Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Clueless-- What's Positive About These Labs?


Avalon451

Recommended Posts

Avalon451 Apprentice

Hi, my family and I are all new to this. DH and I have 3 daughters, 16, 13 and 9. The 16 y.o. was seeing a dermatologist for acne when, as an aside, she showed the doctor "this rash that's driving me nuts" on elbows, knees and back. You guessed it-- dermatitis herpetiformus diagnosed by biopsy. She is now seeing a GI doc at Seattle Children's hosp. It was confirmed by blood test (though I don't yet have a copy of those results) and she's getting an endo next Friday to check the internal damage and biopsy to confirm it (though I know that it's a positive celiac dx with the DH biopsy-- just checking to see what kind of damage she has internally).

Meanwhile! The rest of us got bloodwork done. Mine came back, and also my two younger daughters'. (DH just had his done yesterday, so not back yet.) I am so confused as to what the numbers mean. I have read the linked articles, googled it, tried to find what it is about these tests that are positive. Add in confusing comments by my doctor and my girls' pediatrician, and I really don't know why it's positive.

My doc said (via email) "It's not foolproof but I bet you're celiac. Try the diet." I replied that I'd like a referral to the GI doc and an endoscopy to confirm, he immediately gave me a referral but commented, "I'd hesitate to do the invasive procedure, since you're planning on going gluten-free anyway" But he's really cool with me exploring options for myself. Very supportive and generally knowlegable.

It looks like my test was kind of minimal compared to my daughters' more complete panels. Mine says:

Tissue transglutinase antibody <3

IgA serum 77

Here's my daughters':

13 year old: (comments: R's labs for celiac are positive. Follow up with Children's GI re their recommendations.)

TTG Antibody, IgG <3

TTG Antibody, IgA 31

Endomysial AB Screen NEGATIVE

Gliadin Antibody (IgA) 29

9 year old: (comments: F's lab results positive for a reaction to gluten. Follow up with GI (etc) )

TTG Antibody, IgG <3

TTG Antibody, IgA 33

Endomysial AB Screen POSITIVE

Gliadin Antibody (IgA) 27

So the one whose labs say positive, the comment is "reaction to gluten" and the one who says "negative" says she's celiac. And I don't know what makes my own doc think "I bet you have celiac."

Help interpreting these numbers, please? Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

You didn't include the normal ranges for the labs. Do you have them? Every lab is different.

Yours is a positive TTG test, which is an autoimmune antibody usually caused by celiac. (I'm guessing the <3 is the normal range on the lab slip?) There are other autoimmune diseases that can cause TTG, but with the celiac girls your doctor is making a reasonable assumption that your positive test is also from celiac. He's doing good medicine to diagnose from TTG, your genetics, and a trial of the diet rather than requiring you to get an endoscopy. You can obviously get one from the GI if you want to go that direction.

For the 9-year old, she is celiac. Endomysial AB is an autoimmune antibody only made by folks with celiac and the result is positive. I don't understand the comment either. I wonder if the wrong comments got on the wrong chart? Like a dictation error?

For the 13-year old, is there a normal range on the tests? Is the TTG for her also supposed to be <3 for normal?

Takala Enthusiast

Did the printed results you have there, have a range of numbers, as it can be a different scale used from different labs ?

hypothetical example:

"test result is > greater than 20 on a scale of 1 to 30. 1 to 15 is negative, 16 to 30 is positive" therefore the result for that one test done out of the four tests run, was positive.

The reason your doctor is saying "try the diet" is that if you have 3 kids with positive test results, one with a DH biopsy positive already, they had to be inheriting the genes for this from somebody.... and that would be... you. B)

Avalon451 Apprentice

Thanks for the replies!

The "range" is part of the problem, I think, of what was confusing me.

On mine it says

Your Value Standard Range Units

Tissue Transgluaminase Antibody <3 U/mL

Reference range:

Negative <5

Equivocal: 5-8

Postive: >8

IgA Serum 77 80-463 mg/dL

So it looks to me like I was negative for TTG. And that the IgA serum was just below normal (meaning... what?)

On my daughters: no range given. I mean, it says "range" but underneath that for each of the tests it just says (U/mL), which I think is just the units measured, not the range, right? Weird.

I'm absolutely cool with going gluten-free. I love to cook, and while I know it'll be a challenge, there's so much good info out there. Lots of our favorite foods are gluten-free anyway. I know there'll be times that we are in mourning for the hamburgers from our favorite stand.. but.. we will survive and thrive, and feel better. I will be happy to be free of 7 straight years of diarrhea, for sure.

Love what I'm seeing on this board, too-- such a supportive and info rich community!

Skylark Collaborator

Your TTG test is negative because you have low total IgA. It's not something that affects your health much but it is a risk factor for celiac and means IgA testing will come back false negative. (Can't look for something that isn't there.) You need the IgG version of the celiac panel. Ask if you can get deamidated gliadin IgG too. It's a very sensitive test.

It is confusing that the reference range isn't given on the girls' test. If the girls were tested at the exact same lab as you were, they may both be positive for TTG. Is there a phone number to call on the lab slip to find out if a result >8 is positive?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,194
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Eliana123
    Newest Member
    Eliana123
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.