Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gi Specialist Says It's Not Celiac


Melstar23

Recommended Posts

Melstar23 Apprentice

I saw a GI specialist today and the hospital. I have been waiting many months to see him and after this I don't have anymore answers.

I have been suspicious of celiac as I was getting severe pain on my left side, floating yellow stools, bloating, wind, tiredness. All of which has resolved since I have cut out gluten and return worse even when I have a little bit, and now I also get diarrhoea.

I have had a stack of blood test and scans for all sorts of things, everything thing has come back negative. I was found to have the Celiac gene, but my Celiac panel and gastroscope biopsies are completely negative. (I was 4 months gluten free when I had these tests and all the doctors/specialists are aware of this.)

The GI specialist said that I am definitely not celiac based on the blood tests and gastroscope biopsies and the fact that my pain was on the left side, and he doesn't think I should be avoiding gluten. He said I shouldn't worry about cross contamination, and if he was me he would probably avoid wheat if he felt it improved quality of life, but would try eating again other sources of gluten. He said I shouldn't get caught up in the gluten free lifestyle, worry about eating out or getting tricked into wasting my money on gluten-free products because I am not celiac.

I'm not sure what to do, I was so sick 5 months ago and I really thought I had found my answer. I guess I can try and add it back into my diet and see how it goes. My partner thinks I should stay gluten free because he knows how sick I was before and what a big difference it has been since I changed my diet. This whole experience has been depressing, I am just left feeling that doctors have no idea what is happening most of the time and the don't care. I really have lost faith in the medical profession.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

You are not celiac, and you shouldn't get caught up in the gluten free lifestyle, but you can't eat gluten :unsure:

Of course everything was negative if you were not eating gluten - and it may well have been negative even if you had been, because you may be gluten intolerant rather than diagnosable celiac.

With apologies to Scott because this is the Celiac.com forum, but I am becoming more and more of the opinion that celiac is just a tip of the gluten intolerance iceberg which encompasses something more, something bigger, the elephant in the room that no one can see.

It is, of course, your choice whether or not you wish to consume gluten; you do not need to have the doctor's permission. The blood and biopsy tests have known false negative rates of about 20%. If I were you I would stay gluten free and healthy. Just my two and a half cents worth.

starrytrekchic Apprentice

The blood tests don't mean anything and shouldn't even be considered in your diagnosis with you having been gluten free before them for four months. The biopsy results don't mean much either.

Stay gluten free. You feel better that way, so why would you go back to gluten? You don't need an official diagnosis for anything, and if you find you do, you can always do a gluten challenge in the future and retake the bloodtest.

Skylark Collaborator

Trust your body, not tests that were done after you were gluten-free for four months and feeling better. If you feel that much better gluten free, who cares whether a dude in a white coat with an overpriced diploma pronounces you celiac?

Maggie Mermaid Apprentice

Listen to your body. If you feel better when you avoid wheat, then avoid wheat. Stephen Wangen's book "Healthier Without Wheat" discusses Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance which could be your situation. You can be gluten-intolerant and not meet the classical signs of being celiac. Just saying. Not doctors have the latest and greatest information.

nora-n Rookie

Yopu have a celiac gene, and got better after going gluten free.

Of course the blood tests went negative after going gluten free.

some people in circumstances like this get tested by Enterolab, privately. Teier tests are very sensitive, but they cannot diagnose celiac, just gluten sensitivity.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Of course your tests were negative, you have been gluten free for months and healed. Listen to your body not that doctor. The same thing happened to someone in my family. Instead of telling you that you should go back to a gluten diet the doctor should have congratulated you for how well you are doing on it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Melstar23 Apprentice

Thanks for everyone's replies. I am just frustrated by the lack of support that I have from doctors. This specialist only saw me once yesterday. I've been well for about 5 months now with only short relapses when I have not been as careful with my diet. My main GP told me that I had Gluten Intolerance, but I could eat gluten sometimes. Then he gave me some printouts about Gluten Intolerance which said that it was probably psychological issues with food. Then I found another GP, who said that my symptoms matched Celiac, but since my Celiac tests came back negative it could IBS caused by stress and she started going on about how she thought my job in a call centre would be really stressful (occassionally it is, but most of the time it is an easy job) and asking me about problems with my partner (there are none). Then there was this specialist... he also made a point of commenting that I must work in a really stressful environment. Why can't they believe that the diet has worked? I feel like I know better what is happening with my body than they do and in the end I have wasted so much time and money looking for reassurance to get nothing.

