Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ttg Not Lower 3 Months After gluten-free


DadCares

Recommended Posts

DadCares Newbie

Our 8 year old daughter was diagnosed with celiac in December. (She has type 1 diabetes also.) Her tTG was > 100 (We don't know how high since they don't measure > 100). A biopsy confirmed her celiac diagnosis as well. Today, 3 months after being on a 100% gluten free diet, we got her bloodwork back and all celiac markers are still present. Her tTG was still > 100.

The natural question is whether we have made a mistake on one of her foods. But the doctor did suggest that in extreme cases a person's villi could be healing, yet the antibodies could always be present and thus never allowing the bloodwork to produce an accurate assessment of whether her body is healing. Only a biopsy would confirm this hypothesis. One more hypothesis is that we have no idea how far above 100 her tTG was when she was diagnosed and conceivably, her tTG is dramatically lower today, yet still above 100 since she could have been much higher in December.

She has gained 2 pounds (from 47 lbs to 49) and grown 3/4 inch in these 3 months. She no longer gets any of the headaches she complained about before diagnosis. She never had the other stomach issues that are common to others. On the surface, she seems more healthy and it seems like our efforts are working. Yet, again, her tTG and other celiac markers look the same which is contradictory.

To the best of our knowledge, she has been on a perfect gluten-free diet since Christmas with zero exceptions. We have researched every food she eats and watched carefully for cross-contamination. We have called manufacturers. Clearly, we need to reexamine everything we are doing.

Could someone please help advise or speculate? Could any of the hypotheses above be possible? We worked to achieve 100% perfection in caring for our daughter. When in doubt, don't let her eat it (including vitamins). Yet today's bloodwork feels so painful because we wonder if our efforts have failed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NewGFMom Contributor

Our Ped GI at Children's Hospital in Boston said it takes a year in most cases for the TTG levels to return to normal. If it's way down after 3 months, you sound like you're on the right track.

DadCares Newbie
Our Ped GI at Children's Hospital in Boston said it takes a year in most cases for the TTG levels to return to normal. If it's way down after 3 months, you sound like you're on the right track.
That is very helpful to know. The point is that her TTG is not way down after 3 months. In fact, it shows zero sign of numerical movement... both times the number has been >100 (but who knows what the real number is... maybe it is moving down but is still above 100 because it started so high?)

I'd be interested in anyone who started with TTG above 100 to see how long it took to show reduced levels.

Darn210 Enthusiast
She has gained 2 pounds (from 47 lbs to 49) and grown 3/4 inch in these 3 months. She no longer gets any of the headaches she complained about before diagnosis. She never had the other stomach issues that are common to others. On the surface, she seems more healthy and it seems like our efforts are working. Yet, again, her tTG and other celiac markers look the same which is contradictory.

No more headaches sound good. 2 pounds in 3 months sounds good, too . . . but it should really be compared to her wait gain rate prior to her diet change. Was she a slow gainer or had she really slowed down in the last year or so?

Not having an actual number for comparison really leaves that info as useless. I don't see not being "normal" after three months as an issue. However, it's very frustrating to not even know if the numbers have gone down. I don't know if this is possible . . . but could they send her samples to someplace that would give a definative number??

Don't forget to check toiletries and if you're positive about the food she has at home, I would take a serious look at what access to food she has when she is not with you . . . school . . . it's surprising how much stuff gets handed out in classrooms when you thought you only needed to worry about lunch.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I would back up the posters who said it's too soon and you don't have a definate number so who knows? The headaches are significant. There are a couple of kids in the local school who have lost a year's worth of school due to the many absences from headaches. Growth too sounds good.

Another poster at another site found her daughter's numbers higher than expected and called the cafeteria to find her DD had been cheating. They didn't bother to restrict her or report to her parent even though she had a disability report on file. So following up on her eating when she is away from you is good advice.

DadCares Newbie

Great points. I'll check with my wife on toiletries. Any typical warning areas? I asked my wife if Cascade dishwashing detergent or something similar could be an issue.

We know school lunch isn't an issue because my wife sends a lunch with her every day with the carbohydrates pre-counted (so she can give insulin for her diabetes). We are eliminating eating out for the next 8 weeks although the following are the only places she has food outside our house.

1. On the Border (Tex-Mex) - She only eats the grilled chicken and queso dip since they confirmed those 2 are gluten free. We bring our own chips from home.

2. Fries from Chick-fil-A - but only after confirming with the manager that the frier is dedicated to the fries only.

3. Vanilla Ice Cream scoop in a cup at Braum's

4. Chicken & Fries from a restaraunt (Laura's Bistro) that has dedicated its entire menu to 100% gluten-free.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

In addition to what other posters have mentioned, another thing to consider is that Type I diabetes can cause elevated TtG. So it may be that her celiac is improving, but you are getting a false reading on the bloodwork because of the diabetes. It might be prudent to discuss that angle with your daughter's doctor in addition to everything else you are doing.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jmjsmomma Apprentice

Hi DadCares, and welcome.

I won't be much help. My 5 yo son was just diagnosed in January. He also had TTG recorded over 100. We have his follow up testing in two weeks and I am already a wreck over it. I never thought of the "over 100" issue, but you are right. What if initially our children were really high....and now down to say....110 or something? I would be encouraged that she is growing, gaining weight, and that the headaches have ceased.

On a side note, we must be located fairly close to each other. On the Border, Chick Fil A, and Laura's Bistro are some of our only frequent haunts!

I hope you get some answers!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    3. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    4. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    5. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.