Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Tests - Why Is My Gp Sending Me To A Rheumatologist First?

Sunflower Girl

By Sunflower Girl
in Doctors

Recommended Posts

Sunflower Girl Newbie
Sunflower Girl
Posted

Has anyone had a similar experience?

After experiencing some symptoms and hearing that there can be a link between Hashimoto's (which I have) and celiac, I asked my PCP to test me for celiac. A few days later, I received a call from his office that my celiac blood tests were positive, and that they are now working on a referral for me to see a rheumatologist. My doctor has left for a vacation, so I can't follow up with him to find out why my next step is not a biopsy? (As I have now read over and over is the norm.)

If you've been through this, would you please share some insight with me? I would really appreciate some info. to calm my nerves a bit!

I noticed others on these boards post their test results and other related information to paint a complete picture, so I will, too.

TEST/// RESULT/// REFERENCE INTERVAL

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA/// 25/// Weak Positive 20 - 30

" IgG/// 30/// Weak Positive 20 - 30

tTG IgA/// 20/// Positive >10

tTg IgG/// 8/// Weak Positive 6 - 9

Endomysial Antibody IgA/// Positive Abnormal/// Negative

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum/// 211/// 70 - 400

My paternal grandmother and my father had hypothyroidism; my sister has both Hashimoto's and celiac, so there are definitely genetic factors at work here. I've had five negative biopsies on nodules in my thyroid.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

Ugh. Honestly I think your GP just might not know that a GI is better informed than a rheumatologist when it comes to celiac. (actually I think a car mechanic is better infOrmed about medicine than a rheumatologist, but I'm a bitter angry girl!)

If you only want confIrmation of celiac, you might call back and assert yourself by Insisting on a GI doc. I bet with a history of AI disorders in your family, your GP assumed a rheum would be fine. A GI doc is who'd do a biopsy anyway, so why waste time with a rheum if you don't need to yet?

Good luck.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I'm guessing your doc is thinking a rheumatologist because they specialize in autoimmunity. You are right that what you need is a GI for a biopsy.

I've read a lot of medical literature, and everything I've read suggests that you're definitely celiac with the positive endomysial antibodies and deamidated gliadin. There are some articles that argue that a biopsy is not even necessary with such clear test results. If you do want the biopsy you need to keep eating gluten to get an accurate test. I think it would also be reasonable to accept a celiac diagnosis, decline a referral, and stop eating gluten based on the blood tests.

Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

I agree with skylark! While a biopsy/endoscopy isn't the worst test in the world, it's really knd of redundant in this case. Unless you have concerns about diagnosing ulcers or h. pylori.

Jenniferxgfx Contributor
Jenniferxgfx
Posted

Oh and I forgot to say mine gave me nightmares even though I was sedated. I wouldn't suggest if if you can avoid it. :/

cassP Contributor
cassP
Posted

ya, i agree... i think the biopsy is pointless. you're positive enough. plus u have Hashimoto's.. u need to avoid gluten anyways. you're totally positive in my opinion. if i were in your shoes, i wouldnt need any more proof.

the big question is why she's sending u to a rheumi?? unless she wants to cover all the basis and test for ALL the AI diseases... but that's not very common in this country for them to be so thorough and on top of things. and all your test results were Celiac tests... i didnt see anything on there that would suggest to look for other diseases. do u have any other weird symptoms & questions that would point to looking at other things???

ya i agree with everyone above- and i would call and ask why she's sending u to a Rheumi... maybe she just had a little brain fog that day :blink:

cahill Collaborator
cahill
Posted

Has anyone had a similar experience?

After experiencing some symptoms and hearing that there can be a link between Hashimoto's (which I have) and celiac, I asked my PCP to test me for celiac. A few days later, I received a call from his office that my celiac blood tests were positive, and that they are now working on a referral for me to see a rheumatologist. My doctor has left for a vacation, so I can't follow up with him to find out why my next step is not a biopsy? (As I have now read over and over is the norm.)

If you've been through this, would you please share some insight with me? I would really appreciate some info. to calm my nerves a bit!

I noticed others on these boards post their test results and other related information to paint a complete picture, so I will, too.

