Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Or Not?

Rachel--24

Recommended Posts

Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted

I gave my doctor my Enterolab results today and he accepts them as a diagnosis and was very apologetic for all I've gone through the past few years. Apparantly I'm the first patient he's ever had with this so he's wanting to do everything right. He was wanting me to get a biopsy but isn't this kinda useless since I don't have the Celiac gene? Also I've been mostly gluten-free for almost 4 months now...except for supplements and non-food sources. I think he was mostly concerned cuz I had a positive ttg but wouldn't that only indicate damage in someone with celiac disease? Anyways I'm more concerned about the malabsorption then anything else....Is there any point in having a biopsy done now? If anything I'd only want to have an endoscopy or colonoscopy done just to make sure nothing else is going on but I would think the chances of a positive biopsy would probably be slim to none.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted
I think he was mostly concerned cuz I had a positive ttg but wouldn't that only indicate damage in someone with celiac disease?
The tissue transglutamase test is highly specific for celiac disease, so if you're results were positive than you would most likely have celiac disease. If you have been mostly gluten-free for 4 months than a biopsy could come back false negative. You would have to go back on gluten for a few months if you wanted to damage the villi, but I don't think this is necessary if other tests have been positive. Some doctors, like mine do think it is necessary and I had to knowingly eat gluten for about 2 months. The biopsy does 100% prove that you have celiac disease if it is positive that is why many doctors want it done.
KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

I personally would not bother with a biopsy. It would be useless at this point since you have been gluten free for so long. You would have to get back on gluten for 3 months.

tTG is indicative of damage in the intestines.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
  • Author
The tissue transglutamase test is highly specific for celiac disease, so if you're results were positive than you would most likely have celiac disease.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't have the main gene for celiac disease so I'm thinking there can't be visible damage even if I were still eating gluten. There is no way I'm going back on gluten to find out for sure and my doctor doesnt want me to do that either since I was in very bad shape before I started this diet. He just wants me to do the biopsy anyway....I'm still kind of in the dark about the sensitivity vs. Celiac thing. I think if I had the Celiac gene I'd do the biopsy but since I don't I sorta think it would be useless. I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me. :unsure:

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted

I guess this a decision that only you and your doctor can make. Is there any way that the gene test was not accurate? Also, I believe that I have heard that a small percentage of people can have celiac without the gene, but I could be wrong (someone correct me on this if I am wrong).

I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me.
It's not that bad, the colonoscopy is WAY worse in my opinion, give me an endoscopy any day! I was awake for both <_<
Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
  • Author
It's not that bad, the colonoscopy is WAY worse in my opinion, give me an endoscopy any day! I was awake for both  <_<

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Wow...I thought the endoscopy was painful if they don't sedate you. I wouldn't try it awake for sure :blink:

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted
I don't have the main gene for celiac disease so I'm thinking there can't be visible damage even if I were still eating gluten. There is no way I'm going back on gluten to find out for sure and my doctor doesnt want me to do that either since I was in very bad shape before I started this diet. He just wants me to do the biopsy anyway....I'm still kind of in the dark about the sensitivity vs. Celiac thing. I think if I had the Celiac gene I'd do the biopsy but since I don't I sorta think it would be useless. I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me.  :unsure:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You don't have the *main* celiac gene, but the genes that have been identified to correlate to celiac so far only cover 90-95% of cases, NOT 100%.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted
Is there any way that the gene test was not accurate?

Yes, I have heard of that before. Doesn't usually happen but I believe that gluten intolerance can turn into celiac even without the gene. That would make sense too.

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted
Wow...I thought the endoscopy was painful if they don't sedate you. I wouldn't try it awake for sure

I was partially sedated for both, but I was awake and fully aware of everything. Sedation was an option for the endoscopy, some people do it with no sedation at all.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
  • Author

Thanks everyone,

I guess I'll just wait and see what the GI says. Believe it or not with all I've gone through the last few years I saw every specialist (more than once) except the GI doc. He was the LAST specialist I was sent to and only cuz I demanded it since I had lost so much weight and wasnt digesting my food. I saw him in April and all he did was send me for an AIDS test :unsure: What the heck??? At least I now know I'm not sick from AIDS. I was scheduled for the endoscopy/colonoscopy though but due to some confusion about the preperation (I drank the wrong stuff and got sick :rolleyes: ) the test was cancelled. I wish that wouldn't have happened because at that time I'd only been on the diet 3 weeks.

skbird Contributor
skbird
Posted

About the gene test being accurate - one of the genes I have is mostly associated with people of Medeterranean descent and since I'm 3/4 Dutch and the rest Welsh/Scot, I wrote in and asked if this could be a mistake. The reply I got was no - and that anyone in Europe could have crossed over a gene at some point. As you can see from my av, I don't *look* like I have any Medeterranean in me at all. :)

So I don't know if it's a mistake or not, in either of our cases. You certainly sound like you have Celiac. And an endoscopy probably wouldn't show damage at this point, though it still could - and at any rate it might be good just to check out everything else to make sure nothing else is up in your gut. It's a good idea.

Take care

Stephanie

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

Just my .02 cents... I personally do not think at this point the biopsy is necessary, it's not going to change anything one way or the other as far as you having to be gluten free. You know you have to be gluten free. IF you do not get any better after say 6 months with absolutely NO improvement, then look into further testing to see what else is wrong... But whether or not you have the biopsy is not going to change how you treat this. Strict Gluten Free diet period. Sounds like your dr. is just trying to do a CYA (covering his butt) after not getting it right before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especia...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can t...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams commented on knitty kitty's blog entry in Thiamine Thiamine Thiamine
      1

      About Celiac Remission

      This idea comes up often, but it’s important to separate theory from what’s actually supported by evidence. In celiac disease, the immune system does not “forget” gluten in a permanent or reliable way, even after long periods of avoidance, and the celiac genes do not turn off. While antibody levels (like tTG IgA) can normalize on a strict gluten-free diet an...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to TheDHhurts's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,190
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Atl222
    Newest Member
    Atl222
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
    • Scott Adams
      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold; if it’s <0.025 mcg per kilogram, it would be extremely low and well within GF limits. Without the denominator, the result is incomplete. It’s reasonable to follow up with the company and ask them to confirm the result in ppm using a validated method (like ELISA R5)—that’s the standard used to assess gluten safety.
    • Scott Adams
      Medications

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Medication sensitivity is very real for many people with celiac and other autoimmune conditions, and it’s frustrating when that’s brushed off. Even when a medication is technically gluten-free, fillers, dose changes, or how your nervous system reacts—especially with things like gabapentin—can cause paradoxical effects like feeling wired but exhausted. The fact that it helped bloating suggests it may be affecting gut–nerve signaling, which makes sense in the context of SIBO, but that doesn’t mean the side effects should be ignored. You’re carrying a heavy load right now with ongoing skin, eye, and neurological uncertainty, and living in that kind of limbo is exhausting on its own. It’s understandable to feel overwhelmed and discouraged when systems and providers don’t meet you where you are—your experience is valid, and continuing to advocate for yourself, even when it’s hard, really does matter. You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.