Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Fry's Cocoa


misseditbythatmuch

Recommended Posts

misseditbythatmuch Newbie

Fry's is a brand of Cocoa that is sold in Canada (and possibly other countries). I recently have been trying to figure out if it is gluten-free, so I have been reading labels.

Initially figuring this out was confusing. One of my sisters has a can of this cocoa which says that it may contain traces of wheat (and may also mention other allergens). My parents have a can of it that says it may contain traces of milk (but does not mention wheat). I just recently bought a can of it that has no mention of traces of allergens. So what gives?

My mother phoned up Fry's and got the answer. It turns out that Fry's Cocoa is produced by at least three different suppliers. So, though the cans look nearly the same, they have been made at different facilities. The can my sister has was made at a place where wheat cross-contamination could happen. The cans that my parents and I have don't have this problem.

So, one product, three different cans, two of the products with different allergy alerts and one with none. Always read the label!.

Geoff


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Chicklet Rookie

Oh, how annoying. I stopped using Fry's because of the warning of being made in a facility with wheat. <_<

jerseyangel Proficient

Hi Geoff,

Thanks for taking the time to post that. It serves as a great reminder that we should always read labels, as ingredients and (in this case) manufacturing practices can and do change. :)

misseditbythatmuch Newbie

It also shows that it can be worth it to phone up the number provided on the label.

For that, it may be hit or miss. In some cases, the person you talk to may be very helpful and informative. In other cases, unfortunately, they may not have a clue of what you're talking about.

num1habsfan Rising Star

Oh, weird. I have never seen a can with warnings on them...ever! Also have never been glutened (and have used a lot of recipes that need cocoa. Plus somewhere I seen a list saying that Frye's was safe, hmm...I don't remember what list or from where, I re-write everything into my "gluten-free bible".

misseditbythatmuch Newbie

Well, if the cans you have used have never had warnings about wheat on them, they are OK (according to Fry's customer service number).

Fry's may use multiple suppliers simultaneously, or they may just switch suppliers occasionally. The three cans of cocoa I mention in my original post were bought at different times. It is possible that Fry's had one supplier when my sister bought her cocoa, another one when my parents bought their cocoa, and yet a different one when I bought mine. We don't know.

num1habsfan Rising Star
Well, if the cans you have used have never had warnings about wheat on them, they are OK (according to Fry's customer service number).

Fry's may use multiple suppliers simultaneously, or they may just switch suppliers occasionally. The three cans of cocoa I mention in my original post were bought at different times. It is possible that Fry's had one supplier when my sister bought her cocoa, another one when my parents bought their cocoa, and yet a different one when I bought mine. We don't know.

Sheesh, way to confuse a Celiac, hey??

Still is going to make me double-check anytime I buy a can or use someone else's cocoa, that's for sure.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Felidae Enthusiast

I guess the Fry's cocoa made in the prairies is fine. I too, have never seen a warning on a can. I've been using Fry's for as long as I can remember. I'm sure glad they are safe here!

Thanks for the info.

MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

That is very interesting. Thank you for posting!

lorka150 Collaborator

Fry's Cocoa in the small canister is gluten-free, casein-free and made in a gluten-free/CF facility. The large canister sold at Costco may contain milk ingredients. That is what they told me over Christmas, when I ran out of cocoa and was confused that Costco's was different.

Felidae Enthusiast

I take back what I said, that Fry's cocoa in the prairies is gluten-free. Okay the small cans are gluten-free. The large cans sold at Costco say right on the label, "may contain wheat."

Chicklet Rookie

Well mine was bought in Alberta from Safeway and was a small can. Sorry.

  • 8 months later...
allergymom Newbie

Thanks...this was great info to find. We have just found a Frys cocoa that may contain milk and my sister has one with no warnings. Mine came from Costco and we've had to get rid of it. My daughter has a severe milk allergy and my mother-in-law is celiac. We now know it is possible to purchase cocoa at a grocery store. We all know specialty stores come with a special price!!

2Boys4Me Enthusiast

On a semi-related note Nestle Hot Chocolate mix (50 envelope packets in a box) now has a "may contain wheat" disclaimer on it. I checked it at both Costco and Superstore and the boxes had the may contain, but the canister did not. Cadbury was off limits last time I checked, but the PC ingredients seem safe.

solitaire Newbie

Hi I'm a Canadian temporarily living in the US while a family member goes through treatment for health issues.

Can anyone in Canada help me out by sharing their copy of the Fry's Cocoa recipe for CHOCOLATE PECAN PIE?

The recipe has been in countless recipe booklets given out for free in groceries. I left Canada without it.

I really don't have the time to experiment with a new recipe and that one worked perfect for me. I'm already spending countless hours figuring out where to find Dutch processed cocoa in the US.

Thanks in advance!

From one homesick Canadian!

  • 4 years later...
gollygee Newbie

Fry's is a brand of Cocoa that is sold in Canada (and possibly other countries). I recently have been trying to figure out if it is gluten-free, so I have been reading labels.

Initially figuring this out was confusing. One of my sisters has a can of this cocoa which says that it may contain traces of wheat (and may also mention other allergens). My parents have a can of it that says it may contain traces of milk (but does not mention wheat). I just recently bought a can of it that has no mention of traces of allergens. So what gives?

My mother phoned up Fry's and got the answer. It turns out that Fry's Cocoa is produced by at least three different suppliers. So, though the cans look nearly the same, they have been made at different facilities. The can my sister has was made at a place where wheat cross-contamination could happen. The cans that my parents and I have don't have this problem.

So, one product, three different cans, two of the products with different allergy alerts and one with none. Always read the label!.

Geoff

DON'T BUY FRY'S COCOA! My son had a violent reaction to Fry's the other day - quite a surprise because we'd been using this brand for years.  The product had the new packaging with the red band around the top warning against milk, but there is no mention of possible wheat contamination or even the ambiguous "natural and artifical flavoring".  I spoke to the company, went through 3 levels of their customer service- they were concerned whether or not he had needed medical attention, but feel no responsibility to notify people of the likelihood that there is gluten in this cocoa powder that will make a great number of people very ill.  I would not trust this company's labeling AT ALL - sometimes they label for wheat, sometimes for other allergens, which gives the impression that if they only list milk, that the product is clear of other allergens (that the company themselves consider in their 'Top 5") if the ingredient list is clear... VERY MISLEADING!!

psawyer Proficient

This topic is four years old, and information may be out of date.

In both Canada and the US, wheat is an allergen whose presence must, by law, be clearly disclosed.

Open Original Shared Link

The updated Canadian rules require disclosure of ALL gluten sources. In the US, only wheat is required by law, but most manufacturers voluntarily disclose all gluten sources.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.