TEST/// RESULT/// REFERENCE INTERVAL

Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgA/// 25/// Weak Positive 20 - 30

" IgG/// 30/// Weak Positive 20 - 30

tTG IgA/// 20/// Positive >10

tTg IgG/// 8/// Weak Positive 6 - 9

Endomysial Antibody IgA/// Positive Abnormal/// Negative

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum/// 211/// 70 - 400

My paternal grandmother and my father had hypothyroidism; my sister has both Hashimoto's and celiac, so there are definitely genetic factors at work here. I've had five negative biopsies on nodules in my thyroid.

were these the only tests you had done?? did your doc run an ANA also??

If you had a positive ANA that would be a reason for your doc to send you to a rheumatologist.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Sunflower Girl Newbie
Sunflower Girl
Posted
  • Author

were these the only tests you had done?? did your doc run an ANA also??

If you had a positive ANA that would be a reason for your doc to send you to a rheumatologist.

Thank you to everyone who responded; I sincerely appreciate it. This is just the information I needed.

As far as I know, I did not have the ANA test (I'll have to google that one to see what that is) as there was no mention of it on the lab results.

luvs2eat Collaborator
luvs2eat
Posted

It was a mildly elevated ANA that sent me to a rheum. several years after my celiac diagnosis. It's a LUPUS marker. I was blood tested every 6 months for almost 2 years and examined by the rheum. doctor. My blood level never changed and I had no symptoms so I didn't need to go any longer.

cassP Contributor
cassP
Posted

It was a mildly elevated ANA that sent me to a rheum. several years after my celiac diagnosis. It's a LUPUS marker. I was blood tested every 6 months for almost 2 years and examined by the rheum. doctor. My blood level never changed and I had no symptoms so I didn't need to go any longer.

i went to a Rheumy for 2 years too- when i was a teenager- for my elevated speckled ANA... just wanted to specify that it's just a marker for Autoimmune Disease.. not specifically Lupus. they thought i had lupus too- cause i had a butterfly rash, and the positive ANA. they also tested me for Sjorgens- i think because the way it looks- if it's speckled or not can point to different AI diseases.

unfortunately- even tho i was NEGATIVE for both- they just decided to leave it an EFFING MYSTERY- when they could have picked up the Hashimoto's i believe. i dont think my Grave's or Celiac abs were up yet... but i really hate our medical system. it's designed to keep us sick and guessing :angry:

if i was born in Italy- they would have told my mom before i left the hospital that i had 2 Dq8s...

im so over it

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Thank you to everyone who responded; I sincerely appreciate it. This is just the information I needed.

As far as I know, I did not have the ANA test (I'll have to google that one to see what that is) as there was no mention of it on the lab results.

There is no reason to do ANA (antinuclear antibodies) with a celiac panel. That one is run if you have symptoms of other autoimmune diseases like lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjogren's syndrome.

cahill Collaborator
cahill
Posted

There is no reason to do ANA (antinuclear antibodies) with a celiac panel. That one is run if you have symptoms of other autoimmune diseases like lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjogren's syndrome.

I agree that there is no reason to do an ANA with a celiac panel but with a diagnoses of or symptoms of autoimmune diseases ( such as hashimoto's and celiac's) some doctors will run an ANA as a precaution.

My endocrinologist does an ANA as part of the initial workup on new patients ( along with celiac panal,RA,hashimotos,vitamin D Levels,renal function ect...

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted

i went to a Rheumy for 2 years too- when i was a teenager- for my elevated speckled ANA... just wanted to specify that it's just a marker for Autoimmune Disease.. not specifically Lupus. they thought i had lupus too- cause i had a butterfly rash, and the positive ANA. they also tested me for Sjorgens- i think because the way it looks- if it's speckled or not can point to different AI diseases.

unfortunately- even tho i was NEGATIVE for both- they just decided to leave it an EFFING MYSTERY- when they could have picked up the Hashimoto's i believe. i dont think my Grave's or Celiac abs were up yet... but i really hate our medical system. it's designed to keep us sick and guessing :angry:

if i was born in Italy- they would have told my mom before i left the hospital that i had 2 Dq8s...

im so over it

I don't think they automatically do DNA testing in Italy. I read and heard from Italians that they test kids under the age of 5 IF there is Celiac in the family or they have symptoms. Their medicine is no better than ours. It's also socialized medicine so testing is not done so routinely. I really don't think it matters where you are...doctors only ever look for cancer and if you don't have that, you'll have to figure out your problems on your own because they won't do it for you! Europe may be more savvy regarding Celiac but that doesn't mean the diagnosis rates are much better than in other parts of the world. Plus, there is just too much resistance from people when it comes to changing their diets a bit.

