Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wall St Journal-general Mills "wheat Free" Push


babysteps

Recommended Posts

babysteps Contributor

Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kenlove Rising Star

Thanks for posting the link. Been hearing about this all day. COUld nto see the whole story but the comments were interesting!

ken

Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).

daphniela Explorer
Here's the link to the article, although it may require a subscription to see the whole thing:

Open Original Shared Link

Basically, General Mills figured out that people who eat gluten-free are very loyal customers. So their marketing costs for gluten-free can be low - some booths at gluten-free events, a little targeted advertising on gluten-free websites, and away they go. Article says General Mills tests their production facility to "assure a gluten free environment" and that they expect to charge about $2 more per box of gluten-free Betty Crocker mix vs. non-gluten-free.

While the headline says "wheat free", the entire article is about gluten-free (including a sentence about increasing diagnosis of celiac disease).

There's also a graph that cites "Mintel Global New Products Database" as source that shows almost 6,000 new products in 2008 claimed to be gluten-free, but that less than a quarter of those were US-based.

I have a subscription and it lets me email an accessible link of the article, if you are interested in reading the whole thing and the link doesn't work for you, send me a pm (I am about to head out for a long weekend, so if you don't hear from me before Monday Jul 6th don't get worried).

I haven't found the Betty Crocker gluten free mixes yet. I just live without desserts unless, I make it from scratch. If its $2 more, I will never buy it. A lot of times the stores around here have 5 for $5 sales on Betty Crocker mixes. If that's not going to include the gluten free mixes, I will live without.

Mskedi Newbie

Here the Betty Crocker mixes were $1 more than the other mixes, so I bought them for a reasonable price. Not bad. I haven't tried them yet... I don't actually often make desserts, but I was so excited to see them that I couldn't resist.

That article was interesting. I didn't think about how much they could save on marketing costs since they can depend on a pretty loyal market for their gluten-free products.

  • 1 month later...
Maddy1 Newbie
Here the Betty Crocker mixes were $1 more than the other mixes, so I bought them for a reasonable price. Not bad. I haven't tried them yet... I don't actually often make desserts, but I was so excited to see them that I couldn't resist.

That article was interesting. I didn't think about how much they could save on marketing costs since they can depend on a pretty loyal market for their gluten-free products.

A friend just found them for me in her local Roche Bros. They were on special for 2/$7. It's a little steep when they're not on sale though.

But let me tell you.........DELICIOUS and very easy! I've had the brownies and the chocolate cake, which I made cupcakes with and froze the extra for later. Nobody, not even my very picky husband knew they were gluten-free. Making the cupcakes made sense for freezing and portion control.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nancy N Rosen
    Newest Member
    Nancy N Rosen
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.