Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Received -- Endoscopy Or Not?


clafran

Recommended Posts

clafran Rookie

Hi everyone,

I am new to the forum, although I'm not completely new to Celiac/Gluten Intolerance. My mother is Celiac/DH, and was diagnosed about 4 years ago. She has been pushing for all of her children to get tested (2 down, 1 to go) since she is a first-degree relative. (FWIW, Mum is 70, I am 40, female, married).

I had my blood work done a few weeks ago, and I received the results. My family practitioner ordered the tests, even though I am not currently exhibiting any debilitating or outward symptoms -- as far as I can tell. The labs were done through Prometheus, and my printout has the following information:

DGP IgG = Positive (5.9 EU/ml, reference <4.9)

DGP IgA = Negative (4.6 EU/ml, reference <6.1)

TTG IgA = Negative (6.5 U/ml, reference <10.3)

EMA IgA = Positive

Total IgA = 143 mg/dl (reference >44-441 mg/dl)

Prometheus report adds that "Results support a diagnosis of celiac disease," and "Serological markers for celiac disease detected."

My FP was honest enough to tell me he wasn't sure how to interpret the results, and that he would be happy to refer me to a specialist.

I know that a biopsy/endoscopy is generally used to confirm findings, but since I have a first-degree relative with Celiac, and my EMA is positive, do I really need the endo?

Really, I'm in denial. Big time.

Thank you in advance for any advice or support you may be able to offer.

Best,

Cathy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Welcome Cathy!

Your results are a bit confusing - the positive DGP is enough to know something is going on related to gluten ingestion. The positive EMA means there is damage to your small intestine. With family history and two positive antibody tests - that is celiac - in my opinion.

Your total IgA is within normal range, but interestingly in the lower end of normal which is quite similar to everyone in my family - we all test higher on IgG. You are missing the tTG-IgG. I highly suggest getting it run along with nutrient testing if you have not had it done as the malabsorption caused by celiac can be another important piece of the diagnostic puzzle.

The endo is up to you - I vote get it. The reason is this...you have no gastro symptoms - I would guess you may have some other symptoms that you never would think are caused by celiac. If your endoscopic biopsy reveals clear damage it makes it much easier to be fully compliant about removing ALL gluten - at least this was the case in the early days for me as some digestive problems resolved yet my autoimmune symtoms all got worse for a time which could have left me wondering if gluten was really the cause of my symptoms - for me the endo was far worse than my bloodwork. We are all different so read as much as you can and then decide if endoscopy is the next best step for you.

Hang in there :)

clafran Rookie

Welcome Cathy!

Your results are a bit confusing - the positive DGP is enough to know something is going on related to gluten ingestion. The positive EMA means there is damage to your small intestine. With family history and two positive antibody tests - that is celiac - in my opinion.

Your total IgA is within normal range, but interestingly in the lower end of normal which is quite similar to everyone in my family - we all test higher on IgG. You are missing the tTG-IgG. I highly suggest getting it run along with nutrient testing if you have not had it done as the malabsorption caused by celiac can be another important piece of the diagnostic puzzle.

The endo is up to you - I vote get it. The reason is this...you have no gastro symptoms - I would guess you may have some other symptoms that you never would think are caused by celiac. If your endoscopic biopsy reveals clear damage it makes it much easier to be fully compliant about removing ALL gluten - at least this was the case in the early days for me as some digestive problems resolved yet my autoimmune symtoms all got worse for a time which could have left me wondering if gluten was really the cause of my symptoms - for me the endo was far worse than my bloodwork. We are all different so read as much as you can and then decide if endoscopy is the next best step for you.

Hang in there :)

Thanks so much, Lisa. I will have my family doctor refer me to a specialist, and we'll proceed from there. I think you are spot-on with the non-digestive symptoms; my mother feels she has traced the majority of her "other" issues throughout her life (infertility/miscarriage, dental issues, osteoporosis, ad infinitum) to celiac. Worse, she suspects her own father had silent celiac, which ultimately took his life through intestinal cancer. I was 5 when he passed away. Celiac wasn't even a blip on the map in 1977, at least in our neck of the woods (suburban Midwest).

Thanks again. Glad to have found such a welcoming community!

Cathy

Madagascar Rookie

interesting - i had labs done by Prometheus too and mine are almost the opposite of yours. Prometheus said I probably did not have celiac disease, but i'm certain i have it.

They showed my TTG IgA of 1.3u/ml, which is in the less than 10,3u/ml reference range.

however, the exact same blood sample was also tested by PeaceHealth Labs by accident (long story) and the TTG IgA came in at 29. their reference range was <20 none, 20-30 weak positive and >30eu was positive. I have the gene and my doc said with the TTG of 29, that was high enough to be sure. yours is much higher than mine.

i am still wondering if i should get the biopsy done but i've been gluten-free for 2 months and i don't know how quickly you heal.

i wish you the best figuring it all out! like you, i think my family has it on my mom's side, and i am nearly certain that my mom died from complications from it. it's better to know so we can, hopefully, avoid complications from it.

clafran Rookie

interesting - i had labs done by Prometheus too and mine are almost the opposite of yours. Prometheus said I probably did not have celiac disease, but i'm certain i have it.

