Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Babies


Phoebe

Recommended Posts

Phoebe Newbie

My daughter (9.5 months old) has a family history of celiac and food allergies. I'm breastfeeding, so we're both currently dairy-free (otherwise she gets eczema) and mostly gluten-free (she doesn't react to traces in my diet, and there aren't any traces in her diet). We started eliminating wheat and oats when she was 5.5 months old (which cleared up the slimy green poop that I think was allergic colitis, and a persistent anal fissure).

She's otherwise healthy - a skinny little monkey (bounces btwn 3rd and 25th percentile weight for height, but she's always been 95th percentile or higher for height), but cheerful and generally well-looking. Her eczema bothered her, but the GI problems didn't seem to make her fussy or otherwise bothered.

Her pediatrician wanted to do bloodwork for celiac at her 6 month well baby visit, but at that point we'd just gotten the green poop and bloody diapers cleared up, and I didn't want to reintroduce gluten at the same time we were introducing solids.

We were going to try barley, then test at 10 months, but 3 days in I discovered that 3 days is about as much barley as one person can eat. (We'd both have to be consuming gluten and both be tested to have any hope of accurate results, and I wanted to make sure she didn't react to barley in my diet before I fed it to her directly.)

Is there any point in testing her sooner, rather than doing dietary challenges at some point and then testing after age 2, to rule out transient gluten intolerance? I'm also playing around with just getting her gene tested, then picking a path based on those results.

Thanks!

Phoebe :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lauradawn Explorer

Our pediatrician said that the blood work is not incredibly accurate until after 3. My boys are 2 and he felt fairly confident the results were accruate but said the younger they are the more inaccruate it wil be. They did not do any testing on my children when they were babies and had symptoms of multiple allergies very similar to your story. One of mine had blood in his stools consisitantly. they did a colonoscopy and determined it was allergic collitis. But it still took experimenting to find out what it was.

  • 1 month later...
dotandevan Newbie

Hi, I have an 11 month old who would get diarrhea after eating wheat, barley, oats. I mentioned this to his dr. and she suggested blood tests (but did not mention he had to be eating gluten for blood tests to be diagnostic). The phlebotomists weren't able to draw blood on him. now I'm wondering what's the point? I'm reading about many people trying various and sometimes invasive diagnostics and never getting a definite answer and I can't imagine putting my son through tests which might not tell us anything, especially since he is perfectly healthy when he is gluten free. Anyone else out there debating doing diagnostics when a gluten-free diet seems to be the answer?

-Dorothy

mat4mel Apprentice

Dorothy,

The only reason I would want to get some diagnostics done-- is because Celiac is a serious disease, meaning that you must adhere to the diet your ENTIRE life. If your son's problem were just a wheat ALLERGY, and it could be, then it is likely he will outgrow the problem. The problem you would face then is, if he truly has Celiac, when he is older he might question the diagnosis, and he might sneak gluten here and there, and it is common for him to have no reaction-- then he will say, well I guess I don't have Celiac! You might then feel relieved that he has seemed to outgrow his "wheat intolerance" or "wheat allergy"...It could then take years for him to start having intestinal symptoms again, meanwhile damaging himself. I think this is the main reason I am driven to get an accurate diagnosis for my kids. I hate the idea of having to reintroduce gluten into their diet when it makes them sick. That is why I am leaning towards stool testing through enterolab. Apparently the antibodies show up in the stool for a while after removing gluten from the diet. It is a very frustrating process I know!! I am going through it right now and ready to pull all of my hair out!

Sorry, don't know if I helped any. About the testing not being very accurate before age 3-- my 2 yr old just tested positive for both IgG and IgA antibodies. I know lots of other kids have tested positive before age 3.

Phoebe, I'm not sure about gene testing-- it seems like there is argument as to whether or not you should avoid gluten if you have genes. I just don't know enough about it, so I'm not the best person to respond. What if there are more than one Celiac gene, and they don't catch it, and so you just assume that she doesn't have it, when she might?

dotandevan Newbie

Thanks for your thoughts. Maybe I'll let him get poked another time and see if they can get any blood. Is the stool test covered by insurance? I'll have to ask his doc about it. I guess it would be much easier to have a simple test done now than have to feed him gluten later on or do a biopsy.

thanks

-Dorothy

mat4mel Apprentice

Hey Dorothy,

I don't know if your insurance will cover Enterolab. I would go look at their website, enterolab.com. Email me if you have any more questions, and I'll see if I can help.

Mel

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,378
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EleanorGray
    Newest Member
    EleanorGray
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      A friend of mine is in the bar trade most of his life and has never heard of lines being mixed for different type of beers and ciders. Better to stick with cans.
    • Rejoicephd
      Thanks very much for confirming my suspicion @Scott Adams! That helps a lot because I'm really trying to track down and get rid of these sources of cross-contact and so I'm going to just rule out the draft ciders and hope that helps. Also @Rogol72 its nice to hear you haven't had a problem on that side of the pond - draft cider lines being used for cider only certainly sounds like the right way to do it, but I think that must not always be practiced over here! 
    • Zuma888
      I didn't ask a doctor about this actually. I did ask several doctors a long time ago and they told me gluten has nothing to do with hashimoto's. One of them told me to do a gluten challenge to test for celiac, but at the time I was in graduate school so couldn't afford to be even more ill than I was. If you have the symptoms, I really don't advise you to do a gluten challenge. It messed me up mentally and physically for months. At the same time, I benefitted from doing the challenge in the sense that it convinced me that all my symptoms were truly from gluten - even stuff like insomnia! So now I am terrified to eat gluten, whereas before I would have a little once in a while and not notice anything dramatic. 
    • Winnie-Ther-Pooh
      I am in a similar situation where I can't feasibly do a gluten challenge but have all the symptoms and I have 2 celiac genes. I'm curious if your doctor advised you to eat as if you had a diagnosis or if they were more dismissive about it. 
    • Zuma888
      Negative, although I had most of the symptoms of celiac disease. I now eat as if I had a diagnosis.
×
×
  • Create New...