Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Deaminated Gliadin Iga Of 45 (0-19) A Yes Or No?


ksue12

Recommended Posts

ksue12 Newbie

I had that test result two years ago, and at the same time was told I did NOT have celiac because the other tests that more specifically represent celiac were negative, along with my biopsy results. Any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Welcome, ksue.

The DGP (deamidated gliadin protein) is the newest test for gluten sensitivity and is considered to be the most specific for celiac disease. You do not have to test positive on all the tests - that is why they run the entire panel. Your DGP was a definite positive.

Your negative biopsy could be due to your doctor not taking enough samples, taking them from the wrong place, or the pathologist not being experienced in reading celiac slides. Do you still have (or can you get) a copy of the pathologist's report and tell us what it said? Sometimes doctors are not very experienced in reading these and don't know what signs to look for. You could have been in the early stages of damage.

GFinDC Veteran

Yep, one positive blood test is all it takes.

ksue12 Newbie

Thanks for both of your replies!

Mushroom, so does this mean I most likely have celiac or gluten intolerance? And, I could not find the results of the biopsy. I think it was in my online chart, but for some reason I can't find it anymore. All I saw on the paper that they handed me when I finished the endoscopy was that some samples were taken from the "postbulbar duodenum", but that the duodenum looked normal during the scope.

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome ksue. :)

Whoever told you you were not a celiac was mistaken. :( Unlike celiac disease, there is no test that will indicate non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI). This food sensitivity is diagnosed by how well you respond to a gluten-free diet. NCGI sufferers will have the same symptoms as celiacs but they will not have the intestinal damage. Your positive test indicates celiac (as far as I can remember).

The duodenum is the upper part of the small intestine where celiac damage usually occurs so they were looking in the correct spot. This damage may or may not be visable during the scope; the biopsy samples often need to be checked under magnification to see the damage. That damage is often spotty so if a small nummber of samples was taken, it could have been missed... sounds like it was.

Good luck with the diet change. There are many helpful people around here to give good advice, look around and ask questions. :) Best wishes.

GottaSki Mentor

Welcome!

I'd add that it is time for another full celiac panel. If you haven't removed gluten at all, you may now have more positive tests.

Good luck to you :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    3. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    4. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      nothing has changed

    5. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.