgG). I think there are some blood tests you can get for IgG alleriges - maybe someone will chime in with more info on that. My skin tests were negative but the next I was horribly sick (maybe just from all the testing) and the wheat spot was horribly itchy.

Here is a good article:

Open Original Shared Link

My allergy symptoms cleared when I eliminated soy and now when I'm exposed to soy my sinuses puff right up. I know quite a few people who've had similar experiences.

missy'smom Collaborator

My son was recently screened for allergies by his primary care Dr.(my request) via blood test and a few things showed up so she recommended a visit to an allergist. When I showed the allergist the blood work, said she would include it in his file only because I brought it in and that she wanted to see the skin test results which are a better indication. In her practice they first do the skin test and then whatever you don't react to they inject under the skin on the shoulder/upper arm. His blood test only checked for about 10 things and not all the major allergens. Some were environmental and some were foods. They were listed according to classes 0 being nothing and 6 being the highest. We have an appointment this week so it'll be interesting. His blood test showed class 2 for wheat and nut and class 1 for soy.

jerseyangel Proficient

Alex,

I wonder the same thing. I had allergy skin testing done 2 years ago by an allergist/immunologist. He did over 40 skin pricks over 2 visits. Some foods, some environmental.

The result was that I was negative to all foods, positive for cats and highly positive for dust mites. It was interestiing because I have very strong seasonal allergies that require meds and at the time of the testing had eczema.

I asked him about blood testing for delayed allergies (sensitivites), but he felt they resulted in too many false positives.

From my own experience, the skin prick testing did not tell me which things caused my symptoms. I was given a prescription for Zyrtec and told to use allergy proof covers on my mattress and pillows (the latter helped immensely). He also had me do an elimination diet for my food sensitivities--I add this only because it turned out that legumes were causing my eczema. Since I cut them out 2 years ago, I have not had the eczema return--prior to this, I had it for 12 years.

Hope your brother gets things sorted out :)

Mom23boys Contributor

I have had skin pricks, blood testing and intradermal (little shots under the skin). For me the intradermal was the most accurate.

dbmamaz Explorer
I have had skin pricks, blood testing and intradermal (little shots under the skin). For me the intradermal was the most accurate.

I went to an allergist who specailizes in food allergies. He started with the skin pricks, and then did intradermal for anything I scored a 0 or 1 on the skin pricks. The way they explained it is the skin prick is a very small amount of the allergen, so if you react a lot to that, they dont want to inject any in you - but not reacting to the scratch itself doesnt mean you dont have an allergy.

I was tested for tons of foods and inhalants and reacted to almost everything ...

~alex~ Explorer

Thanks so much for the input everyone! I'm disappointed that the allergist didn't try the intradermal testing when the skin tests were negative since my brother has such classical allergy symptoms. Perhaps an elimination diet or food journal are in order in case there are any foods causing the symptoms. I wish there was just an easy, reliable blood test or something. But at least there's allergy meds to give him some relief!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    GGGrandpa
    Newest Member
    GGGrandpa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.