Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can't Get A Real Diagnosis

Laury

Recommended Posts

Laury Newbie
Laury
Posted

After having stomach problems for at least 12 years, I have finally figured out I have problems with Gluten. I went on a diet to lose weight in July of 2011 and I felt great. I thought it was because I wasn't eating popcorn anymore. As the diet went on I started adding back in carbs and found my stomach pain was back as soon as I ate anything with gluten in it. I took gluten out of my diet again and felt great. In January I had blood tests done that were negative due to my gluten free diet.

I had the following blood tests in January 2012

Tissue Transglutaminase antibody IGA 3

Immunoglobulin A Gliadin antibody IGA 42L

Vitamin D 11

In March I ate Gluten for 2 weeks and then had a endoscope biopsy done that showed inflamation but no villi damage. I tested positive for HLA Dq2. The doctor decided that I would have to eat gluten for 1-2 months and redo the endoscope to get a real diagnosis. He feels confident in assuming I have Celiac due to the various tests and the fact that I feel better on a gluten free diet.

Symptoms:

Fatigue

gas pains

abdomen distension

My question is: I'm wondering if it is worth going thru the month or two of pain so I can have a real diagnosis. I would like to know if it is really Celiac or if I am gluten intolerant. Has anyone else been thru this?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


icm Apprentice
icm
Posted

You didn't specify the normal range of the blood test values.

We were encouraged to go through this 11 years back but both Mum and I refused to follow our gastroenterologist's advice. Turns out we both possess the celiac gene (my mum a double copy) and also showed a positive response to the gluten free diet. My aunt developed type 1 diabetes at 9 years of age in the 70's and also had gluten induced autoimmunity (when tested via Enterolab 8 years ago). She had NO symptoms.

I would say it's time to stick to the gluten free diet seeing as though you know eating gluten makes you sick. You also have a celiac gene, along with inflammation in your intestines.

There are dangers associated with reintroducing gluten after going gluten free. Dr. Vikki Petersen highlights some of these below.

Open Original Shared Link

MitziG Enthusiast
MitziG
Posted

With inflammation showing up after a short return to gluten, that seems to point to celiac, as does the low IGA and vit D. Low IGA is a red flag. Personally, I wouldn't make myself sick just to get the dx. Your dr sounds fairly reasonable, and I would just call yourself a celiac and go with it. I would however get any immediate family tested before THEY try the diet.

Oscar Apprentice
Oscar
Posted
Dr. Vikki Petersen highlights some of these...

Dr. Vikki Petersen is not what I would call a credible source. She certainly has an agenda she is pursuing. When I have problems with my digestion, I *ALWAYS* consult with a chiropractor--Not! :rolleyes:

tom Contributor
tom
Posted

Dr. Vikki Petersen is not what I would call a credible source. She certainly has an agenda she is pursuing. ...

...

Well Oscar, I'm not sure what "agenda" you could be referring to, beyond helping ppl whose problems aren't solved by their PCP's & GI's mainstream medical thought processes.

Don't we see ppl on the forums every day who've been failed by their MDs?

"IBS, here's a rest-of-your-life daily pill"

"You're fine, but should maybe see a therapist"

"Can't be celiac, you're not wasting away w/ constant D"

The only agenda I get from them is in trying to fill a gap in conventional medicine, and helping the ppl whose MDs can't or won't help them get healthy.

I should probably mention that I was a patient at their (Drs Rick & Vikki Peterson) Sunnyvale, CA facility and am more than a little familiar w/ what they do & who they really are.

If I'd been lucky enough to go to them early on in my tale of unhealthy woe, I may have been able to completely avoid the worst 7 yrs of my life. Would probably even still own my home. (pffft! I still say "my")

On the notion of credibility, the celiac.com resident expert/author Ron Hoggan appears to disagree w/ your assessment.

