Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ignore Blood Test, If Biopsy Negative?

Lunabell

Recommended Posts

Lunabell Apprentice
Lunabell
Posted

Laura had her endo/biopsy yesterday. Her dr's partner did it since we wanted to sneak it in before the end of year. We met our deductible ages ago.;)

We discussed what to do if the biopsy came back negative. He said that he tells his patients to ignore the blood work if the biopsy is negative. Does this sound like good advice?

Laura has not had anything containing gluten since December 10th. Her GI knew that I was going to that after her last horrendous reaction to eating gluten. I felt it was child abuse to knowingly cause her such pain. The dr was fine with that and felt she wouldn't completely heal in 19 days.

Since Laura went gluten-free, she has not had a single stomach ache, she is running around like mad with bounds of energy and even weathered a cold without needing to be nebbed. It seems to me that it would be stupid to ignore a positive blood test and observed improvement on a gluten-free diet if the biopsy comes back negative.

If we do have a negative biopsy, I will be talking this over with my daughter's actual GI. I am not sure I should trust this other dr's advice.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


sa1937 Community Regular
sa1937
Posted

His advice does not sound good to me. If the blood tests were positive and the biopsy is negative, especially with her positive response to the gluten-free diet, I think you already have your answer.

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

Sure. Ignore the blood test, but pay attention to your daughter. If she feels better not eating gluten, then go with that.

CeliaCupCake Apprentice
CeliaCupCake
Posted

I totally agree with sa1937 and Jestgar.

My blood test came back positive (not significantly high, but positive nevertheless) and I've recently received the biopsy result which is negative. I've been gluten free for a couple of weeks now with some improvement. I won't be seeing my GI for quite some time, so he conveyed a messaged to me via his secretary to take it that I have celiacs considering the positive blood test and response to a gluten-free diet, and to continue with the gluten-free diet until I see him again.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

No you shouldn't ignore the blood test. There are too many false negatives with both blood and biopsy. If she is gluten free that almost insures a false negative. If she has been doing better on the gluten free diet keep her on it.

Lunabell Apprentice
Lunabell
Posted
  • Author

I am not going to ignore the positive changes that I have seen in Laura. It just seemed like very cavalier advice about something that is very serious. Thanks for all of the input. I guess I hoped a GI would take this more seriously. I am glad he is not our regular doctor.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

I am not going to ignore the positive changes that I have seen in Laura. It just seemed like very cavalier advice about something that is very serious. Thanks for all of the input. I guess I hoped a GI would take this more seriously. I am glad he is not our regular doctor.

As I said in a previous post, these doctors do not have to suffer the consequences of their cavalier advice. We should be able to wave our magic wands and transfer the symptoms to them when they make such stupid recommendations. :P

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


T.H. Community Regular
T.H.
Posted

And actually, there has been some recent research suggesting you do just the opposite of your doctor's advice!

Here's the abstract of a recent study:

Open Original Shared Link

They were looking at people with negative biopsies (but other symptoms, positive blood test, etc...), and finding that they still showed metabolic differences from a healthy person's body. Their conclusion would seem to apply to your child's case, "Our results demonstrate that metabolic alterations may precede the development of small intestinal villous atrophy and provide a further rationale for early institution of GFD [gluten free diet] in patients with potential celiac disease, as recently suggested by prospective clinical studies."

This article explains a little more about their results:

Open Original Shared Link

What they said was this: "The data suggest that 'potential celiac disease subjects are, indeed, not potential at all. They ... appear metabolically similar to overt celiac disease ... without any histological evidence of intestinal damage.' "

So if the blood test was positive, and it's clear that going off gluten is helping, it sounds like you're doing the right thing to ignore the ignorant doc's advice.

rosetapper23 Explorer
rosetapper23
Posted

That gastro gave you the WRONG advice, so I'm glad you're willing to overlook it. According to leading celiac expert Dr. Alessio Fasano, results of biopsies can be notoriously incorrect because the damage can be beyond the reach of the scope, the surgeon may not have biopsied a damaged section, and/or the pathologist is not experienced/skilled enough to determine if there has been villi damage. As long as your daughter's blood test is positive and her symptoms resolve on a gluten-free diet, you have your answer--she has celiac.

Judy3 Contributor
Judy3
Posted

My original blood tests were negative so they did the genetic tests on me. My doctor (a GI) said he goes by symptoms and response to the gluten free diet and then when my genetic tests came back positive for DQ2 he said no question it's Celiac. He didn't do a biopsy as he did the endoscope and colonscopy prior to suspecting Celiac but he told me that nothing makes a digestive system look that raw and irritated but Celiac. So there are some doctors out there that are aware that the tests have false negatives and the biopsies are not particularly accurate either. I was sick for months before they did all those tests and wasn't keeping anything down and living on cottage cheese and jello so he expected my tests to be negative. I'm glad I have a doctor that goes by symptoms and what he sees with his own eyes and my response to the gluten free diet over a lab test!!!

