Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Babies


Phoebe

Recommended Posts

Phoebe Newbie

My daughter (9.5 months old) has a family history of celiac and food allergies. I'm breastfeeding, so we're both currently dairy-free (otherwise she gets eczema) and mostly gluten-free (she doesn't react to traces in my diet, and there aren't any traces in her diet). We started eliminating wheat and oats when she was 5.5 months old (which cleared up the slimy green poop that I think was allergic colitis, and a persistent anal fissure).

She's otherwise healthy - a skinny little monkey (bounces btwn 3rd and 25th percentile weight for height, but she's always been 95th percentile or higher for height), but cheerful and generally well-looking. Her eczema bothered her, but the GI problems didn't seem to make her fussy or otherwise bothered.

Her pediatrician wanted to do bloodwork for celiac at her 6 month well baby visit, but at that point we'd just gotten the green poop and bloody diapers cleared up, and I didn't want to reintroduce gluten at the same time we were introducing solids.

We were going to try barley, then test at 10 months, but 3 days in I discovered that 3 days is about as much barley as one person can eat. (We'd both have to be consuming gluten and both be tested to have any hope of accurate results, and I wanted to make sure she didn't react to barley in my diet before I fed it to her directly.)

Is there any point in testing her sooner, rather than doing dietary challenges at some point and then testing after age 2, to rule out transient gluten intolerance? I'm also playing around with just getting her gene tested, then picking a path based on those results.

Thanks!

Phoebe :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lauradawn Explorer

Our pediatrician said that the blood work is not incredibly accurate until after 3. My boys are 2 and he felt fairly confident the results were accruate but said the younger they are the more inaccruate it wil be. They did not do any testing on my children when they were babies and had symptoms of multiple allergies very similar to your story. One of mine had blood in his stools consisitantly. they did a colonoscopy and determined it was allergic collitis. But it still took experimenting to find out what it was.

  • 1 month later...
dotandevan Newbie

Hi, I have an 11 month old who would get diarrhea after eating wheat, barley, oats. I mentioned this to his dr. and she suggested blood tests (but did not mention he had to be eating gluten for blood tests to be diagnostic). The phlebotomists weren't able to draw blood on him. now I'm wondering what's the point? I'm reading about many people trying various and sometimes invasive diagnostics and never getting a definite answer and I can't imagine putting my son through tests which might not tell us anything, especially since he is perfectly healthy when he is gluten free. Anyone else out there debating doing diagnostics when a gluten-free diet seems to be the answer?

-Dorothy

mat4mel Apprentice

Dorothy,

The only reason I would want to get some diagnostics done-- is because Celiac is a serious disease, meaning that you must adhere to the diet your ENTIRE life. If your son's problem were just a wheat ALLERGY, and it could be, then it is likely he will outgrow the problem. The problem you would face then is, if he truly has Celiac, when he is older he might question the diagnosis, and he might sneak gluten here and there, and it is common for him to have no reaction-- then he will say, well I guess I don't have Celiac! You might then feel relieved that he has seemed to outgrow his "wheat intolerance" or "wheat allergy"...It could then take years for him to start having intestinal symptoms again, meanwhile damaging himself. I think this is the main reason I am driven to get an accurate diagnosis for my kids. I hate the idea of having to reintroduce gluten into their diet when it makes them sick. That is why I am leaning towards stool testing through enterolab. Apparently the antibodies show up in the stool for a while after removing gluten from the diet. It is a very frustrating process I know!! I am going through it right now and ready to pull all of my hair out!

Sorry, don't know if I helped any. About the testing not being very accurate before age 3-- my 2 yr old just tested positive for both IgG and IgA antibodies. I know lots of other kids have tested positive before age 3.

