Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Why Are Dr's Incompetent?

sariesue

Recommended Posts

sariesue Explorer
sariesue
Posted

Last year I finally got tired of feeling like crap all the time and had started to suspect celiac. So I went to my dr and he agreed based on my symptoms to test me. I was told that all my blood work results were normal but, was going to do the endoscopy with biopsies. Where he did a total of 8 biopsies, only two were in my small intestine. I was told the biopsies came back normal,so I continued looking for a different answer and was tested for food allergies. I am changing allergists next week and it restarted my desire to get an actual diagnosis. So I got copies of the blood work that was done as well as the endoscopy and pathology reports. I was shocked to find that the only somewhat relevant test that was done for testing for celiac was a b-12 test. Which was normal at 500 because I was already supplementing 1000 mcgs daily since july when the level was dropped to 205. I apparently never had the blood tests for celiac. And since I went completely gluten free several months ago and have no desire to eat gluten for several months to be tested. So I will never get a diagnosis. I just don't understand why the blood tests weren't done when I had to have blood drawn anyways. The way that blood work is done in that office is rather backwards too. They draw blood there and run what tests they can and send what they can't do off, so I never saw the slips of what tests were being done.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GlutenFreeSA Rookie
GlutenFreeSA
Posted

Last year I finally got tired of feeling like crap all the time and had started to suspect celiac. So I went to my dr and he agreed based on my symptoms to test me. I was told that all my blood work results were normal but, was going to do the endoscopy with biopsies. Where he did a total of 8 biopsies, only two were in my small intestine. I was told the biopsies came back normal,so I continued looking for a different answer and was tested for food allergies. I am changing allergists next week and it restarted my desire to get an actual diagnosis. So I got copies of the blood work that was done as well as the endoscopy and pathology reports. I was shocked to find that the only somewhat relevant test that was done for testing for celiac was a b-12 test. Which was normal at 500 because I was already supplementing 1000 mcgs daily since july when the level was dropped to 205. I apparently never had the blood tests for celiac. And since I went completely gluten free several months ago and have no desire to eat gluten for several months to be tested. So I will never get a diagnosis. I just don't understand why the blood tests weren't done when I had to have blood drawn anyways. The way that blood work is done in that office is rather backwards too. They draw blood there and run what tests they can and send what they can't do off, so I never saw the slips of what tests were being done.

I have been there - done that bought the T-shirt but not to come up for the doctors Celiac is known to be a chameleon throwing the doctors of the course. It is easily missed as the symptoms often show something not even remotely obvious as a gluten issue. a Blood test could revile a probability for Celiac BUT it has to be confirmed via biopsy. I have been with a gastroenterologist that claimed poisoning (Hello who did it my husband..) I think the bottom line is you need to spill all the beans, give a full profile, when talking to the doctor, explain all the issues and ask to be tested for Celiac. Most GP's do not know the first thing about Celiac thus "confuse" the symptoms with something ells. My advice to people not knowing if they have Celiac or not is: If first you do not get better from the doctors treatment find another doctor and ask to be referred to a specialist. We take for granted that doctors should know everything. We need to trust our instincts if the doctors diagnoses does not fit your gut feeling you are probably right get help from someone ells!!

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Last year I finally got tired of feeling like crap all the time and had started to suspect celiac. So I went to my dr and he agreed based on my symptoms to test me. I was told that all my blood work results were normal but, was going to do the endoscopy with biopsies. Where he did a total of 8 biopsies, only two were in my small intestine. I was told the biopsies came back normal,so I continued looking for a different answer and was tested for food allergies. I am changing allergists next week and it restarted my desire to get an actual diagnosis. So I got copies of the blood work that was done as well as the endoscopy and pathology reports. I was shocked to find that the only somewhat relevant test that was done for testing for celiac was a b-12 test. Which was normal at 500 because I was already supplementing 1000 mcgs daily since july when the level was dropped to 205. I apparently never had the blood tests for celiac. And since I went completely gluten free several months ago and have no desire to eat gluten for several months to be tested. So I will never get a diagnosis. I just don't understand why the blood tests weren't done when I had to have blood drawn anyways. The way that blood work is done in that office is rather backwards too. They draw blood there and run what tests they can and send what they can't do off, so I never saw the slips of what tests were being done.

Sounds like the doctor was not the greatest. Hopefully you don't still see him and have told him why. If the diet is helping you that is the most important thing though in the long run. Since false negatives on both blood and biopsy are all too common even if he ran the tests he was supposed to you still might not have gotten the answer that just doing the diet gives you.

sariesue Explorer
sariesue
Posted
  • Author

Sounds like the doctor was not the greatest. Hopefully you don't still see him and have told him why. If the diet is helping you that is the most important thing though in the long run. Since false negatives on both blood and biopsy are all too common even if he ran the tests he was supposed to you still might not have gotten the answer that just doing the diet gives you.