The information contained in The Gluten Effect is very valuable and the interpretation of the research is unusually insightful. The authors have also melded a large array of apparently disparate information into a cohesive body of helpful information. The detailed examination of gluten

Gemini Experienced
Gemini
Posted

After having stomach problems for at least 12 years, I have finally figured out I have problems with Gluten. I went on a diet to lose weight in July of 2011 and I felt great. I thought it was because I wasn't eating popcorn anymore. As the diet went on I started adding back in carbs and found my stomach pain was back as soon as I ate anything with gluten in it. I took gluten out of my diet again and felt great. In January I had blood tests done that were negative due to my gluten free diet.

I had the following blood tests in January 2012

Tissue Transglutaminase antibody IGA 3

Immunoglobulin A Gliadin antibody IGA 42L

Vitamin D 11

In March I ate Gluten for 2 weeks and then had a endoscope biopsy done that showed inflamation but no villi damage. I tested positive for HLA Dq2. The doctor decided that I would have to eat gluten for 1-2 months and redo the endoscope to get a real diagnosis. He feels confident in assuming I have Celiac due to the various tests and the fact that I feel better on a gluten free diet.

Symptoms:

Fatigue

gas pains

abdomen distension

My question is: I'm wondering if it is worth going thru the month or two of pain so I can have a real diagnosis. I would like to know if it is really Celiac or if I am gluten intolerant. Has anyone else been thru this?

What is this business with a "real" diagnosis? Why do people think that if you don't have a biopsy slide to show damage, you don't have a diagnosis? You have done a dietary trial with good results and, most important of all, you have the main Celiac gene, which can predispose you to Celiac. You may have it or it may be non-Celiac gluten intolerance but what difference does it make? You have proven you cannot eat gluten by the trial you did. I think having a positive gene test should be enough, along with your symptoms. Your doctor may never find damage, if it's patchy.

It could very well be that you have latent Celiac or you haven't triggered long enough for it to cause all the damage but please do not wait for that to happen or you could end up really sick, like I did. I nearly died and I never want to go there again. I did have positive blood work, positive gene testing and the fact I was down to 97 pounds was all I needed to know I should dump gluten from my diet. I have never been better and you will too!

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

What, exactly, is a "real diagnosis"? And more importantly, why do you care? Make sure you haven't unconsciously bought into a system where every ailment needs a label to make it real before you go make yourself sick for nothing. Our healthcare system has inadvertently brainwashed patients into thinking they need a "real diagnosis", even when they know what's wrong and can cure themselves. Your "real diagnosis" is that you can't eat gluten becasue it makes you sick.

I think we do a lot of damage on this board by making a strong distinction between celiac and NCGI. It's great if you can get tested before you go gluten-free, but I think there is too much emphasis on challenge for people who figure out gluten issues themselves. If gluten makes you so sick that you don't want to challenge, and you have recovered your health to the point where you don't need a doctor gluten-free, that tells you a lot more than test results ever will!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


beachbirdie Contributor
beachbirdie
Posted

After having stomach problems for at least 12 years, I have finally figured out I have problems with Gluten. I went on a diet to lose weight in July of 2011 and I felt great. I thought it was because I wasn't eating popcorn anymore. As the diet went on I started adding back in carbs and found my stomach pain was back as soon as I ate anything with gluten in it. I took gluten out of my diet again and felt great. In January I had blood tests done that were negative due to my gluten free diet.

I had the following blood tests in January 2012

Tissue Transglutaminase antibody IGA 3

Immunoglobulin A Gliadin antibody IGA 42L

Vitamin D 11

In March I ate Gluten for 2 weeks and then had a endoscope biopsy done that showed inflamation but no villi damage. I tested positive for HLA Dq2. The doctor decided that I would have to eat gluten for 1-2 months and redo the endoscope to get a real diagnosis. He feels confident in assuming I have Celiac due to the various tests and the fact that I feel better on a gluten free diet.

Symptoms:

Fatigue

gas pains

abdomen distension

My question is: I'm wondering if it is worth going thru the month or two of pain so I can have a real diagnosis. I would like to know if it is really Celiac or if I am gluten intolerant. Has anyone else been thru this?

I would echo the sentiments of those who have questioned the need for "official" diagnosis. You have antibodies, you have a doctor who says he is reasonably confident it IS celiac, you feel better gluten free.

Unless you live somewhere that subsidizes gluten free food, you will probably do just as well with or without that diagnosis.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.