Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Colonoscopy And Cancer

Mexican Trailrunner

Recommended Posts

Mexican Trailrunner Rookie
Mexican Trailrunner
Posted

It has been almost a month since diagnosis of Celiac and I am scheduled for a colonoscopy to see what damage has been done. I'm a little nervous. Have you all gotten colonoscopys? Have any of you had polyps or lesions that tested positive for cancer? Anybody know what the percentages are?

Thanks for any info.

Marilyn

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


shopgirl Contributor
shopgirl
Posted

It has been almost a month since diagnosis of Celiac and I am scheduled for a colonoscopy to see what damage has been done. I'm a little nervous. Have you all gotten colonoscopys? Have any of you had polyps or lesions that tested positive for cancer? Anybody know what the percentages are?

Thanks for any info.

Marilyn

Endoscopy, no colonoscopy. Generally an endoscopy is done to confirm Celiac because they're looking for flattening of the villi in the small intestine. Much less to-do over an endoscopy. My GI doctor said there was no reason for me to have a colonoscopy because I have none of the risk factors for cancer: 27, no bleeding/black stool, no associated pain. She said she didn't like to put people through colonoscopies unnecessarily because they cause so much stress between the prep, procedure, and post-procedure.

As far as percentages, I can't say, but, if the percentages were high, Celiac would probably get a lot more attention. Every time I walk into the gastroenterology office, I'm inundated by colon cancer screening posters. Did your doctor say why he / she preferred for you to have a colonoscopy rather than an endoscopy? I wasn't even aware that a colonoscopy could actually confirm

Mexican Trailrunner Rookie
Mexican Trailrunner
Posted
  • Author

Hi shopgirl.

My fault, I forgot to say I tested positive for occult blood in the stool sample. I was glutened at the time.

Also forgot to mention, the colonoscopy is not for diagnosis, it's due to the blood.

In terms of formal diagnosis, I have refused the blood test and the endo due to not wanting to be glutened for the blood test and the high degree of false positives in both tests. My doc and I diagnosed, informally, based on the positive results with a gluten free diet. More testing and diagnosing may come soon.

Emilushka Contributor
Emilushka
Posted

I got both ends scoped. They didn't have the Celiac diagnosis yet and were still trying to figure out what's what.

Celiac disease doesn't increase your chances of colorectal cancer, which is what they were most concerned with when they found the occult blood was positive. So don't worry - your Celiac disease isn't making that any worse!

The worst part of the colonoscopy is drinking the Miralax. Yuck. I got it down by chasing with sips of Sprite. The actual procedure isn't bad because you don't remember. YAY!

luvs2eat Collaborator
luvs2eat
Posted

When I was diagnosed, my GI doc ordered blood work and scheduled a colonoscopy because I was 49... very close to the age they'd have scheduled an initial screening. The screening had nothing to do w/ damage caused by celiac as that would be seen in the small intestine anyhow.

He was also a GI doc who didn't believe in total sedation. I wasn't upset or nervous at all as I'd seen many "scopes" in my nurse's training. Actually, I was fascinated watching the whole thing and asking questions. I was completely awake and there was such mild discomfort... it just wasn't bad at all. As it turned out, having the colonoscopy had nothing to do w/ my being diagnosed (by bloodwork) w/ celiac disease.

Early detection is the key in colon issues. Please try not to be afraid... the prep is the worst part and that's just not so bad!

cassP Contributor
cassP
Posted

i think its a good idea to get one- i did and it put my mind to ease. Undiagnosed Celiac can potentially lead to all kinds of issues- so it cant hurt to get checked.

i was very happy to get mine done- because with all the pain i was having, i just wanted to make sure i didnt have anything else like diverticulitis, or cancer... i only had 1 benign polyp- and they removed it right there. easy. plus, my hemmohroids are really bad- (external AND internal)- so it was good to get the doctor's expert opinion on those.

and now that im gluten free and still in my 30s, i probably wont worry about getting one for years.

i would like to get an endo at some point just to make sure everything's ok there too.

it's a fairly easy procedure- except that i (unlike most people) had painful gas for a good 4 days.

i think it's a good idea to get it. Dr. Oz just got one on tv- as a "routine" and an "example" for others- he had no idea he would have precancerous polyps everywhere- they remove them all right there- it really is a great way to prevent anything serious.

gf-soph Apprentice
gf-soph
Posted

I had a colonoscopy about 18 months after going gluten free as I still had gi problems and persistent iron and B12 deficiency. They were looking for Crohn's. Luckily I don't have it, but they did find a precancerous polyp which is very uncommon for my age, 25. I now will need to have a colonoscopy every 3 years, as the polyps take about 5 years to turn cancerous it means that they wont have the chance and I will be protected. I do have a family history of bowel cancer but they wouldn't have started screening me until 40, by then it would have been cancerous. So I was lucky to find it!

I think it's wise to get the procedure done to be sure that the blood is nothing serious. The prep for it is awful but I didn't remember anything about the procedure at all, so I'm not bothered by that. I wouldn't stress too much about finding anything nasty, I have heard that there are a couple of cancers that are slightly higher in untreated celiacs, but I don't think bowel cancer was one of them. There are also a lot of reasons for blood in the stool that are a lot less scary.

One thing that my gastro raised is that the bowel prep removes almost everything from your system. That makes immediately after a great time to repopulate the bowel with friendly bacteria. He had me use VSL#3 which is expensive, but has been evaluated in some medical trials and is high strength. If you can take a good probiotic it might be a kick start to restoring a good gut balance.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Mexican Trailrunner Rookie
Mexican Trailrunner
Posted
  • Author

Thanks SO much for your comments.

Marilyn

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      My only proof

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      My only proof

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      Gluten related ??

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      KAN-101 Treatment for Coeliac Disease

      By Russ H · Posted

      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      Nicotine Gum For Gluten Symptoms.. Am I Crazy?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.