Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

German Pancake Help


waterlily-

Recommended Posts

waterlily- Explorer

So I tried out my recipe for a german pancake and the dough (as usual with all the pancake recipes I've tried) came out really thick and stiff. I baked it anyways just to see and it didn't fully bake in the middle. (as usual) I can't figure this out! if I add more liquid it gets all rubbery. Anyone know what to do??

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Have you tried adding something like applesauce? Adding moisture, but better texture...

lizard00 Enthusiast

can you post the recipe? it helps when we can see it. :)

i have a recipe for german pancakes. i'll have to check it out and compare the two.

waterlily- Explorer

can you post the recipe? it helps when we can see it. :)

i have a recipe for german pancakes. i'll have to check it out and compare the two.

Sure! Here it is,

2 eggs

1/2 cup milk

1 1/2 tbs. butter

1/2 rice flour

1 tsp. xanthan gum

1/4 tsp. salt

1 1/2 tbs. cornstarch

Put butter in a cold cake or pie pan in the oven and turn it on to 400 degrees. While oven is heating, beat eggs & add milk. combine dry ingredients in a separate container, mixing well, then set aside.

Once over is preheated mic the dry ingredients in to the wet and remove pan from oven. use a pastry brush to butter the sides then ass in the pancake batter.

Bake for 25-30 minutes until golden brown & puffy.

Now my oven runs hot so I have to turn it down 25 degrees for everything, so I let this bake about 40 minutes all together because I pulled it out once to test it and saw it wasn't fully baked and put it in for another 10 minutes with no change except to the bottom which was really crunchy. So my main problem is the center, it just won't fully bake.

Marlie Apprentice

Sure! Here it is,

2 eggs

1/2 cup milk

1 1/2 tbs. butter

1/2 rice flour

1 tsp. xanthan gum

1/4 tsp. salt

1 1/2 tbs. cornstarch

Put butter in a cold cake or pie pan in the oven and turn it on to 400 degrees. While oven is heating, beat eggs & add milk. combine dry ingredients in a separate container, mixing well, then set aside.

Once over is preheated mic the dry ingredients in to the wet and remove pan from oven. use a pastry brush to butter the sides then ass in the pancake batter.

Bake for 25-30 minutes until golden brown & puffy.

Now my oven runs hot so I have to turn it down 25 degrees for everything, so I let this bake about 40 minutes all together because I pulled it out once to test it and saw it wasn't fully baked and put it in for another 10 minutes with no change except to the bottom which was really crunchy. So my main problem is the center, it just won't fully bake.

Marlie Apprentice

We're quite new at this, but we have been making some great pancakes but we noticed if we don't sift the flour it turns into rubber. Also we tend to use a mixture of flours like superfine white rice, tapicoa and potato starch with good results. You might also want to reduce the xantham gum to like a 1/4 teaspoon.

We are newbies but have been baking, baking and more baking with plenty of disasters.

Best of luck.

mushroom Proficient

I agree with Marlie that single flour recipes seldom produce a desirable result (except for almond flour - and I made almond pancakes once and they were a disaster!). Gluten free flours seem to work best in combination, either a combination of the different starches (rice, corn, tapioca, potato, arrowroot) or one or more starches with a more substantial flour like buckwheat or sorghum, millet, amaranth.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sa1937 Community Regular

I've used this recipe for German Pancakes and they turned out fine. I did use more butter than the recipes called for. Open Original Shared Link

waterlily- Explorer

I agree with Marlie that single flour recipes seldom produce a desirable result (except for almond flour - and I made almond pancakes once and they were a disaster!). Gluten free flours seem to work best in combination, either a combination of the different starches (rice, corn, tapioca, potato, arrowroot) or one or more starches with a more substantial flour like buckwheat or sorghum, millet, amaranth.

I have some of those, I'll try it out again. Thanks all!2

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Here's another recipe you could try: Open Original Shared Link

If you don't need it to be dairy free, just use milk and butter instead of rice milk and coconut oil. The proportionas of this recipe are MUCH different than the one you are working with-- maybe it will work out better with the greater number of eggs.

lizard00 Enthusiast

I agree with the other poster, that amount of xanthan is waaaaay too much. Pancakes require very little xanthan (around 1/4 t or so per C of flour. Mine has more eggs, too. Like around 4 or 6, can't remember.

For regular pancakes, I let my batter sit for 5 minutes, while the pan is heating up. Then I check the consistency, and usually have to add water to make it more liquid.

Mushroom- I made pancakes with almond flour and hazelnut flour. It was a bit tricky, but they were pretty good.

waterlily- Explorer

I tried the recipe again last night with less xanthan, & a mix of flours. It wasn't as rubbery and a little less thick this time. So I guess I just have to keep experimenting with it for it to turn out right.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,703
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bobbie Jean
    Newest Member
    Bobbie Jean
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...