Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab Results Are So Confusing!

21daisygurl

Recommended Posts

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted

I am SO glad I found this forum!

I have had gastro issues my whole life and despite mentioning it to my doc, noone did any further testing. I have long suspected I am gluten sensitive since I react to gluten products. However, my family doc suggested I see a naturopath to do an elimination diet to see if it really is gluten or something else I am sensitive to. Just for kicks, she threw in some blood work and we were both surprised it came back abnormal.

Here are just the celiac ones I had done (I know there are other tests but these are the ones I had run):

IgA: 1.90 (range 0.69-3.82)

Gliadin IgA: 3.5 (range <11.99)

Gliadin IgG: 23.2 (HIGH) (range <11.99)

Transglutaminase IgA: 2.3 (range <9.99)

In addition my Iron and hemoglobin were low, and my ESR was double the max normal range. Suggesting there is inflammation and probably a bleed.

I know from my research that the Transglutaminase is more specific for celiac, but if my Gliadin is positive, wouldn't that mean I react to gluten? So what is the point of doing a biopsy if I know I react to gluten? And only one of the gliadin immunoglobulins was positive - why not both?

Is the biopsy worth having done? I am waiting to hear from a gastroenterologist but all this is so confusing - I could use some help!

I can't make any diet changes till the biopsy is done - but I don't want my gut to get more damaged than it clearly already is (judging by the inflammation and bleeding).

Thoughts?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


alicewa Contributor
alicewa
Posted

It's a question we all ask ourselves. I had the whole lot done except for the gene test. I was positive for tTG as well as IgG Gliadin and had a positive endoscopy.

Your case doesn't sound as serious as mine. You may have a normal biopsy as a matter of fact due to tTG being normal.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You can have all those tests come back negative and still be very, very ill from celiac. You can also have a false negative on the biopsies. No matter what the results of the biopsy you need to go gluten free when that test is done. Whether you want to have the biopsy done is up to you. Your doctor may give you an official diagnosis with positive blood work and remission of symptoms on the diet. If an official diagnosis is of value to you and you are reluctant to have the endo you could talk to your doctor about diagnosing that way.

Do stay on gluten until all the celiac related tests you choose to do are done and then get on the diet.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

alicewa Contributor
alicewa
Posted

Here's are two videos by Rodney Ford. It's definitely worth the 10 minutes in total or so to watch them because he talks about a girl who is in a similar situation to yours. The second one talks about various gluten tests and how they work.

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

Are false negatives worse with labs than the biopsy?

I'd say if the original poster has been eating gluten all along, she might as well have the biopsy if she can.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I woud suggest getting the new deaminated gliadin tests done, both the IgA and IgG versions, since we have had several people here with symptoms and negative ttg, but positive DGP.

That one is very specific for celiac and can pick up patchy celiac.

The ttg test is very bad at picking up patchy celiac.

Patchy celiac is the most common for of celiac nowadays.

peeptoad Apprentice
peeptoad
Posted

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

I think so. Antibody production can also build up so a low positive on a celiac test could go into a strong postive down the line. IMHO even if the antibodies are at low levels it is wise to drop what is causing the antibodies rather than continueing to injest until your antibodies reach high levels.

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted
  • Author

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

AH this is what I was getting at in my OP. Since my body clearly produces antibodies against gluten, whether or not I am celiac shouldn't matter, so much as the fact that my gut is leaky to gluten, correct?

I am going to go watch those video's posted - I appreciate the opinions. I hope I get in to see the specialist soon!

peeptoad Apprentice
peeptoad
Posted

I think so. Antibody production can also build up so a low positive on a celiac test could go into a strong postive down the line. IMHO even if the antibodies are at low levels it is wise to drop what is causing the antibodies rather than continueing to injest until your antibodies reach high levels.

Now, that makes sense... B)

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

The usual antibody in the intestines is IgA since you have normal IgA. IgG is an antibody more associated with allergy, if anything. People can have IgG antibodies to foods and nothing happens at all when they eat them because the food doesn't get to the bloodstream to react with the IgG. Other people are quite sensitive to their IgG foods.

You need the biopsy to know whether you're celiac and the IgA just doesn't happen to be making it into the bloodstream, or whether you're gluten intolerant and not having autoimmune problems. (A nicer situation because there isn't the cancer risk.)

mash Newbie
mash
Posted

My understanding is that IgG is actually a kind of "transient" intolerance as opposed to a lifelong one. Read this document: Open Original Shared Link).pdf where they explain that once your IgG test comes back positive, they will take you off a specific foodstuff for a while and then make a decision on whether or not to reintroduce it.

With Celiac Disease (lifelong intolerance), they are only really looking at IgG if you are IgA deficient.

So yes, you probably need to cut out the gluten, but it might not be for the rest of your life, you might be able to reintroduce it and then test again?

