Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Home Testing Kits


Guest gillian502

Recommended Posts

Guest gillian502

I've had so much unreliable information from companies lately, that I'd like to have an at-home testing kit for those times when the product I'm using may be suspect. Does anyone know what types of home kits are available and the approximate cost?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wish Newbie

I have never personally used a gluten test kit, but another Celiac I know has and we have discussed them. The kits are manufactured by ELISA technologies and cost $80. Each kit contains materials for 5 individual tests. You can find out a lot more at the ELISA website (Open Original Shared Link).

My opinion on the test kits (and others may disagree) is that they are best for telling you which foods DO contain gluten--that is, if you get any degree of positive result, you know not to consume that food. However, negative results do not necessarily indicate that a food is safe because there is always the chance that you will be testing a candy bar/scoop of ice cream/etc. from a batch made during the shift of more careful workers...it could still be the case that there is contamination in other batches of the same product even though the one sample you tested came back negative. Of course, you can always test the same product repeatedly over the course of time and become more certain of the result, but that gets pretty pricey. This is just my opinion, though...if you think the peace of mind is worth the high cost, then go for it!

Good luck,

Wish

Guest Sibewill

I've tried the kits twice so far and have to agree with Wish. Reason being, that both times it came out inconclusive. By that I mean the closest reading would be no gluten, but it did not conform to any exact result. The first test was on a gluten-free pizza, and the second on Scotch (just really wishfull thinking and I figured it would make a good "control" sample). The results were practically the same visually but as I was told, one was (likely)negative and the other positive. This was told to me when I called the company and was connected to a very helpfull engineer who explained in great detail how the tests work... it made sense at the time but I certainly can't figure it out right now. Basically though, the Scotch was so high in Gluten that it "washed out" the tester. The pizza he explained was in all likelihood safe (which I'm guaranteed by the maker it is). I still have some test kits remaining but at the price and lack of defined results, I am saving them for something realllly important since there is still some risk involved as a function of my not being a lab technician who will operate these extremely sensitive test kits exactly right. They take very small samples (use a food processor to ensure it mixes well) and mix with a tiny amount of liquid which is easy to put too much in and ruin the test. So in my opinion, too much $$$ and not enough accuracy for my likes.

sorry to ramble but I'm a bit under the weather again!

Guest gillian502

Thanks for the replies. My plan was mostly to use them on medications to see if they have any gluten levels in them...the pharmacutical companies never seem able to guartantee it one way or another. But it sounds as if it may not be able to test meds. A little pricey for only 5 test kits, too.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,643
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    James W.
    Newest Member
    James W.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.