Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Natural And Artificial Flavors


kkkkaty

Recommended Posts

kkkkaty Rookie

I read somewhere that natural and artificial flavors can contain gluten. I read that natural flavors are more likely to contain gluten. Do they always contain gluten? Or, have I got it wrong?

And, does anyone know just what sort of gluten would be in flavorings?

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RESO Apprentice

Natural and artificial flavors can, but do not always contain gluten. Modified food starch is another one to watch out for, though it is usually made from corn. Some companies, such as Kraft and ConAgra will disclose any gluten (wheat, rye or barley) if it is in the flavorings in their products, but most manufacturers won't. They are required to disclose wheat, but rye and barley did not make the labeling laws.

I am nowhere near an expert on this so I hope others weigh in. My policy is ALWAYS call before using a product, because you never know. I admit I didn't start out doing this and regretted it (painfully) later. Also, if I know a company has a policy that discloses more than what they're required to, I try to support that by buying their products.

:-)

Becci Enthusiast

Yes, natural and artificial flavors CAN contain gluten, but they could not as well.

Your best bet, is if the product does not say Gluten-Free, to find a number and call.

I will call there in the groocery store, just so I know if I can or cannot leave with the product.

What RESO said was true as well, watch out for Modified Food Starch. It can or cannot contain gluten. It all depends. Always call or check for gluten-free.

Lisa Mentor

I do not concern myself with artificial flavors or ingredients, because it would not be wheat, barley, malt or rye. It would be chemically derived.

Natural flavors IF it contained wheat, it would be by law required to be listed. It would be listed in the ingredient listing or in the allergen statement. Barley, malt or rye would be a minimum concern.

Modified Food Starch, in the US, is generally derived from corn. If otherwise, it would be required to be listed as "Modified Food Starch (wheat)". Barley, malt or rye would not be a consideration as a starch.

As, always, if you have any doubt about a product, call the manufacturer. But do remember also, that your information is only as good as your customer service representative. Sometimes, it may take several calles before you can feel comfortable. Trust your instincts.

fran641 Contributor

Thanks momma goose, that is what I've read in my gluten free book about those items.

lovegrov Collaborator

I agree with Lisa. Artificial flavors will not have gluten. Natural flavors CAN, but it's really a very, very minor concern. In fact, now that wheat has to be listed in the U.S., hidden gluten is VERY rare as long as you know that malt and malt flavoring are probably barley.

It seems to me that CC and finding restaurants that can get it right are much bigger concerns than is hidden gluten.

richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      27

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    2. - CatS commented on Scott Adams's article in Winter 2026 Issue
      5

      Are Gluten-Free Processed Foods Making You Sick? (+Video)

    3. - Samanthaeileen1 replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

    5. - RMJ replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,805
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lovinlifeafter60
    Newest Member
    lovinlifeafter60
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      What about digestive enzymes that I hear help? I take align 5x probiotics daily.
    • Samanthaeileen1
      thank you RMJ! That is very helpful advice. Good to know we aren’t crazy if we don’t do the endoscopy. We are going to try the gluten free and see how symptoms and levels improve.    thank you Wheatwacked (love the username lol) that is also reassuring. Thankfully she has an amazing and experienced pediatrician. And yesss I forgot to mention the poop! She has the weirdest poop issues.    How long did it take y'all to start seeing improvement in symptoms? 
    • Wheatwacked
      My son was diagnosed when he was weaned in 1976 after several endoscopies.  Given your two year old's symptoms and your family history and your pediatrition advocating for the dx, I would agree.  Whether an endoscopy is positive or negative is irrelevant.   That may happen even with endoscopy.  Pick your doctors with that in mind. In the end you save the potential trauma of the endoscopy for your baby.   Mine also had really nasty poop.  His doctor started him on Nutramigen Infant because at the time it was the only product that was hypo allergenic and had complete nutrition. The improvement was immediate.
    • RMJ
      So her tissue transglutaminase antibody is almost 4x the upper end of the normal range - likely a real result. The other things you can do besides an endoscopy would be: 1.  Genetic testing.  Unfortunately a large proportion of the population has genes permissive for celiac disease, but only a small proportion of those with the genes have it. With family history it is likely she has the genes. 2.  Try a gluten free diet and see if the symptoms go away AND the antibody levels return to normal. (This is what I would do). Endoscopies aren’t always accurate in patients as young as your daughter. Unfortunately, without an endoscopy, some doctor later in her life may question whether she really has celiac disease or not, and you’ll need to be a fierce mama bear to defend the diagnosis! Be sure you have a good written record of her current pediatrician’s diagnosis. Doing a gluten challenge for an endoscopy later in life could cause a very uncomfortable level of symptoms.   Having yourself, your husband and your son tested would be a great idea.  
    • Samanthaeileen1
      here are the lab ranges.  Normal ranges for tissue transglutaminase are: <15.0 Antibody not detected > or = 15.0 Antibody detected normal for endomysial antibody is < 1.5. So she is barely positive but still positive. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.