Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Teenager Facing Celiac Panel After 5 Months gluten-free


Mattie's mom

Recommended Posts

Mattie's mom Newbie

Teenage son saw a gastroenterologist for the first time last week. AFter hearing our extensive family history of undiagnosed but likely celiac disease and my sons story, she offered to run a celiac panel after 2 weeks on a gluten diet. (Son was breastfed for 3+ years, a chubby healthy baby, then by 2nd grade was tall and very thin. Gained weight on a Gluten-free Casein-free diet, but then "cheated" his way back to a still-tall but skeletal build. Last year in middle school, he developed terrible constipation with belly pain and headaches and missed lots of school. After that he agreed to be gluten free again, and has felt better since.) So now after about 5 months gluten free, we finally get an appointment with a GI doc, and are trying to survive 2 weeks of a gluten diet. Headaches are back, with terrible irritability. Are we all suffering for nothing to get bloodwork done on only 2 weeks of gluten? Second question: Is anyone familiar with Great Plains Laboratory's testing? Thank you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

After being gluten-free for five months, it is extremely unlikely that your son's tests will be positive. Five months should have been enough time for a kid to heal, and two weeks back on gluten will not be enough to destroy his villi again, and give him positive test results.

I am afraid he is suffering for nothing, and that GI is clueless about celiac disease. Even if he would go back on gluten for three months, he might not get accurate results, two weeks are way too short.

You know that gluten makes him sick, and he knows it as well. He should have had the testing done before going back on the gluten-free diet, it is too late now. The only test that will still be accurate is testing from Enterolab, as it will give accurate results up to a year after going on the gluten-free diet.

He might as well not make himself sicker and get back on the diet. I wished there weren't so many ignorant doctors out there who think they understand about celiac disease, when they haven't got a clue.

nannyb Rookie

I say you have your diagnosis. If going back on gluten makes him ill he is at least gluten intolerant. Personally I have no faith in the blood tests since I know so many people with false negative results. Doctors who must have an official diagnosis are idiots. I know, my GI told me to continue eating gluten and when my endoscopy showed damage then I should go off gluten for good. Hello.

Even if your son's test results are negative what will you do. If the answer is stay off the gluten then don't go through the pain. You know, he knows whether your doctor accepts it or not is their problem.

A gluten free diet is not like taking pills if someone doesn't need it it won't hurt them. We all know our bodies better than any doctor (and our children's as well)

I have two teenagers (oops one turned twenty) who had negative blood tests but maintain gluten free because they know they need it. There choice not mine. Maybe you should let your son decide.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You son has had a positive dietary response and became ill after adding gluten back in. That IS diagnostic. The best diagnosis there is. As many as 30% of us in even in the end stages of the disease will show negative on testing. My repeated negative blood tests lead me into a celiac world that is not fully recoverable from. My doctors never told me what they were testing for, in other words I was never given the chance to even try the diet as no doctor ever even told me what celiac sprue was. I was so ill by the time I was diagnosed that one of my children told me the family would understand if I committed suicide. That child was 15 at the time.

2 weeks on gluten will most likely show a false negative because after being gluten free the antibodies we form may not have built up enough to show on the blood test. The gluten challenge has already given you the answer. Do make sure you tell the doctor all effects of the gluten challenge. Also many GI don't know that celiac is anything other than a gut disorder. Mine had no idea that it could cause the neuro problems that I have. He was also clueless that arthrits can be another 'side effect' of gluten.

You may want to consider Enterolab. They do fecal antibody testing that can be much more sensitive than blood testing.

I hope your son is back to the gluten free diet soon and feeling better.

  • 5 weeks later...
Mattie's mom Newbie

We went ahead with the two-week challenge, which was waste of time, because the results (I requested copies) are negative. So we see the pediatric GI doc tomorrow, and we'll see what she says. My son is still eating gluten and is at the five-week mark now.

The first week he complained of headaches, took a lot of Tylenol and missed a day of school. He soon became his old gassy, gassy and cranky self. But by the end of the first week the pain had subsided. And what was really weird was that his chronic dandruff disappeared. Hmmmm. Constipation continued, as always. So we'll see what the doc says tomorrow. In spite of the "two weeks is enough time" bit, I like her. She listened to everything I said about our family history -- including my mother's two miscarries and four preterm births and my partial placental eruption with this son and my seizure disorder and chronic gassiness, both of which are gone since I've been gluten free for several months myself, and, and, and --- and dictated every bit of it in her clinic note (have a copy of that too).