love2travel Mentor
love2travel
Posted

I don't think they automatically do DNA testing in Italy. I read and heard from Italians that they test kids under the age of 5 IF there is Celiac in the family or they have symptoms. Their medicine is no better than ours. It's also socialized medicine so testing is not done so routinely. I really don't think it matters where you are...doctors only ever look for cancer and if you don't have that, you'll have to figure out your problems on your own because they won't do it for you! Europe may be more savvy regarding Celiac but that doesn't mean the diagnosis rates are much better than in other parts of the world. Plus, there is just too much resistance from people when it comes to changing their diets a bit.

When we were recently in Italy we were told by a medical professional that it is mandatory for everyone to be tested for celiac disease by the age of 5.

cassP Contributor
cassP
Posted

I don't think they automatically do DNA testing in Italy. I read and heard from Italians that they test kids under the age of 5 IF there is Celiac in the family or they have symptoms. Their medicine is no better than ours. It's also socialized medicine so testing is not done so routinely. I really don't think it matters where you are...doctors only ever look for cancer and if you don't have that, you'll have to figure out your problems on your own because they won't do it for you! Europe may be more savvy regarding Celiac but that doesn't mean the diagnosis rates are much better than in other parts of the world. Plus, there is just too much resistance from people when it comes to changing their diets a bit.

i believe it's Finland where the diagnosis rate for Celiac is around 70%. that's certainly better than our 2 or 3 %. it's all about money really- and Big Pharma doesnt make money off us- that's why it's not a priority here. there's pros and cons to all the different "1st world" countries no doubt. and while im very proud of how America makes it possible for us to be cutting edge sometimes... our health care system is really designed to keep us sick.

  • 3 weeks later...
Krystalcatt Newbie
Krystalcatt
Posted

Hi;

About the rheumatologist - for me she's a blessing. I go to a naturopath who ran a urine test and that came back suggesting celiac. Last year's food allergy test came back avoid grains etc. So I went to my MD. He's good too, but busy. Was willing to run a celiac test, but only ran (I believe it's called) EMA which he called me and said it's negative. End of story - with him.

Luckly I had a coming appoint with my Rheum. and I asked her to run a celiac panel and a few more that I found mentioned here (thank you) Not only did she run H pylori, vit d, cal, mag, etc.... she ran a host of others I didn't come up with.

I went back to my naturopath and asked her to run a pancrea test and CA marker. (I think if I would have asked my Rheum she might of run these also)

I am thankful my Rheum is/was so willing to run the blood work. I have started no gluten/dairy/eggs/grains (started again - showed on the original year ago allergy test) as I did feel better when I was on it. No matter what the rest of the blood work comes back, I know I'm better off without it. And considering I am sero-negative RA, I could possibly be sero-negative celiac.

Glad to have found this site - thank you for all your help!

Krystalcatt

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. xxnonamexx
      - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      I read that as well but I saw the Certified Gluten free symbol that is the reason I ourchased it.
    2. cristiana
      - cristiana replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

      I agree, it so often overlooked! I live in the UK and I have often wondered why doctors are so reluctant to at least exclude it - my thoughts are perhaps the particular tests are expensive for the NHS, so therefore saved for people with 'obvious' symptoms. I was diagnosed in 2013 and was told immediately that my parents, sibling and children should...
    3. chrisinpa
      - chrisinpa commented on Scott Adams's article in Skin Problems and Celiac Disease
      2

      Celiac Disease and Skin Disorders: Exploring a Genetic Connection

      Maybe they can attribute certain skin conditions to either being susceptible to getting Celiac......or the other way around....but I have to ask if certain people are prone to Celiac because of genetics and some people aren't. It's kind of the same thing as what came first.....the chicken or the egg.?
    4. knitty kitty
      - knitty kitty replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      @xxnonamexx, There's labeling on those Trubar gluten free high fiber protein bars that say: "Manufactured in a facility that also processes peanuts, milk, soy, fish, WHEAT, sesame, and other tree nuts." You may want to avoid products made in shared facilities. If you are trying to add more fiber to your diet to ease constipation, considering...
    5. trents
      - trents replied to sha1091a's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Issues before diagnosis

