Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Immuno Labratories Blood Test?


Poppy Cat

Recommended Posts

Poppy Cat Newbie

Oh hai I'm new. =*.*=

I went to a nutrition counselor this past summer who recommended a gluten-free diet. Going gluten-free has alleviated pretty much every weird symptom I've ever had in the last ten years (I was *so* hoping it would be something else! I love(d) bread.)

Anyway, she also recommended a blood test to find any other food sensitivities. I got this kit that I take to a lab, they draw blood and send it to Immuno Labratories, then *they* send it back to the nutritionist's office and we make an appointment to go over the results. That's all fine, but the test costs $355. So I'd love to get feedback on any of this:

--Should I really pay for that when I already know what my problem is?

--Would the blood test be an official diagnosis? (I don't even know how to begin with doctors...)

--Has anyone else used that particular test, was it accurate, etc?

Thanks for any help you can provide.

Right now the holidays have me so annoyed that I'd rather have a broken leg than celiac. The leg would heal.

Grrrrrrrrr.

-poppycat


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mother of Jibril Enthusiast

Welcome to the group!

The blood test sounds like an IgG delayed "food allergy" test. Some people find them helpful to point them in the direction of problem foods... but the results can change depending on the health of your immune system, intestines, and what foods you eat the most. In no way can it diagnose celiac disease. Since you've been off gluten for several months you won't be able to do a blood test for celiac antibodies (anti-gliaden, ttG, and EMA). The best you could do is get a genetic test to see if you have one of the "celiac genes." Just keep in mind that the genetic test doesn't diagnose celiac either! You can have the genes without getting the disease.

Unless you feel like other foods might be bothering you... dairy, soy, corn, legumes, citrus, nightshades, etc... I don't any reason to do the test your nutrition counselor recommended.

If you feel like you really need an official diagnosis of celiac disease, you could always find a GI and do a gluten "challenge," eating LOTS of gluten for about three months. The problem is that you could have severe symptoms, but still not do enough damage to be detected by the blood test and/or endoscopy. So... it's really up to you. Plenty of people on this forum are self-diagnosed and are just grateful to be feeling healthy on the gluten-free diet.

Poppy Cat Newbie

Thanks for the info. I really am glad to have found this forum. A lot of what I've read here describes what I've been going through for several years. w00t!

I guess the reason I want an official sort of diagnosis is so that I can get on with life without being questioned-- I dread going to see a doc someday and being told that without some official evidence, they won't acknowledge what I know to be true. I've had overwhelmingly negative experiences with most medical professionals and throwing gluten intolerance into the mix just seems like its going to be a lifelong hassle when it comes to medical treatment.

I mean the big tip off for gluten was when my hair started falling out and suddenly I had a hypothyroid issue at 27. Thyroid problems are not really common in my family and while I credit my doc for knowing what was up right away with the hair loss, it kinda bugs me that no one but me questioned where this thyroid issue came from.

Piccolo Apprentice

Poppy Cat,

It was the very same tests that led me to be gluten free. I tested positive to 21 different foods. Some of them I went back to eating as long as I rotate them in my diet. The two that I haven't gone back to is gluten and wheat. It has taken two years for my system to get normal and figure out what else was bothering me.

Welcome to the board. You will find a wealth of information here.

Susan

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.