Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Interesting Doctor Appt

AmandaD

By AmandaD
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted

Hi guys - I want your opinion. :D

I'm 35 and when in for my good old regular physical (I see a gastro yearly who just checks to make sure I'm following my diet and usually runs vitamin d, diabetes and thyroid checks). My general practitioner said "Now with Celiac you can eat rice, yes? Milk?" And then she mentioned that she wondered if I should be followed up with a COLONOSCOPY because celiac can cause colon cancer.

I think I was sort of stupefied. I let her know that I see my gastroenterologist yearly and the last time I saw her she said I didn't need to come in until October of 2012 to say HI.

So I called my gastro doc today and she said she didn't feel I needed a colonoscopy or anything like that - that I was doing good and that I need to see her again in October of 2012.

Am I crazy or is my general practitioner not understanding celiac? Help.

(P.S. When I was first diagnosed in 2005 they did a sigmoidoscopy, TTG test and bloodwork, then an endoscopy. The sigmoidoscopy showed nothing serious - a noncancerous little polyp that was no big deal; the bloodwork showed celiac and the endoscopy showed Marsh II changes consistent with Celiac)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

Your doctor seems about as knowledgeable as your average doctor.

Hey, maybe that's why it's so hard to get a celiac dx, a lot don't know what they're talking about????

Don't feel bad, I had a "thyroid" doctor tell me Armour was a bovine derivative.

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Well, not to be a worrywart, but if you are prone to developing polyps, and we do know that noncancerous can become precancerous and then can become tumors, I think it would be prudent to get a colonoscopy done because they can reach farther than a sigmoidoscopy and potentially prevent any problems down the line. I would discuss it with my GI.

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted
  • Author

To be clear it wasn't a true polyp, it was a small inflammatory growth from infection. Sorry if I wasn't clear.

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted

Hi guys - I want your opinion. :D

I'm 35 and when in for my good old regular physical (I see a gastro yearly who just checks to make sure I'm following my diet and usually runs vitamin d, diabetes and thyroid checks). My general practitioner said "Now with Celiac you can eat rice, yes? Milk?" And then she mentioned that she wondered if I should be followed up with a COLONOSCOPY because celiac can cause colon cancer.

I think I was sort of stupefied. I let her know that I see my gastroenterologist yearly and the last time I saw her she said I didn't need to come in until October of 2012 to say HI.

So I called my gastro doc today and she said she didn't feel I needed a colonoscopy or anything like that - that I was doing good and that I need to see her again in October of 2012.

Am I crazy or is my general practitioner not understanding celiac? Help.

(P.S. When I was first diagnosed in 2005 they did a sigmoidoscopy, TTG test and bloodwork, then an endoscopy. The sigmoidoscopy showed nothing serious - a noncancerous little polyp that was no big deal; the bloodwork showed celiac and the endoscopy showed Marsh II changes consistent with Celiac)

I think if you have undiagnosed Celiac for a very long time and don't know you have it, your intestinal tract can become inflamed all the way down.

Inflammation in the body is a big factor in some cancers so maybe, just maybe, if you never find out you have celiac disease or are diagnosed and continue to eat gluten, you may end up with a problem. If you follow a strict gluten-free diet and heal well, have no strong family history of colon cancer and there is no blood in your stool, then don't worry about it. Doctors are too pushy for colonoscopies these days because they make good money from doing them. Have your doctor do an occult stool test to see if there is any blood and if not, there should be no reason to do one.

I am 52 and have healed really well. I have never had a colonoscopy and don't plan on having one unless I fail one of the lesser tests, as mentioned above. My family are blessed in that we have little to no cancer, going back many generations, on both sides. We have a boatload of autoimmune issues but no cancer. You are young....I would follow your GI docs advice.

StephanieL Enthusiast
StephanieL
Posted

I thought Celiac did increase your risk of colon cancer?

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted
  • Author

No. The most recent research says it does not.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


StephanieL Enthusiast
StephanieL
Posted

No. The most recent research says it does not.

Thanks! Good to know!

AmandaD Community Regular
AmandaD
Posted
  • Author

Here ya go: https://www.celiac.com/articles/22452/1/Celiac-Disease-Carries-No-Higher-Risk-of-Colorectal-Cancer/Page1.html

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,116
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Mary Pack
    Newest Member
    Mary Pack
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By trents · Posted

      I assume that you already know that genetic testing for celiac disease cannot be used to confirm a celiac diagnosis. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. It can be used to rule out celiac disease with a high degree of confidence, however, in the case where the genetic testing is negative for the genes. Until and unless you are actually diagnosed with celiac disease I would not raise this as an issue with family. However, if you are diagnosed with celiac disease through blood antibody testing and/or endoscopy with positive biopsy I would suggest you encourage first degree relatives to also purse testing because there is a significant chance (somewhere betwee 10% and almost 50%, depending on which studies you reference) that they will also have or will develop active celiac disease. Often, there are symptoms are absent or very minor until damage to the small bowel lining or other body systems becomes significant so be prepared that they may blow you off. We call this "silent celiac disease". 
    • trents
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      If you were off gluten for two months that would have been long enough to invalidate the celiac blood antibody testing. Many people make the same mistake. They experiment with the gluten free diet before seeking formal testing. Once you remove gluten from the diet the antibodies stop being produced and those that are already in circulation begin to be removed and often drop below detectable levels. To pursue valid testing for celiac disease you would need to resume gluten consumption equivalent to the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks, preferably longer. These are the most recent guidelines for the "gluten challenge". Without formal testing there is no way to distinguish between celiac disease and gluten sensitivity since their symptoms overlap. However, celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the small bowel lining, not true of gluten sensitivity. There is no test available for gluten sensitivity so celiac disease must first be ruled out. By the way, elevated liver enzymes was what led to my celiac diagnosis almost 25 years ago.
    • trents
      High DGP-A with normal IGA

      By trents · Posted

      Then it does not seem to me that a gluten-related disorder is at the heart of your problems, unless that is, you have refractory celiac disease. But you did not answer my question about how long you had been eating gluten free before you had the blood antibody test for celiac disease done.
    • Xravith
      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?

      By Xravith · Posted

      My genetic test results have arrived - I’m homozygous for DQB1*02, meaning I have HLA-DQ2. I’ve read that this is one of the genes most strongly associated with celiac disease, and my symptoms are very clear. I’m relieved that the results finally arrived, as I was getting quite worried since my symptoms have been getting worse. Next step, blood test. What do these results imply? What should I tell my family? I’m concerned that this genetic predisposition might also affect other family members.
    • Roses8721
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      Two months. In extreme situations like this where it’s clearly a smoking gun? I’m in LA so went to a very big hospital for pcp and gi and nutritionist 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.