Do you think it's worth it, since we're at the five-week mark of the gluten challenge, to request another celiac panel? Or see if they'll allow HLA testing?

Anyway, THANK YOU, all for your replies. I have learned so much from this forum.

And, Ravenwoodglass, your comment about your teenager saying the family would understand if you committed suicide really touched a chord: My dear mother did commit suicide after decades of what I velieve to be undiagnosed celiac, with attendant osteoporosis, arthritis, asthma, neuralgia, depression -- I know I'm leaving something out, but you get the picture.

Anyway, thanks again, so much.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Unfortunately, it could take three to six months, maybe even a year for your son's villi to be in such bad shape again that the blood tests will be positive. Do you really want him to keep eating gluten that long? He could have irreparable damage by then, or develop diabetes or other autoimmune diseases. Once you have those, you have them for life.

Mattie's mom Newbie

Diabetes and systemic lupus - those are a couple more of my mom's issues, and the diabetes surfaced in her 70's.

I understand what you're saying, but the down side of going through with the two-week gluten challenge is that now my son says: "I'm fine, Mom. Look, I'm gaining weight. I don't want to go off gluten again." The good news is our gastroenterologist said we could run the panel again - yes, in about a year - and if his sister is diagnosed with celiac earlier that she will order HLA testing right away. Sister's serology came back at way, way high.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Can you afford Enterolab testing? It is still accurate up to a year after going gluten-free. It convinced my youngest daughter to finally go gluten-free (she is 16).

nora-n Rookie

Here it says six weeks to six years:

Open Original Shared Link

and they only looked at vitous atrophy.

And, we know that in about 20% of villous atrophy the blood tests will be negative.

In patchy celiac, the blood tests will be even less postitive than in total atrophy.

Many will only have the patchy variant.

And , I read in the british meddical journal that in 30% of celiacs they are over-weight, literally obese, especially if the celiac only is patchy. teh body seems to over-compensate in patchy celiac and grab as much as possible out of the food and you get fat, even though you are malnourished....different things are absorbed by differnt parts of the small intestines, and you are dficient in those things even though you put on weight.

Thie diagnosis of celiac is almost medieval, by some blood tests which may be positive or not, and random biopsies that are done just at the beginningof the small intestine and are hit and miss.

nora

Mattie's mom Newbie

Thank you, Nora, for posting the link to that pubmed article.

I'm educating my son about the potential of developing diabetes, etc., in the future. He's listening. Still he chooses for now to wait on his older sister's biopsy results, assuming her new GI doc orders a biopsy. Also appealed to his teenage vanity: "You'll probably gain some weight and be able to build some muscle mass finally, when you're ready to go gluten free again." That was effective. ;)

Will keep you posted.

  • 1 month later...
Mattie's mom Newbie

We decided against the Enterolab testing. But everyone -- five people in two separate households -- is off gluten anyway.

Though son's 2nd celiac panel, after 8 weeks on gluten, also came back negative, his older sister's celiac is now biopsy-confirmed. Both are committed to staying gluten free and are helping each other navigate the diet.