Phoebe, I'm not sure about gene testing-- it seems like there is argument as to whether or not you should avoid gluten if you have genes. I just don't know enough about it, so I'm not the best person to respond. What if there are more than one Celiac gene, and they don't catch it, and so you just assume that she doesn't have it, when she might?

dotandevan Newbie

Thanks for your thoughts. Maybe I'll let him get poked another time and see if they can get any blood. Is the stool test covered by insurance? I'll have to ask his doc about it. I guess it would be much easier to have a simple test done now than have to feed him gluten later on or do a biopsy.

thanks

-Dorothy

mat4mel Apprentice

Hey Dorothy,

I don't know if your insurance will cover Enterolab. I would go look at their website, enterolab.com. Email me if you have any more questions, and I'll see if I can help.

Mel

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      322

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    2. - Known1 replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      20

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      20

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

    4. - HectorConvector replied to HectorConvector's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      322

      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

    5. - Known1 replied to Known1's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      20

      Diagnosed Marsh stage 3C in January 2026

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,591
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAcooks
    Newest Member
    WAcooks
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine Mononitrate is "shelf stable" and won't break down easily when exposed to heat, light and over time.  This makes it very hard for the body to absorb and utilize it.  Only thirty percent is absorbed, less is utilized because it takes additional thiamine to break it down.   Thiamine Hydrochloride is great.  Benfotiamine is wonderful, too.   Retaining water, edema, is a symptom of low thiamine.  I'd bloat up like a puffer fish.   The ingrown toenail problems I had that I attribute to Niacin deficiency and Vitamin C deficiency.  My toenails curled in and grew thick and yellow, thickened heels.  It was awful.   So glad you're going to give thiamine hydrochloride a try!   Let me know how it goes.  You may feel worse before you feel better, the thiamine paradox, but it does clear up.  It's like a car back firing if it hasn't been run for a while.   Thiamine and benfotiamine: Focus on their therapeutic potential https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/
    • Known1
      Thanks again, I'll keep pressing on.  🤞
    • knitty kitty
      @Known1, Search for "niacin flush fades the longer you use it" and "Niacin flush worse if deficient".   It takes a couple to three weeks for the body to adjust and you're at that point now, so things should improve. Riboflavin makes the neon color, which glows under black light.  If not absorbed, excreted.  Absorption of riboflavin will improve as the body starts healing the intestinal lining and villi grow back.   You could skip the multivitamin instead.  
    • HectorConvector
      The conversion factor for mg/dl and mmol/L is 18. So 5 = 90, 7 = 126, and so on. In the US, blood sugar regulations now are the same as what we use in the UK except for this difference in units. In terms of how they compare in the past, the numbers today that I quoted are stricter than they used to be. Blood sugar numbers for +1 and +2 hour postprandial are measured from the beginning of a meal in these official numbers. In regards to the thiamin supplement I have: it says it is thiamine mononitrate. I had not until now been aware there were different types (it seems I find that is the case with everything, including the magnesium I take!) and this one I have is the only one available in my local stores. I know it makes my pee smell strong when I take it which would seem to indicate my body is absorbing enough that the remainder gets ejected, but I could be wrong. Of course, I'm willing to try anything reasonable to correct this long standing condition, whatever it might be so I will try and get thiamin hydrochloride. Back on the note of diabetes (potentially) I haven't had the blood test for a while and I did notice ingrown toenail type infections a few times in the last 3 years that kept coming back. I heard that diabetes caused high urination. But eating sugar and elevated blood sugar causes the opposite in me. If I eat a lot of sugar I retain water, like big time. If I ate a bunch o sugar in the afternoon say, I can produce little enough urine that I can go over 12 hours and have nowhere near enough urine to need to void in that time or longer which seems abnormal.       
    • Known1
      @knitty kitty For me, the flushing lasts about 10 hours and not just 60-90 minutes after consuming the vitamins.  I am 10-days into taking this already.  My urine is neon colored around the clock and I drink between 1/2 to 3/4 of a gallon of water per day.  I'll stick with 2 a day for now, but am honestly quite hesitant to do so. I am curious, where are you reading "the worse the flush, the more your body needs the niacin"?  I have been searching for that, but haven't found that anywhere.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.