Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Glutening Myself Again For Biopsy


Guest BERNESES

Recommended Posts

Guest BERNESES

Hi Everyone- This board is wonderful, first of all and has been so much help. I hope that when things settle down for me, I can add more.

I had the blood test for Celiac's 9 weeks ago (and went gluten-free immediately) and showed a weak positive in my Anti Gliadin (22.7. Above 20 is considered weak positive acc. to my lab). Had multiple tests (won't even go there!) and my first GI discovered gall stones. Before going gluten-free ( about 9 weeks now) I had the smelly gas, the soft stools, nausea, cold intolerance and basically felt like I had stomach flu all the time. After going gluten-free all that disappeared.

Got a second opinion, GI. thinks it may definitely be Celiac's so he is going to do biopsy next Fri. the 15th. He told me to start eating gluten again (not happy about it but had an accident and figured I'd just go with it). Some of my symptoms have returned (that stomach flu feeling) but it's up and down. For example, last night I had three big pieces of pizza (I was terrified) and this morning, I expected to wake up sick as a dog. So far, it's 10:30 am and all I am having is the soft stools, cramps and gas. Should I expect to get sicker? How long does it take for being "glutened" to show up? I've heard the range is anywhere from immediately to 2-3 days. I'm just surprised I don't feel sicker. Thanks for all your help, Beverly


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The fact that you are experiencing anything at all should be a sign that your body is not handling gluten. You may or may not get worse. Some people don't even get symptoms when eating gluten but it still does the damage. How long have you been gluten free. They usually recommend being on gluten for 3 months before testing because if you were gluten free healing would take place and could cause a false reading.

Guest BERNESES

Hi Kaiti- I've been gluten-free so for 2 months so I'm not expecting it to show up in the biopsy- if it does it's a bonus. I took moderately positive bloodwork to be like moderately pregnant- you either are or your not! He's going to do the upper endoscopy anyway because he thinks my acid reflux (which decreased significantly on gluten-free diet) has been severely undertreated. I am content, regardless of what the test results say, to consider myself a Celiac and be gluten-free forever! If it shows up in the test, that's great, if not I will still return to gluten-free after biopsy. Dr. warned me if I had been doing a good job of being gluten-free, it might not show up. That's fine. Thanks for your answer- it was very helpful because this whole process has been so confusing and frustarting and scary! I really appreciate you post. :) have a great day, Beverly

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.