      Welcome to celiac.com @sha1091a! Your experience is a very common one. Celiac disease is one the most underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed medical conditions out there. The reasons are numerous. One key one is that its symptoms mimic so many other diseases. Another is ignorance on the part of the medical community with regard to the range of symptoms that celiac...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,694
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Aanhmcbride
    Newest Member
    Aanhmcbride
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By xxnonamexx · Posted

      I read that as well but I saw the Certified Gluten free symbol that is the reason I ourchased it.
    • cristiana
      Issues before diagnosis

      By cristiana · Posted

      I agree, it so often overlooked! I live in the UK and I have often wondered why doctors are so reluctant to at least exclude it - my thoughts are perhaps the particular tests are expensive for the NHS, so therefore saved for people with 'obvious' symptoms.  I was diagnosed in 2013 and was told immediately that my parents, sibling and children should be checked.  My parents' GP to this day has not put forward my father for testing, and my mother was never tested in her lifetime, despite the fact that they both have some interesting symptoms/family history that reflect they might have coeliac disease (Dad - extreme bloating, and his Mum clearly had autoimmune issues, albeit undiagnosed as such; Mum - osteoporosis, anxiety).  I am now my father' legal guardian and suspecting my parents may have forgotten to ask their GP for a test (which is entirely possible!) I put it to his last GP that he ought to be tested.  He looked at Dad's blood results and purely because he was not anemic said he wasn't a coeliac.  Hopefully as the awareness of Coeliac Disease spreads among the general public, people will be able to advocate for themselves.  It is hard because in the UK the NHS is very stretched, but the fallout from not being diagnosed in a timely fashion will only cost the NHS more money. Interestingly, a complete aside, I met someone recently whose son was diagnosed (I think she said he was 8).  At a recent birthday party with 8 guests, 4 boys out of the 8 had received diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, which is an astounding statistic  As far as I know, though, they had all had obvious gastric symptoms leading to their NHS diagnosis.  In my own case I had  acute onset anxiety, hypnopompic hallucinations (vivid hallucinations upon waking),  odd liver function, anxiety, headaches, ulcers and low iron but it wasn't until the gastric symptoms hit me that a GP thought to do coeliac testing, and my numbers were through the roof.  As @trents says, by the grace of God I was diagnosed, and the diet has pretty much dealt with most of those symptoms.  I have much to be grateful for. Cristiana
    • knitty kitty
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @xxnonamexx, There's labeling on those Trubar gluten free high fiber protein bars that say: "Manufactured in a facility that also processes peanuts, milk, soy, fish, WHEAT, sesame, and other tree nuts." You may want to avoid products made in shared facilities.   If you are trying to add more fiber to your diet to ease constipation, considering eating more leafy green vegetables and cruciferous vegetables.  Not only are these high in fiber, they also are good sources of magnesium.  Many newly diagnosed are low in magnesium and B vitamins and suffer with constipation.  Thiamine Vitamin B1 and magnesium work together.  Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine has been shown to improve intestinal health.  Thiamine and magnesium are important to gastrointestinal health and function.  
    • trents
      Issues before diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to celiac.com @sha1091a! Your experience is a very common one. Celiac disease is one the most underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed medical conditions out there. The reasons are numerous. One key one is that its symptoms mimic so many other diseases. Another is ignorance on the part of the medical community with regard to the range of symptoms that celiac disease can produce. Clinicians often are only looking for classic GI symptoms and are unaware of the many other subsystems in the body that can be damaged before classic GI symptoms manifest, if ever they do. Many celiacs are of the "silent" variety and have few if any GI symptoms while all along, damage is being done to their bodies. In my case, the original symptoms were elevated liver enzymes which I endured for 13 years before I was diagnosed with celiac disease. By the grace of God my liver was not destroyed. It is common for the onset of the disease to happen 10 years before you ever get a diagnosis. Thankfully, that is slowly changing as there has developed more awareness on the part of both the medical community and the public in the past 20 years or so. Blessings!
    • knitty kitty
      Dizziness after eating green beans?

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @EndlessSummer, You said you had an allergy to trees.  People with Birch Allergy can react to green beans (in the legume family) and other vegetables, as well as some fruits.  Look into Oral Allergy Syndrome which can occur at a higher rate in Celiac Disease.   Switching to a low histamine diet for a while can give your body time to rid itself of the extra histamine the body makes with Celiac disease and histamine consumed in the diet.   Vitamin C and the eight B vitamins are needed to help the body clear histamine.   Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.