At the moment he is still my dr. Currently serving two functions he is my primary care dr and GI as he is board certified in both areas. Unfortunately it is hard to change because he is also my husband's dr as well. And he really likes him. But, I may try to find a female dr and use that as a guise for changing drs....

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

At the moment he is still my dr. Currently serving two functions he is my primary care dr and GI as he is board certified in both areas. Unfortunately it is hard to change because he is also my husband's dr as well. And he really likes him. But, I may try to find a female dr and use that as a guise for changing drs....

He may be board certified in both areas but it doesn't sound like he is proficient in either. If your husband isn't angry with your treatment IMHO he should be. Switching to another is going to be a good idea. You shouldn't have to have an excuse to do so but if you do use whatever reason works for you as this doctor sure doesn't.

Be sure to tell your new doctor your whole history and the results you have had on the diet. You may find a more savvy doctor gives you an 'unofficial' diagnosis based on recovery and your response to either deliberate or accidental challenges.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

some order the gene test from enterolab, and the stool test for antibodies can maybe pick up antibodies to gliadin several months after going gluten-free. Enterolab cannot diagnose celiac, just gluten sensitivity.

sariesue Explorer
sariesue
Posted
  • Author

Thanks, I know I need a new dr I just hate searching for them.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

I don't see any reason for you to stick with this doctor just because he is your husbands doctor. My husband and I have different doctors. While I am less than thrilled with his, he still sees him. I'm working with my husband to switch to the office I go to because of the incompentence from his. He is slowly seeing this now. Even then he will be seeing a partner in the group I go to not the same one. We don't even accompany each other to our appointments unless it is something we need to discuss together.

Di2011 Enthusiast
Di2011
Posted

Make sure you have of a copy of your medical records/results etc for any new doctor.

Can you get in touch with any people or support groups/societies in your area and ask for someone with a good reputation dealing with celiac/gluten intolerance?

beebs Enthusiast
beebs
Posted

Last year I finally got tired of feeling like crap all the time and had started to suspect celiac. So I went to my dr and he agreed based on my symptoms to test me. I was told that all my blood work results were normal but, was going to do the endoscopy with biopsies. Where he did a total of 8 biopsies, only two were in my small intestine. I was told the biopsies came back normal,so I continued looking for a different answer and was tested for food allergies. I am changing allergists next week and it restarted my desire to get an actual diagnosis. So I got copies of the blood work that was done as well as the endoscopy and pathology reports. I was shocked to find that the only somewhat relevant test that was done for testing for celiac was a b-12 test. Which was normal at 500 because I was already supplementing 1000 mcgs daily since july when the level was dropped to 205. I apparently never had the blood tests for celiac. And since I went completely gluten free several months ago and have no desire to eat gluten for several months to be tested. So I will never get a diagnosis. I just don't understand why the blood tests weren't done when I had to have blood drawn anyways. The way that blood work is done in that office is rather backwards too. They draw blood there and run what tests they can and send what they can't do off, so I never saw the slips of what tests were being done.

This sounds so similar to my story. As a precaution a few years back I had a celiac panel and genes test (my mother has it). The panel came back negative and the Dr told me my genes weren't the common ones so there was no way I could be celiac anyway. A few years later my symptoms started to come thick and fast - although not the usual type. I ended up seeing a GI for intussusception episodes but because my genes were negative he never ever entertained the thought of celiac. I went gluten free because I had nothing left to lose - my life changed and all of my crazy symptoms and severe GERD, the intussusception episodes etc stopped. Now if I ingest gluten I get intussusception every time. So bad. A few months ago I found out that the genes test was never done and the Dr just told me I was negative for the genes and I have no idea why - I think he must've forgotten to do them but didn't want to admit it! Now its clear that I am Celiac - I was talking to a bigwig celiac specialist the other day and the said he absolutely thinks I have celiac but I will never be able to get a proper diag - unless they bring in that new way of testing (applying the gliadin straight to the biopsies) but that could take years and years! I don't mind so much now that he has said that he knows that its celiac - I was having a lot of issues before when no-one believed that I was better being gluten-free because my genes were neg - now that they all know there was a mistake its ok and I don't have to keep explaining all the time. But geez - that Doctor lost me a diagnosis and caused me about 3 years of drs thinking I was insane!

shakemysoul Newbie
shakemysoul
Posted

This sounds so similar to me.. Although I went over 2 years of symptoms and through 3 different doctors that never even thought of celiac or tested anything relevant. I have no GI symptoms at all, but really they should know all symptoms to look for. My dad called me one day after doing research online and said I think you have Celiac. I brought it up to a nutrition specialist and he agreed and wanting to order tests, but I had already gone gluten-free. Wasn't about to go back after feeling so much better! Glad to know there are other "non-official" diagnoses out there!

shakemysoul Newbie
shakemysoul
Posted

I have also yet to find a new Primary Care Dr. It can be so frustrating!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.