THANK YOU all for your guidance and support!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,136
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ZiseChocolate
    Newest Member
    ZiseChocolate
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jenny (AZ via TX)
    • Bev in Milw
      Reading labels at dailymed.com is simpler if you’re familiar w/ gluten-free list of inert ingredients (aka ‘excipients’  allowed by FDA.      www.gluten-free.com has that list & I’ve included It’s below…. Tricky ones for me are the “4 D’s“ because names are similar. These 2 are gluten-free by ‘legal’ definition— •Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. •Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Other 2 need to be questioned. (Maybe ok for isolated 7-10 day Rx,   antibiotic?,  but gluten-free status needs to be verified for long term / daily use for chronic condition, like thyroid or BP meds.)   These are : •Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. •Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca.  (Maltodextrin on US labels MUST be corn so gluten-free.) Technically, ‘Starch’ on USDA ‘food’ labels in US must be from corn, & if not, the source must be identified.   In drugs,‘ Pregelatinized starch’ & ‘Sodium starch glycolate’ can also be from potato, rice, OR wheat.  Wheat is more likely to be found in products made outside of US (Europe) where corn is not the major(readily available & least costly) crop.     Hope this helps even though  learning sources of some gluten-free ones may make them less appealing. (And while the “Read every label, every time” for gluten is a pain, I’ve learned there are worse things than celiac dx—Allergy to corn would be at top on my list!)          Bev in Milwaukee From www.gluten-free.com EXCIPIENT INGREDIENTS IN MEDICATIONS  Aspartame - An artificial sweetening agent derived from aspartic acid. Aspartic Acid - A crystalline amino acid found naturally in sugar beets and sugar cane.  Benzyl alcohol - Made synthetically from benzyl chloride which is derived from toluene (a tar oil). Cellulose - (ethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl, microcrystalline) – Obtained from fibrous plant material (woody pulp or chemical cotton). Cetyl alcohol - Derived from a fat source (spermaceti, which is a waxy substance from the head of the sperm whale). Croscarmellose sodium - An internally cross-linked sodium carboxymethylcellulose for use as a disintegrant in pharmaceutical formulations.  Comes from wood pulp or cotton fibers to form carboxymethylcellulose.  It contains no sugar or starch. Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca. Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Fructose - Obtained naturally from fruits or honey; hydrolyzed cane or beet sugar. Gelatin - Obtained from the skin, white connective and bones of animals (by boiling skin, tendons, ligaments, bones, etc with water). Glycerin - Historically, glycerin (also known as glycerol), was made the following ways: -  Saponification (a type of chemical process) of fats and oils in the manufacturing of soaps -  Hydrolysis of fats and oils through pressure and superheated steam -  Fermentation of beet sugar molasses in the presence of large amounts of sodium sulfite   Today its is made mostly from propylene (a petroleum product) Glycerols - Obtained from fats and oils as byproducts in the manufacture of soaps and fatty acids (may also be listed as mono-glycerides or di-glycerides). Glycols - Products of ethylene oxide gas. Hypromellose – A brand of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (see cellulose). Iron oxide (rust) - Used as a coloring agent. Kaolin - A clay-like substance. Lactilol - Lactose derivative; a sugar alcohol. Lactose - Also known as milk sugar, is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a filler or binder for the manufacture of coated pills and tablets.   Commercially produced from cow's milk. Maltodextrins - A starch hydrolysate that is obtained from corn in the United States but can also be extracted from wheat, potato or rice. Mannitol - Derived from monosaccharides (glucose or mannose). Methyl Paraben – Comes from the combination of denatured wood alcohol and benzoic acid (benzoic acid occurs naturally in cherry bark, raspberries, tea, anise and cassia bark).  Polysorbates - Chemically altered sorbitol (a sugar alcohol). Polyvinyl alcohol – A water soluble synthetic alcohol (synthesized by hydrolysis of polyvinyl acetate). Povidone (crospovidone, copovidone) - synthetic polymers  Pregelatinized starch - A starch that has been chemically or mechanically processed.  The starch can come from corn, wheat, potato or tapioca. Shellac - A natural wax product used in tablet or capsule coating. Sodium lauryl sulfate – A derivative of the fatty acids of coconut oil. Sodium starch glycolate - Sodium salt of carboxymethyl ether of starch. Usually from potato but can be from corn, wheat or rice. Stearates (calcium, magnesium) - Derived from stearic acid (a fat; occurs as a glyceride in tallow and other animal fats and oils, as well as some vegetables; prepared synthetically by hydrogenation of cottonseed and other vegetable oils). Sucrose - Sugar also known as refined sugar, beet sugar or cane sugar. Titanium dioxide - Chemical not derived from any starch source used as a white pigment.  Triacetin – A derivative of glycerin (acetylation of glycerol). Silcon dioxide – A dispersing agent made from silicon.  
    • NoriTori
      @Scott Adams  Sure, Any and all information is welcome. Also the only was to convince my family to get tested is to get tested myself and conclusive answers. Very stubborn lot.  
    • trents
      Understood. It's very anxiety-provoking when you don't know what you are dealing with and don't know if you are attacking it correctly.
    • Heatherisle
      I have heard of NCGS, but everything is just so confusing!!! Just unsure of things as her EMA test was negative but TTG was positive @19u/ml(lab range 0.0-7.0).Apparently she also has occasional bubble like blisters in between her fingers, don’t know if that’s significant. She is triallling gluten free as suggested by the gastroenterologist after her endoscopy. Keep getting different answers when typing in her symptoms etc. Some sites say it can be possible to have coeliac, even with a negative EMA . It’s so frustrating and her anxiety levels are through the roof. I know she’s hoping it’s coeliac which is weird I know!!! But if it’s not it just means more tests. Sorry to ramble on!!!
×
×
  • Create New...