Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does Dh 100% Mean Celiac?


phil1

Recommended Posts

phil1 Apprentice

I tested negative for celiac 6 years ago, but since have cut out gluten and felt much better (still have lots of problems though). My sister cut out gluten, too, and no longer has any problems. I have DH and it was a lot worse when I was eating gluten, but I still have it. I'm seeing a doc on Friday, a celiac specialist, and I'm hoping that he can confirm that I have celiac based on my DH and dispite my negative test results from years ago. I refuse to eat gluten for 3 months or how ever long it is for regular celiac tests. Can he diagnose celiac by diagnosing DH? I'm afraid that he's going to assume that I don't have celiac based on my previous test, and I'm pretty damn sure that I have it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

My understanding is that a diagnosis of Dermatitis Herpetiformis is absolute confirmation of celiac disease. The treatment is the same: a gluten-free diet for life.

If your DH persists, look for possible gluten sources that you have missed.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

If you are seeing a Celiac specialist he should know the nuances of dh.

Testing may be problematic if you are gluten-free because even dh testing depends on finding IgA antibodies-which fall even while dh remains active when you are on a gluten-free diet.

You may get lucky and be dxed based on visual inspection and symptoms and history. It's worth a try.

You should look into a low iodine diet, as well as intolerances like salicylates. Those can keep dh active even on a gluten-free diet.

eatmeat4good Enthusiast

Iodine can keep the DH active.

I didn't heal until I eliminated all traces of gluten and went low iodine.

It took me 14 months to get healed. As Peter says, look for traces of gluten. I missed several things and was always surprised at what a violent reaction my DH would have even to low level trace glutening.

See thyca.com for a low iodine diet. (it is not a no-iodine diet)

We do need a certain amount of iodine but limiting it is sometimes necessary for the healing of DH.

DH is Celiac. A skin biopsy can diagnose it but it is not always positive even if it is DH. As Prickly pear says if you are gluten free the chances of testing positive go down. My Dr. gave me the diagnosis based on observing the rash and my repeated reports of glutening triggering the reaction again and another round of painful itchy sores. It took 3 years of treating it for impetigo, fungus, anti-virals, bacteria, acne, neurotic excoriation, until the day I stumbled here and realized it was DH and the cause was gluten. By verbal report of healing on going gluten free and the Dr. observing the healing...I was diagnosed. For some reason my rash is also sensitive to salicylates. I often took ibuprofen for the pain and itching and inflammation of DH. On reading I learning that many with DH are particularly sensitive to NSAIDS and they should not be used by those with DH. Just some tips. Hopefully the specialist will help you. Good luck.

itchy Rookie

I tested negative for coeliac for many years.

I was finally able to convince a dematologist that I had DH, though paradoxically he refused to give me a formal diagnosis without me eating gluten for a while and having my skin biopsied. Needless to say, I refused to torture myself that way.

I suspect many physicians and dematologists will also refuse a formal diagnosis. (I hope anyone with opposite experience will post) So far I haven't needed a formal diagnosis for anything though I can see that it might be important at some time. A medical insurance company was quite willing to believe me when I said I had DH in order to turn me down for coverage of that condition, but I suspect that if I had made an insurance claim earlier they would have refused without a formal diagnosis.

Fortunately I live in Canada, so only need insurance for travel.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.