They showed my TTG IgA of 1.3u/ml, which is in the less than 10,3u/ml reference range.

however, the exact same blood sample was also tested by PeaceHealth Labs by accident (long story) and the TTG IgA came in at 29. their reference range was <20 none, 20-30 weak positive and >30eu was positive. I have the gene and my doc said with the TTG of 29, that was high enough to be sure. yours is much higher than mine.

i am still wondering if i should get the biopsy done but i've been gluten-free for 2 months and i don't know how quickly you heal.

i wish you the best figuring it all out! like you, i think my family has it on my mom's side, and i am nearly certain that my mom died from complications from it. it's better to know so we can, hopefully, avoid complications from it.

Thanks so much! I really appreciate your input. Best of health for you, too!

~Cathy

nvsmom Community Regular

I would say if the endoscopy will help with your denial, then get it done but be aware that there is a chance that they will miss damaged areas if your intestinal damage is not yet excessive. The intestines have a really large surface area so if the damage is patchy, and the endo doesn't take enough samples (or isn't lucky) there is a chance that you'll end up with a negative biopsy.

I had two positive blood tests too, but that was enough for me since I did not want to undergo minor surgery for my own personal reasons. Like Lisa, my intestinal issues resolved fairly quickly on the gluten-free diet, but I ended up with more autoimmune problems after starting the diet; I found out those issues were actually related to other AI issues so I didn't waiver in my resolve to stay gluten-free either.

It really is a personal choice unless you need to do the biopsy to get an "official diagnosis" for health concessions at work or school. Best of luck to you in whatever you decide to do. :)

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

The positive EMA is virtually 100% specific for Celiac. You also have a positive DGP, which is also very specific for Celiac. I would not bother with a biopsy if I were you (but that is just me). Because your mom is Celiac, I would consider yourself diagnosed.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



clafran Rookie

The positive EMA is virtually 100% specific for Celiac. You also have a positive DGP, which is also very specific for Celiac. I would not bother with a biopsy if I were you (but that is just me). Because your mom is Celiac, I would consider yourself diagnosed.

Thank you, thank you, to everyone. I am grateful for everyone's input.

tom Contributor

Haven't seen anyone mention that it can be good, just in general, to let a specialist take a look under the hood, so to speak, since we already know things haven't been well.

I feel better knowing I've got a baseline eval available for future comparison.

Takala Enthusiast

It is a lot easier to be on a gluten free diet all the time, as more people discover that they need to be. B) Humans have existed for tens of thousands of years (or hundreds of thousands... not going to get into the anthropology wars ;) ) in their current form, without ingesting wheat, which is an extremely new foodstuff on the human timeline. By switching over to a more traditional human menu now, "omnivore" or eating what you need, not what the wheatwashed keep pushing as "healthy," you can probably avoid damaging yourself. So worth it. :)

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

Your blood tests very clearly indicate that you have celiac. Being a first degree relative makes it even more certain. Our doctor talked us into getting the endoscopy because it would give them a "baseline" to measure future healing. However, be aware that a negative biopsy does NOT mean you don't have celiac - it just means damage was not found (could be too early, could be missed by the doctor taking samples, could be interpreted incorrectly by lab technician, etc.) Do not take a negative endoscopy as a signal to continue eating gluten. Your blood tests are enough to know you should be gluten free. Some doctors "require" a positive biopsy to give you a diagnosis. My son's biopsy was positive, mine was negative. My blood tests were positive, my symptoms were classic (and all resolved on the gluten free diet) but my diagnosis is "gluten intolerance." It is so obvious that I also have celiac - but no matter, treatment is the same. Gluten free for life.

Seeking2012 Contributor

I agree with what everyone else here has said; you definitely have Celiac and you at this point do have intestinal damage (the EMA result). You don't need an endoscopy to confirm these results.

Seeking2012 Contributor

interesting - i had labs done by Prometheus

They showed my TTG IgA of 1.3u/ml, which is in the less than 10,3u/ml reference range.

however, the exact same blood sample was also tested by PeaceHealth Labs by accident (long story) and the TTG IgA came in at 29. their reference range was <20 none, 20-30 weak positive and >30eu was positive.

How in the world does this level of a mistake happen? How can one lab get such a radically different reading from the same blood sample than another lab? My goodness!

Lisa Mentor

Do look into an endo exam, as was mentioned earlier. With a family history and personal history of digestive disorders/discomfort, it's always good , in the least, get an "inside look" to insure that there are no, more serious issues...or as a baseline test. imho ;)

clafran Rookie

Wow, I am really so very humbled and grateful for all of your responses. I think I'm going to avoid the expense and just go gluten free. I am truly blessed, because my husband insists that once we eliminate the gluten currently in the house (throwing out, donating, etc.), we will go gluten-free. Very curious to see how my kids react: 6 year old boy (with a handful of attention "issues") and 2.5 year old girl.

It hasn't been very difficult. We enjoy natural and whole foods, and we do most of our own cooking anyways. I survived my first post-diagnosis grocery shopping trip, but was a little panicked by the end. We don't eat out very often, but that still concerns me.

On the plus side, I think my mom is happy to have a partner in health. She's not happy I have celiac, but she's relieved that I know and that I can reverse/prevent damage. And now she won't feel quite so left out at family functions -- we'll bring out own stuff, or make things that everyone can eat. My dad, on the other hand, is resistant to the house being totally gluten-free, so we all worry about cross-contamination. She's working on him...

Thanks again, and know that your words have helped me segue into a healthier lifestyle with a minimum of stress!

Cathy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.