Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Tests For Food Allergy Found Inaccurate


lcarter

Recommended Posts

lcarter Contributor

BLOOD TESTS for FOOD ALLERGY FOUND INACCURATE

Primary source: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Source reference:

Spears G, et al "Over-reliance on serum testing for IgE to food allergens results in inappropriate food elimination diets" J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123: S179.

By John Gever, Senior Editor, MedPage Today

Published: March 16, 2009

Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

WASHINGTON, March 16 -- Common blood tests for food-specific serum immunoglobulins are often wrong about allergies and aren't a good basis for restricting youngsters' diets, researchers said here.

Results of supervised oral food challenges in 125 children failed to support most diagnoses of food allergies made on the basis of serum IgE testing, David Fleischer, M.D., of National Jewish Health in Denver, told the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. These challenges -- in which children observed by professionals are fed increasing amounts of suspect foods over time to gauge their reactions -- were performed on 63 foods being withheld from the children. Of those, 57 were negative. Dr. Fleischer and colleagues concluded that, in the absence of anaphylaxis, oral food challenges should be used to confirm food allergy status. Unfortunately, physicians say, these tests are expensive, time consuming, and may require the facilities of a specialized center.

The Denver study included one boy who had 32 different foods removed from his diet, leaving him unable to eat any ordinary foods. He has passed all 25 food challenge tests performed so far, and is now eating relatively normal meals with his family, Dr Fleisher said. Dr. Fleischer said the boy will undergo additional challenges on more foods. He said the child probably has some genuine food allergies and will require some dietary restrictions.

The investigators did not perform food challenges in children with diagnosed tree-nut allergies. Nor did they conduct challenges for other foods when the children had "convincing" previous evidence of reaction or extremely high food-specific serum IgE levels. Consequently, few children with diagnoses of peanut allergies and none with soy allergies underwent food challenges. However, in five challenges that were performed on children with putative peanut allergy, all had negative results.

Food challenges were most likely to confirm serum IgE-based diagnoses of wheat allergy. Of six oral food challenges performed, three were positive and three were negative.

In most other cases, the oral-challenge produced negative results, and children were able to resume eating those foods. Dr. Fleischer said the chief problem with moving toward the more accurate food challenge is the wide commercial availability of IgE-based food allergy diagnostic panels. Melanie Gleason, P.A., of National Jewish Health, who also worked on the study, said parents and community physicians are often too quick to remove food from a child's diet after a positive result from these tests.

Dr. Fleischer said serum IgE is only partially reflective of actual allergy, and that children often have high serum IgE levels across the board. That can lead to positive results for a given allergen even though the child can, in fact, tolerate the food. As a result, food allergies should be confirmed with supervised food challenges, he said, particularly when children are being subjected to life-changing dietary restrictions.

Hugh Sampson, M.D., an allergist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, agreed that food challenges are needed to confirm initial diagnoses. "Too many people are relying on a blood test or a skin test, which do not have a high level of specificity," he said. "They [only] tell you what to suspect." However, Dr. Fleischer said medically supervised food challenges are beyond the capabilities of most community allergists or primary care physicians. He recommended that patients be referred to specialized centers, he said. Dr. Sampson noted that there is a small amount of risk in such testing, and it can be expensive and time-consuming.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



frieze Community Regular

What is Dr Fleisher's agenda, and what is the payor source for the article/research?

psawyer Proficient

This article is about food allergies, not autoimmune reactions. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition, not an allergy. The referenced tests measure IgE levels. Tests for celiac disease measure IgA and IgG levels.

Skylark Collaborator

What is Dr Fleisher's agenda, and what is the payor source for the article/research?

You act as if this is new and exciting. Allergy testing has never been viewed as accurate by specialists. Problem is, overworked GPs and family practice docs order blood panels and fail to follow up with challenges because they can take a lot of time. Blood IgE is little better than the old practice of skin testing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,496
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pwick
    Newest Member
    Pwick
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It looks like their most recent clinical trial just finished up on 5-22-2025.
    • Fabrizio
      Dear Scott,  please check the link https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05574010?intr=KAN-101&rank=1 What do you think about it?
    • Scott Adams
      KAN‑101 is still very much in development and being actively studied. It has not been dropped—rather, it is advancing through Phases 1 and 2, moving toward what could become the first disease‑modifying treatment for celiac disease. https://anokion.com/press_releases/anokion-announces-positive-symptom-data-from-its-phase-2-trial-evaluating-kan-101-for-the-treatment-of-celiac-disease/ 
    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine interacts with all the other B vitamins.  Thiamine and B 6 make a very important enzyme together. With more thiamine and other vitamins available from the supplements your body is absorbing the ones you need more of.  The body can control which vitamins to absorb or not.  You're absorbing more and it's being transported through the blood.   It's common to have both a Thiamine and a Pyridoxine deficiency.  Keep taking the B Complex. This is why it's best to stop taking supplements for six to eight weeks before testing vitamin levels.  
    • badastronaut
      Yes I took a supplement that had B6 in it, low dosage though. I've stopped taking that. B1 doesn't affect other B vitamin levels? 
×
×
  • Create New...