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Mash, SOME celiacs do show IgG in blood, but there is also IgA in the mucosa and damage. The only way to know is the biopsy. Agreed that IgG is more often associated with intolerance, and that some IgG intolerance can be transient.

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted
  • Author

My understanding is that IgG is actually a kind of "transient" intolerance as opposed to a lifelong one. Read this document: Open Original Shared Link).pdf where they explain that once your IgG test comes back positive, they will take you off a specific foodstuff for a while and then make a decision on whether or not to reintroduce it.

With Celiac Disease (lifelong intolerance), they are only really looking at IgG if you are IgA deficient.

So yes, you probably need to cut out the gluten, but it might not be for the rest of your life, you might be able to reintroduce it and then test again?

Thank you for that document! That sounds exactly right - I did have an inflammatory response based on the bloodwork so this delayed food allergies and chronic complaints sounds like me for sure.

Still haven't heard from the gastroenterologist but I am really enjoying reading all of your different thoughts on this. I really appreciate the constant insight. I am learning so much from you guys.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,349
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Bradballentinenc
    Newest Member
    Bradballentinenc
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Confused About Results

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Ginger38, Diabetes and Celiac often go hand in hand.  Having more than one autoimmune disease is common with Celiac.  I'd err on the side of caution and go gluten free.   I did not want to go on insulin, either.  I got my diabetes under control by following the low histamine version of the Autoimmune Protocol Diet (Dr. Sarah Ballantyne).  My diet now does include carbs.   We're supporting you through this difficult time.  
    • knitty kitty
      This Roller Coaster Ride Needs to Stop

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Ginger38,  I've been there with horrible symptoms and diarrhea accidents and diabetes and the insulin conundrum!  My doctors were just as frustrating!   I had nutritional deficiencies.  I know your doctors refuse to test for this.  So did mine, saying "I can't make money prescribing vitamins."  Some members say a naturopathic doctor is more open to testing for deficiencies.  Remember not to start supplementing until after testing is done.  Otherwise the supplements will raise your blood levels falsely.   I had studied Nutrition at university, so I decided to supplement essential vitamins and minerals.  A B Complex, extra Thiamine (Benfotiamine) for the diabetes, magnesium and Vitamin D are the supplements I started with.   The B vitamins are water soluble so any excess is excreted easily.  Thiamine even in high doses is safe and nontoxic.  Diabetics lose more thiamine in urine because of weird kidney stuff.   I wanted to get my blood glucose levels under control because gluten free foods made my level spike for long periods, too.  I absolutely did not want to go on insulin.  Once you do, the pancreas stops making it.  Very scary.  Best to help the pancreas function with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine. I began the low histamine version of the Autoimmune Protocol Diet (developed by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, A Celiac herself).  It's a low carb, very strict diet at first, then expanded.  I considered it similar to feeding a sick baby.  You don't give hard to digest foods to a baby.  You give easily digestible foods.  This allows time for the gastrointestinal tract to calm down and heal.  Symptoms started to calm down quickly.  With the vitamins, I started feeling much better.  My blood glucose levels stabilized.  I did not go on insulin.  I do not take anti-glycemic pharmaceutical drugs like Metformin.  Just diet.  You're making the right decision to live as a Celiac.  Your body is telling you clearly.  You can get through this.  You're strong and you're fighting for yourself and your baby.  Good job!  You have the Tribe behind you!
    • maryannlove
      nuts.com -- no longer Celiac safe?

      By maryannlove · Posted

      Though trying to diligently eat gluten free, recent bloodwork was bad so searching for culprits.  Eat lot of (preferably mixed) nuts.  Most allergen labels say may be processed on equpment that also processes wheat, etc.  Finally found ONE kind (unsalted mixed) at BJ's.  Wessley (their store brand) that did not contain that warning.  Says in large letters "A GLUTEN FREE FOOD."  Well, all nuts are a gluten free FOOD!  Have been eating and now wonder if this is intentionally decieving.  So stopped eating until find culprit.  Nuts are so good for protein and fiber (especially if trying to not eat meat).  'Tis so frustrating.  Thanks to above, I'll look into Tierra Farms.   
    • somethinglikeolivia
      Am I celiac or not?

      By somethinglikeolivia · Posted

      Fascinating! This was very helpful, thanks for sharing
    • maryannlove
      Yasso frozen yogurt bars - be careful

      By maryannlove · Posted

      Despite being very diligent about eating gluten free, my recent bloodwork was bad.  So been on a mission to find the culprit(s).  During Covid my daughter found "certified gluten free" Yasso mint chocolate chip yogurt bars at Costco.  I was elated and have been eating them since.  When delving into possible culprits I discovered that the boxes with 12 bars at both Costco and BJ's no longer say "certified gluten free."  But the boxes with 4 bars at groceries and Target still say "certified gluten free."  Contacted the manufacturer and was told to go by what the box says.  So guess different machinery is used.  Was also told they were in the process of changing boxes.  Will be interesting to see what that brings.  
×
×
  • Create New...