:D

Lunabell Apprentice
Lunabell
Posted
  • Author

Back after a computer crash! I guess it was good that I picked something else than a new laptop for Christmas because I ended with both!

This question is a moot point. Laura's biopsies came back positive also. The nurse who called thought she was dropping a bomb on me. She was so confused when she found out we were already up and running on a gluten-free diet. Things had been going very well for Laura until she traded pretzels the other day in school. If there had been any ambiguity about her testing, it was pretty obvious the least couple of days that gluten makes her life miserable. Poor kid. I bet she won't trade food again anytime soon.

Sarah B Apprentice
Sarah B
Posted

That gastro gave you the WRONG advice, so I'm glad you're willing to overlook it. According to leading celiac expert Dr. Alessio Fasano, results of biopsies can be notoriously incorrect because the damage can be beyond the reach of the scope, the surgeon may not have biopsied a damaged section, and/or the pathologist is not experienced/skilled enough to determine if there has been villi damage. As long as your daughter's blood test is positive and her symptoms resolve on a gluten-free diet, you have your answer--she has celiac.

SOme of you might know, my biopsy came back negative but I have a positive blood test.

My GI doctor said that in celiac patients, the damage is always located closer to the stumach. When I asked him if there could have been farther down or that he didn't go far enough, he told me absoluty not. Has there been test to show that there is damage to the small intestine farther down then normal?

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

SOme of you might know, my biopsy came back negative but I have a positive blood test.

My GI doctor said that in celiac patients, the damage is always located closer to the stumach. When I asked him if there could have been farther down or that he didn't go far enough, he told me absoluty not. Has there been test to show that there is damage to the small intestine farther down then normal?

I don't know that it's ever been studied. Ask your doctor for the reports/papers that show what he's saying to be true.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

SOme of you might know, my biopsy came back negative but I have a positive blood test.

My GI doctor said that in celiac patients, the damage is always located closer to the stumach. When I asked him if there could have been farther down or that he didn't go far enough, he told me absoluty not. Has there been test to show that there is damage to the small intestine farther down then normal?

False negatives on biopsies are not uncommon. You have a positive blood test for a reason. Damage can be patchy and be missed if they don't biopsy the right place. Since you had a postive blood test you do need to get on the diet strictly.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. SamAlvi
      - SamAlvi replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

      Thanks again for the detailed explanation. Just to clarify, I actually did have my initial tests done while I was still consuming gluten. I stopped eating gluten only after those tests were completed, and it has now been about 70 days since I went gluten-free. I understand the limitations around diagnosing NCGS and the importance of antibody testing...
    2. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

      Blood tests for thiamine are unreliable. The nutrients from your food get absorbed into the bloodstream and travel around the body. So, a steak dinner can falsely raise thiamine blood levels in the following days. Besides, thiamine is utilized inside cells where stores of thiamine are impossible to measure. A better test to ask for is the Erythrocyte...
    3. lizzie42
      - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

      Neither of them were anemic 6 months after the Celiac diagnosis. His other vitamin levels (d, B12) were never low. My daughters levels were normal after the first 6 months. Is the thiamine test just called thiamine?
    4. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

      Yes, I do think they need a Thiamine supplement at least. Especially since they eat red meat only occasionally. Most fruits and vegetables are not good sources of Thiamine. Legumes (beans) do contain thiamine. Fruits and veggies do have some of the other B vitamins, but thiamine B 1 and Cobalamine B12 are mostly found in meats. Meat, especially organ...
    5. lizzie42
      - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

      Thank you! That's helpful. My kids eat very little processed food. Tons of fruit, vegetables, cheese, eggs and occasional red meat. We do a lot of rice and bean bowls, stir fry, etc. Do you think with all the fruits and vegetables they need a vitamin supplement? I feel like their diet is pretty healthy and balanced with very limited processed food....
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,872
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Koyanna
    Newest Member
    Koyanna
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • SamAlvi
      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

      By SamAlvi · Posted

      Thanks again for the detailed explanation. Just to clarify, I actually did have my initial tests done while I was still consuming gluten. I stopped eating gluten only after those tests were completed, and it has now been about 70 days since I went gluten-free. I understand the limitations around diagnosing NCGS and the importance of antibody testing and biopsy for celiac disease. Unfortunately, where I live, access to comprehensive testing (including total IgA and endoscopy with biopsy) is limited, which makes things more complicated. Your explanation about small-bowel damage, nutrient absorption, and iron-deficiency anemia still aligns closely with my history, and it’s been very helpful in understanding what may be going on. I don't wanna get Endoscopy and I can't start eating Gluten again because it's hurt really with severe diarrhea.  I appreciate you taking the time to share such detailed and informative guidance. Thank you so much for this detailed and thoughtful response. I really appreciate you pointing out the relationship between anemia and antibody patterns, and how the high DGP IgG still supports celiac disease in my case. A gluten challenge isn’t something I feel safe attempting due to how severe my reactions were, so your suggestion about genetic testing makes a lot of sense. I’ll look into whether HLA testing is available where I live and discuss it with my doctor. I also appreciate you mentioning gastrointestinal beriberi and thiamine deficiency. This isn’t something any of my doctors have discussed with me, and given my symptoms and nutritional history, it’s definitely worth raising with them. I’ll also ask about correcting deficiencies more comprehensively, including B vitamins alongside iron. Thanks again for sharing your knowledge and taking the time to help. I’ll update the forum as I make progress.
    • knitty kitty
      Son's legs shaking

