Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Prescription Medication Insecurity


Guest hungryman

Recommended Posts

Guest hungryman

Whenever I start a new medication, I try to check it out to make sure it is gluten free. To date I have been gluten free, but recently ran into a difficulty.

When checking out a new set of medications, I found one to which the manufacturer, Glaxo Smith Kline, said they are not sure if it is gluten free.

It is called Combivir and is a combination of two drugs that can be obtained seperately. I know the individual drugs are gluten free.

I have taken Combivir, and I don't think I have had problems from it. But I can't be sure because the drugs can cause problems similar to being glutened.

So, should I switch to the individual drugs or stick with the combination pill?

:(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

In my experience, it is quite rare for gluten to be intentionally included in a pharmaceutical product.

Most manufacturers purchase raw ingredients, such as corn starch, from outside suppliers, and do not test them for possible cross contamination. So if you ask, they are unable to guarantee (be sure) that it is gluten-free. Unless they test everything they buy from someone else (and even what the make themselves) they cannot be "sure" that it is gluten-free.

These statements are couched the way they are to protect the company from liability issues if at some point there is cross contamination present. If a pharmaceutical manufacturer says they don't have any known gluten ingredients, then that is sufficient for me.

I would use the product.

mysisis Newbie

I was able to obtain information last month from the research department of an insurance company. curiously, when they were my insurance company they had no knowledge about gluten in medication, but as soon as i switched companies, they were quite helpful and provided me with this information. It says:

"The FDA does not require any mention of gluten in drug labels. Most of the gluten in drugs comes from inactive ingredients obtained from whole grains, grain flour or starch grain. Inactive ingredients such as starches that are derived from corn or potato sources should be acceptable(unless there is a contamination with gluten); unspecified or "pregelatinized" starch , dusting powder or flour may be derived from wheat. The source of an inactive ingredient can be changed without changing the label.

Sweeteners used in pharmaceutical products may also be sources of gluten. Uncontaminated sucrose, honey, detrose, fructose and corn syrup solids should not be problematic."

It goes on that : fillers "should be acceptable if not contaminated with gluten."

Then it gets to the meat and potoes of the matter:

"what manufacturers know: some pharmaceutical companies that responded to a survey reported that they believed their products were gluten free but could not guarantee it, in part because the supliers of the raw materials could not guarantee that their materials were gluten free. OBTAINING gluten-free drugs- information about the gluten content of phamacuetical products can be found on websites such as www.glutenfreedrugs.com. However, it may also be advisable to ask the manufacturer whether a specific product is or continues to be gluten free. In making these inquiries, providing the drug's lot number is generally helpful. If all else fails, a compounding pharmacy may be able to provide gluten-free products." Then, their "CONLUSION-Gluten in drugs as well as in food & cosmetics can be a problem for patients with celiac disease. Drug labels may not be helpful because the source of inactive ingredients can be changed without ghanging the label. Even some manufacturers may not know whether their products are gluten-free."

OK- so that is what the insurance provider has!!! Very illuminating! I recall there was an article in the last month or 2 on one of the celiac sites about just this thing. It was about the "excipients" in medicines and had info to print out for your pharmacists; you may be able to find it in a search. I've been wrestling with getting the new insurance company to give me name brands, because the generics keep changing their excipients, and the pharmacy has to go with whichever generic company they are commanded to go with, which makes me a neverending guinnea-pig. There is a list of the name brands that are gluten free, but the generics are forever ghanging their recipes. Besides the perfumes or possible cross cotamination possibilities, here are the ingredients that COULD be possible problem causers. DEXTRIN (can be from rice or tapioca or WHEAT-and they don't have to say -or may not even know), MALTODEXTRIN (obtained from corn, potato or rice, or WHEAT and again they may not know and the label won't differentiate), PREGELATINIZED starch(from corn, potato, tapioca, or WHEAT, same story), SODIUM STARCH GLYCOLATE & SODIUM SALT OF CARBOXYMETHYL (usually from potato, corn or rice but can be from WHEAT, and again same thing.) Now, If the drugs you are taking are specifically on the "glutenfree list", then they are fine, and if they do not have these ingredients then the only risk should be any crazy cross contamination. BUT, depending on your sensitivity level, these ingedients are the potential problem causers. What my Dr. has done to try to get the co-operation of the insurance company, is to list these items as medical allergies. It's a long shot, but they do not seem to be getting the concept that they are poisoning me. Some months more than others. The problem you MAY be having is when 2 drugs are combined, sometimes they use a binding agent, and depending on what that binding agent is, it could be problematic for you. I hope that some of this help you. Sorry it's so doggone long though.

slmprofesseur Apprentice

I asked the Kroger pharmacist about some Gluten-free vitamins for my ds. He laughed, yes laughed and shrugged saying there was another lady wanting to know if her prescription medication was Gluten-free. :blink: I don't like to go there when he is working to say the least@!!!!

mysisis Newbie

The kroger affiliate here did the same thing to me. The CVS pharmacist said, "oh, I know ALL abaout Gluten! But it is no t in ANY medications !!!! " Then I went to ocso/albertsons (who I really do not like); they have 2 pharmacists. They rotate weeks. There's a guy on even number weeks who is a... hmm, let's say he knows everything about something but I haven't figured out what that might be. I have circle his work days on my calendar and will not call or go in if he is working. Then there is the other guy. He is BRILLIANT. He is one of those genius type guys that you just know excelled at physics and chemistry, and probably sits at home reading periodic charts for entertainment.He was completely open to the information. He had heard of celiacs but wasn't too familiar with it. When I would find PERTINANT information that applied to him as a pharmacist, I would print it out and take it to him. He has gone out of his way to follow along. Yes, I have guided him I ask him for the package insert for EVERY medication, and together we go through the ingredients to see if any of the items are on the list of possible problem-causers. He has gotten to where he will have already checked the list by the time I go to pick up my meds. If there is a possible problem, h e will try to find a brand or manufacturer who doesn't use the same recipe.

Together we are trying to work the glitches out of the medication drama. The cannot give a diabetic meds with sugar, they shouldn't be able to give wheat to people with wheat allergies.

I'm glad I shopped around for a pharmacist rather than a pharmacy. I don't like the pharmacy, but this Pharmacist is worth his weight in gold!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    2. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - trents replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.