Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Indulge Me; What Was It Like To Be Gluten Free Back Then?


catsmeow

Recommended Posts

catsmeow Contributor

I was curious to hear your experiences of being gluten free prior to the explosion of gluten-free products. I arrived on the scene post explosion, and even though the transition was hard, I am positive that is wasn't even close to being as difficult as it was back then. My symptoms started in 1999, and reached full blown illness by 2002, but of course, it took till 2010 to get properly diagnosed. I ponder what it would have been like to be diagnosed right away.....back then..

I remember in the 90's, I had a problem with my water well. The well guy came to work on it. He was there for hours and I thought he must be getting hungry, so I offered this very thin, pale man some peanut butter crackers. He quickly and gruffly told me he had Celiac's disease and could not eat wheat, rye or barley for life. I remember being embarrassed for asking him he wanted crackers, and we said no more about the subject. Yet, I thought of him for the longest time because as a person who baked and cooked a lot, I understood the ramifications of what he had, even though I had never heard of it before that day, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized how tough his life must be. It's so ironic that several years later, I had become gluten intolerant with a wheat allergy to boot...and was in the same situation as the well guy.

.....so I ask again veterans, what was it like for you? How about you vets who have been at this for a lifetime? Do we have anyone who has been gluten free for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

11 years. To me, the hardest part was that wheat didn't have to be listed until 2006, and very few companies listed ingredients online or had gluten-free lists online, so I spent much more time calling companies about ingredients. Virtually no restaurants where I live had heard of being gluten free. None of my friends knew what the heck I was talking about. I educated a lot of people.

Not only were there many fewer specialty items, but most didn't taste as good and "regular" grocery stores here carried almost none of them (I think Kroger had pasta), so you spent time trying to find natural foods stores or you HAD to order online.

richard

bartfull Rising Star

I'm fairly new at it, but my Mom was diagnosed back in 1985. Mom was always a phenomenal cook. When she was diagnosed her doctor told her, "You'll never be able to do it." (He was the only doctor, after years of Mom being sick, who even thought of cleiac, but that was the ONLY thing this jerk ever got right.)

My Dad had asthma and was allergic to preservatives in food so they already had an organic garden and Mom made EVERYTHING from scratch. It wasn't that hard for Mom. She even made her own condiments for Dad, and although she stopped making lazagna, she started making the best eggplant parm I ever tasted.

Mom never developed secondary intolerances so she made cornbread for herself (and the family). Other than that, she always used whole foods anyway.

The difficult part for Mom? When she would go to potlucks and only eat her own food. She would tell people about her celiac, and she would get remarks like, "That's ridiculous!" (I was there to hear that one and I wanted to deck that "lady"!) A lot of the women would say things like, "What's the matter, our food isn't good enough for you?" No matter what she said, none of them understood, and they were all already jealous because Mom was such a good cook. I wonder sometimes if any of those women remember how they treated Mom now that celiac is in the news and they know it's real. I wonder if they are sorry. I hope so.

catsmeow Contributor

Wow Richard, I never even thought about the whole labeling thing. That must have been so tough. I'm so glad that labeling is getting better, and there is more awareness, but still not a lot. People still think I mean glucose, and that I am diabetic...LOL

Bart, your poor mom. I would have wanted to deck someone who would dare say "that's ridiculous" How awful!!!! I just want to give your mama a hug. I had someone recently say behind my back "aint she a piece of work" in reference to my food issues.....sigh. That really hurt my feelings, especially coming from a know it all gluten free dairy free recipe blogger. Who, is just doing it because she believes it's healthier, but has no clue what it is like to really have a problem..I stopped feeling bad though when I realized that I have to consider the source. A know it all is a know it all, and you can't tell em' anything.

psawyer Proficient

I have been gluten-free for just over twelve years.

There have been major advances in label rules in that time, and many more specialty products have been introduced.

In 2000, there was no gluten-free beer at all. Gluten-free baked products could only be obtained in specialty stores. Today, they are in mainstream supermarkets. There are so many more of them, too.

You still have to read labels all the time, but the list of "may contain gluten" ingredients has shrunk so much. Wheat can no longer be concealed. Rye and oats never hid in the first place. The only pitfall left in the US is flavors that could (but really never do) contain malted barley. In Canada, barley can no longer be hidden--but foods made before August 4th may still be in stores with hidden barley.

Many companies will now fully disclose gluten by naming the grain source. These include (among others) Campbells, ConAgra, General Mills, Kraft, McCormick, and Unilever. These companies own other brands, but look for their name somewhere on the label. If you don't see a gluten grain named, there is no gluten in the product.

beachbirdie Contributor

I'm fairly new to gluten-free living, started exploring a little over a year ago. But one of my dearest friends from high school was diagnosed with celiac back in the days before there was readily available Internet. There was no "online" to order from, and very little available in the stores outside of the vacuum-packed Enjoy-type breads. gluten-free labeling didn't happen.

She ended up eating only fresh whole foods (sound familiar to anyone, LOL?) and not using packaged stuff for much of anything. It was hard work, but she did it!

It is so much easier now. Not perfect, but easier!

  • 2 weeks later...
catsmeow Contributor

Thank you for all the great responses. I sure learned a lot, and feel very fortunate to be gluten free in this day and age and thank those who came before me and paved the way.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristina S
    Newest Member
    Kristina S
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.