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Blood tests for thiamine are unreliable.  The nutrients from your food get absorbed into the bloodstream and travel around the body.  So, a steak dinner can falsely raise thiamine blood levels in the following days.  Besides, thiamine is utilized inside cells where stores of thiamine are impossible to measure. A better test to ask for is the Erythrocyte Transketolace Activity test.  But even that test has been questioned as to accuracy.  It is expensive and takes time to do.   Because of the discrepancies with thiamine tests and urgency with correcting thiamine deficiency, the World Health Organization recommends giving thiamine for several weeks and looking for health improvement.  Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.   Many doctors are not given sufficient education in nutrition and deficiency symptoms, and may not be familiar with how often they occur in Celiac disease.  B12 and Vitamin D can be stored for as long as a year in the liver, so not having deficiencies in these two vitamins is not a good indicator of the status of the other seven water soluble B vitamins.  It is possible to have deficiency symptoms BEFORE there's changes in the blood levels.   Ask your doctor about Benfotiamine, a form of thiamine that is better absorbed than Thiamine Mononitrate.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many vitamins because it is shelf-stable, a form of thiamine that won't break down sitting around on a store shelf.  This form is difficult for the body to turn into a usable form.  Only thirty percent is absorbed in the intestine, and less is actually used.   Thiamine interacts with all of the other B vitamins, so they should all be supplemented together.  Magnesium is needed to make life sustaining enzymes with thiamine, so a magnesium supplement should be added if magnesium levels are low.   Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  There's no harm in trying.
    • lizzie42
      Son's legs shaking

      By lizzie42 · Posted

      Neither of them were anemic 6 months after the Celiac diagnosis. His other vitamin levels (d, B12) were never low. My daughters levels were normal after the first 6 months. Is the thiamine test just called thiamine? 
    • knitty kitty
      Son's legs shaking

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Yes, I do think they need a Thiamine supplement at least. Especially since they eat red meat only occasionally. Most fruits and vegetables are not good sources of Thiamine.  Legumes (beans) do contain thiamine.  Fruits and veggies do have some of the other B vitamins, but thiamine B 1 and  Cobalamine B12 are mostly found in meats.  Meat, especially organ meats like liver, are the best sources of Thiamine, B12, and the six other B vitamins and important minerals like iron.   Thiamine has antibacterial and antiviral properties.  Thiamine is important to our immune systems.  We need more thiamine when we're physically ill or injured, when we're under stress emotionally, and when we exercise, especially outside in hot weather.  We need thiamine and other B vitamins like Niacin B 3 to keep our gastrointestinal tract healthy.  We can't store thiamine for very long.  We can get low in thiamine within three days.  Symptoms can appear suddenly when a high carbohydrate diet is consumed.  (Rice and beans are high in carbohydrates.)  A twenty percent increase in dietary thiamine causes an eighty percent increase in brain function, so symptoms can wax and wane depending on what one eats.  The earliest symptoms like fatigue and anxiety are easily contributed to other things or life events and dismissed.   Correcting nutritional deficiencies needs to be done quickly, especially in children, so their growth isn't stunted.  Nutritional deficiencies can affect intelligence.  Vitamin D deficiency can cause short stature and poor bone formation.   Is your son taking anything for the anemia?  Is the anemia caused by B12 or iron deficiency?  
    • lizzie42
      Son's legs shaking

      By lizzie42 · Posted

      Thank you! That's helpful. My kids eat very little processed food. Tons of fruit, vegetables, cheese, eggs and occasional red meat. We do a lot of rice and bean bowls, stir fry, etc.  Do you think with all the fruits and vegetables they need a vitamin supplement? I feel like their diet is pretty healthy and balanced with very limited processed food. The only processed food they eat regularly is a bowl of Cheerios here and there.  Could shaking legs be a symptom of just a one-time gluten exposure? I guess there's no way to know for sure if they're getting absolutely zero exposure because they do go to school a couple times a week. We do homeschool but my son does a shared school 2x a week and my daughter does a morning Pre-K 3 x a week.  At home our entire house is strictly gluten free and it is extremely rare for us to eat out. If we eat at someone else's house I usually just bring their food. When we have play dates we bring all the snacks, etc. I try to be really careful since they're still growing. They also, of course, catch kids viruses all the time so I  want to make sure I know whether they're just sick or they've had gluten. It can be pretty confusing when they're pretty young to even be explaining their symptoms! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.