Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Testing For Celiac


peeptoad

Recommended Posts

peeptoad Apprentice

The blood test (or buccal swabs I think can also be used) that look for HLA DQ2 and DQ8 are often used to test for celiac disease, yes?

I think it is an accurate way to determine one's risk for celiac, but not necessarily whether one actually has the disease? (is this correct?)

Anyway, my GI doctor mentioned this test to me last year, but basically told me that it wasn't worth testing because I am adopted (and therefore do not know any genetic history, etc). Does this sound right? I mean, what difference would it make if I don't know anybody biologically related to me? The test would still be a predictor of the disease wouldn't it?

IDK, I guess I'm just trying to figure out if I would benefit from any additional testing. (probably not; I'm almost at the point of giving up on all doctors to help me with this)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Genetic testing can be part of the diagnosis picture but there are more genes associated with celiac than just those 2. Also folks can have the genes and never develop celiac. The best test there is at present is a strict trial of the diet.

peeptoad Apprentice

Thanks. A trial of the diet is kind of what I figured would be the most accurate(and what you alluded to in another thread). Just wanted to check and see if there was something I was missing re: the genetic test. I've been losing faith in a lot of lab tests as of late... I guess a diagnosis of IBS will do that to a person.

JoshB Apprentice

You doc wants you to do a celiac blood test rather than a genetics test because even in the worst case for genetics results, it still does not mean you have celiac disease. It's more useful if you had close relatives, because if it might help you estimate risk for you family members.

There's certainly nothing stopping you from trying gluten free yourself, but I would think hard about it. If you do this you remove the opportunity to do a blood test or biopsy. Neither one will operate properly unless you have been eating gluten for two or three months. So, if you have continuing trouble you will be stuck in limbo wonder if you just aren't properly eating gluten free, or if you just haven't been on the diet long enough. Get the blood test now and handle those doubts.

shadowicewolf Proficient

not all celiacs have the genes for it (i'm thinking 2-3%?).

It helps paint a picture as it were.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,016
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lia Minish
    Newest Member
    Lia Minish
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      As I recall Canada created some special rules just for gluten-free oats--not other gluten-free products--right around the time that General Mills launched their gluten-free Cheerios. The move seemed more politically motivated given that other products could be 20 ppm or below, but not oats. Here is an article we wrote at the time:  
    • trents
      @Winnie-Ther-Pooh, we are talking about two different standards here. In the U.S, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set the standard for using "Gluten-Free" in product advertising at less than 20 ppm of gluten. There is another standard, an internationally-recognized one, known as "Certified Gluten-Free" which is stricter, requiring less than 10 ppm of gluten. Certified Gluten-Free products will bear the GFCO logo. But in either case, it is important to understand that there still may be some gluten in the product which, for the super-sensitive subset of the celiac community, may still cause reactions.
    • Scott Adams
      I second that motion! Franz Gluten Free may not be in all Costco's--perhaps in the Western USA only? It's my go to bread for our family because it is whole grain, tastes great, has reasonable sized slices, and is only ~$5 per loaf (sold in twin packs where each loaf is vacuum packed). Most other breads are a lot more expensive.
    • Winnie-Ther-Pooh
      I didn't realize that they weren't certified. I looked on their website and they say that they test their product to be below 20ppm but when you click on the link THEY provide about their certification process, it goes to their main page. Their website in Canada is very bad... (deliberately?). (no English translation sorry) https://www.bobsredmill.ca/produit/flocons-davoine-a-lancienne-sans-gluten  
    • Beverage
      I was diagnosed with Celiacs in 2015. I come from ethnic backgrounds that regularly drink a few glasses of wine or beer with dinner every night. Now that I have been gluten free for 10 years, I definitely have noticed that I gradually wanted that less and less. Now I just have 1 glass with Sunday dinner, and do not want more. Maybe I have just gotten out of the habit, ritual, or maybe my body is telling me. I do feel better overall though.
×
×
  • Create New...