Since I have given up gluten, I have found out that two of my Auntie's have had abdominal pains and other GI symptoms since they have been in their 30's (they are in their 60's now) and have been told by doctors that there is nothing wrong with them, pain, bloating and regular bouts of diarrhoea/constipation is just someting that you have to live with. Doctors ask me about my family history, but then they dismiss it because no one has an official diagnosis.

Sorry about the rant, I just needed to get my frustration out.

Does anyone know if there is no damage in the intestines from gluten, does that mean the other health problems associated with celiac are not at risk if small amount do get consumed? I would like to believe what the specialist has said about not worrying about my reactions after cross-contamination. I feel like have gone crazy, my body is telling me I should trust my gut, but my brain still wants to believe these dr's have said. :angry:

mushroom Proficient

Trust your gut! You know your body better than someone in a white coat does - you live in it every day. And if the white coats don't know that the tests are meaningless in someone who is gluten free for four months, well, they shouldn't be wearing those white coats. Do what makes you well.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Trust your gut! You know your body better than someone in a white coat does - you live in it every day. And if the white coats don't know that the tests are meaningless in someone who is gluten free for four months, well, they shouldn't be wearing those white coats. Do what makes you well.

Yea I agree. Some doctors are less than worthless when it comes to celiac. These doctors make me so darn angry!!!!!

Takala Enthusiast

I wonder if by any chance this one is related to the Neurologist From H*ll.

Oh My God, caught up in the gluten free lifestyle !

I'm heading into year 8 on that with no official diagnosis, but I was so far gone there were holes in my head, literally, brain lesions, and they were still calling me a head case.

Just stick to the gluten free diet as strictly as possible. You are hereby granted permission to enjoy the rest of your life.

Of course if any of these peeps are listed on one of those dr. ratings websites you could rate them.... ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - elisejunker44 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Schar's products contain wheat!

    2. - knitty kitty replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      322

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    3. - Known1 replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      20

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

    4. - knitty kitty replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      20

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,597
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Caroline Alexandria
    Newest Member
    Caroline Alexandria
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine Mononitrate is "shelf stable" and won't break down easily when exposed to heat, light and over time.  This makes it very hard for the body to absorb and utilize it.  Only thirty percent is absorbed, less is utilized because it takes additional thiamine to break it down.   Thiamine Hydrochloride is great.  Benfotiamine is wonderful, too.   Retaining water, edema, is a symptom of low thiamine.  I'd bloat up like a puffer fish.   The ingrown toenail problems I had that I attribute to Niacin deficiency and Vitamin C deficiency.  My toenails curled in and grew thick and yellow, thickened heels.  It was awful.   So glad you're going to give thiamine hydrochloride a try!   Let me know how it goes.  You may feel worse before you feel better, the thiamine paradox, but it does clear up.  It's like a car back firing if it hasn't been run for a while.   Thiamine and benfotiamine: Focus on their therapeutic potential https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/
    • Known1
      Thanks again, I'll keep pressing on.  🤞
    • knitty kitty
      @Known1, Search for "niacin flush fades the longer you use it" and "Niacin flush worse if deficient".   It takes a couple to three weeks for the body to adjust and you're at that point now, so things should improve. Riboflavin makes the neon color, which glows under black light.  If not absorbed, excreted.  Absorption of riboflavin will improve as the body starts healing the intestinal lining and villi grow back.   You could skip the multivitamin instead.  
    • HectorConvector
      The conversion factor for mg/dl and mmol/L is 18. So 5 = 90, 7 = 126, and so on. In the US, blood sugar regulations now are the same as what we use in the UK except for this difference in units. In terms of how they compare in the past, the numbers today that I quoted are stricter than they used to be. Blood sugar numbers for +1 and +2 hour postprandial are measured from the beginning of a meal in these official numbers. In regards to the thiamin supplement I have: it says it is thiamine mononitrate. I had not until now been aware there were different types (it seems I find that is the case with everything, including the magnesium I take!) and this one I have is the only one available in my local stores. I know it makes my pee smell strong when I take it which would seem to indicate my body is absorbing enough that the remainder gets ejected, but I could be wrong. Of course, I'm willing to try anything reasonable to correct this long standing condition, whatever it might be so I will try and get thiamin hydrochloride. Back on the note of diabetes (potentially) I haven't had the blood test for a while and I did notice ingrown toenail type infections a few times in the last 3 years that kept coming back. I heard that diabetes caused high urination. But eating sugar and elevated blood sugar causes the opposite in me. If I eat a lot of sugar I retain water, like big time. If I ate a bunch o sugar in the afternoon say, I can produce little enough urine that I can go over 12 hours and have nowhere near enough urine to need to void in that time or longer which seems abnormal.       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.