Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Celiac Disease? Help!


alber2410

Recommended Posts

alber2410 Newbie

Hi,

I decided to join this forum because I'm being tested for celiac

disease, but doctors don't seem to agree on whether I have it or not,

and I'm getting kind of desperate with this situation. Maybe some of

you can help me with this.

I'm a 44 y/o male and I've been very healthy all my life. In 2007 I had

to take care of my 94 y/o terminally ill grandmother till she died in

April 2008. I had to work at home, attending to all her needs, while

finishing my masters degree in Computer Science at the same time, which

was very stressful indeed.

About a month after her death, suffered from several acute episodes of

diarrhea and thought I had some kind of parasite (Giardia for one,

which is very common in my country). I have a cousin who is a

gastroenterologist and he prescribed Metronidazole for 10 days (3 times

a day) with folic acid and B12. Incredibly, I had a complete remission

of symptoms for about a month. But... one day while I was having a big

piece of some kind of very fatty cheese I felt an urgent need to

defecate and had to go to the bathroom at once. The stool was very dark

and the smell was terrible. Then the same situation repeated with milk,

cream cheese, ice cream (chocolate), soy sauce, red meats and black

beans and peas (when I ate dairy products the stool was dark and smelly

with soy souce and red meat, I had watery diarrhea)

My cousin prescribed another Metronidazole cycle, but this time I did

not notice any improvement. He told me he thought I had developed

Irritable Bowel Symdrome because of all the stress I had been through

with my grandmother. Then he had to travel abroad for 3 months and my

symptoms started getting worse. I had to seek another doctor, because I

was starting to get really worried.

I had all kinds of blood and stool tests. My blood tests were all

normal, except for the antigliadin antibodies which were positive. My

stool tests were pathologic: i had bacterial overgrowth and neutral fat

in the stool, but no Giardia or other important parasites (except for

Blastocystis Hominis, but my doctor told me not to worry about that

one). After that, she told me I had to undergo jejunal biopsy with a

Crosby capsule (she didn't tell me why). I was so worried cause I

thought she was looking for some kind of tumor, but some colleague told

me about celiac disease and that she was probably looking for gluten

intolerance. When I read what that was and suddenly recalled that I had

been eating large amouts of oats during the las 5 months I became

really alarmed. So alarmed that I stopped eating gluten at once (so I

was gluten free for about 12 days before undergoing biopsy).

My biopsy results were:

Partial villous atrophy with infiltration of inflammatory cells in the

lamina propria (lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and a LARGE number of

eosinophils). Normal crypts and enterocytes; normal mucosal brush

border with no increment in the amount of intraepithelial lymphocytes.

When the doctor saw the biopsy results she told me I did not have

celiac disease and prescribed 15mg of folic acid/day + B1, B6 and B12

weekly. But then I read you had to keep eating gluten before undergoing

biopsy. My question is:

Can 12 days of gluten free diet (after months of eating large amounts

of oats) alter the results of a celiac biopsy so dramatically? How long

does it take for the crypts to become normal? And what about

intraepithelial lymphocytes? Can they go back to normal in just 12 days

of gluten free diet? Should I retake the biopsy?

Thanks for your help!!!!!!!

Alberto


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Welcome Alberto! Glad you have found us.

Have you been testing with the Celiac Blood Panel?

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

I would go on a strict gluten free for a months time. If you see dietary improvement, it would confirm Celiac Disease in addition to your villious atrophy.

If you choose to continue testing, do not go gluten free until all testing is over.

Lisa Mentor

Open Original Shared Link

I also found this.

If Celiac Disease is not your answer, I would encourage you to continue to pursue testing until you find an answer.

Good Luck.

psawyer Proficient
My biopsy results were:

Partial villous atrophy with infiltration of inflammatory cells in the

lamina propria (lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and a LARGE number of

eosinophils). Normal crypts and enterocytes; normal mucosal brush

border with no increment in the amount of intraepithelial lymphocytes.

<<snip>>

Can 12 days of gluten free diet (after months of eating large amounts

of oats) alter the results of a celiac biopsy so dramatically? How long

does it take for the crypts to become normal? And what about

intraepithelial lymphocytes? Can they go back to normal in just 12 days

of gluten free diet? Should I retake the biopsy?

Welcome.

12 days would likely affect blood testing for antibodies, but would be less likely to impact the biopsy, as recovery there does not really begin until the antibodies are gone.

The biopsy showed "Partial villous atrophy." Well, something caused that, didn't it?

I'm not a doctor, but I think this is one of those situations where the question becomes how much damage does there have to be before we decide that there is a problem, i.e., celiac disease. My understanding is that any detected amount of villous atrophy is diagnostic.

Lisa Mentor

Open Original Shared Link

Pitfalls in the biopsy diagnosis of celiac disease

These include: 1. Inadequate number of biopsy pieces. The disease is patchy, this combined with the fact that all biopsy pieces may not be oriented sufficiently to assess the crypt to villous ratio means that at least 4 to 6 biopsy pieces need to be taken. Biopsy of the descending duodenum is sufficient. 2. Over-interpretation of villous atrophy because of poor orientation of the biopsies. If the pieces are not sufficiently oriented to assess the presence of, or degree of villous atrophy deeper cuts of the tissue block need to be ordered. 3. If the biopsy interpretation does not match either the clinical impression or serologic results the biopsy should be re-interpreted by a pathologist expert in the interpretation of gastrointestinal pathology.

Causes of villous atrophy apart from celiac disease

In children less than two years old, there are several causes that include cows milk allergy, soy allergy, eosinophillic gastroenteritis, and viral gastroenteritis. In adults, HIV enteropathy and tropical sprue are the most common causes of villous atrophy apart from celiac disease. Radiation may cause a similar picture as well as autoimmune enteropathy. Other food intolerances have been reported though are exceptionally rare; they include a single case report of fish and chicken intolerance [18].

alber2410 Newbie

Thanks for your reply Momma Goose... As a matter of fact, I took the Anti-Transglutaminase test about a month ago and I'm still waiting for the results. My doctor told me that to have celiac disease you should have "villous atrophy" + "crypt hyperplasia" + "increased number of intraepithelial lymphocytes" and I only had the first condition. But I was worried that the 12 days I spent gluten free could have made the crypt hyperplasia go away... Very interesting article btw!

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Hi,

My biopsy results were:

Partial villous atrophy with infiltration of inflammatory cells in the

lamina propria (lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and a LARGE number of

eosinophils). Normal crypts and enterocytes; normal mucosal brush

border with no increment in the amount of intraepithelial lymphocytes.

Thanks for your help!!!!!!!

Alberto

IMHO when you combine the villious atrophy with the large number of eosinophils etc what you have is a positive biopsy. In addition your positive blood work for antibodies combined with the biopsy results makes it pretty certain that you are one of us. The villi actually have a pretty fast turnover so yes your being gluten free for 12 days before the test could have impacted the results. You could ask for another pathologist to take a look at the biopsy slides, you could continue to eat gluten and then go back and get rebiopsied at a later date when you have been sick for a while longer or you could just go gluten free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,073
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ImVenus
    Newest Member
    ImVenus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.