Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

FODMAP Diet Versus Specific Carb Diet Question


Kathleen Smith

Recommended Posts

Kathleen Smith Contributor

Hi All, I am researching (or trying) both FODMAP and the Specific Carb Diet b/c I am gluten free a year and still having nausea and constipation. I am getting a breath test done next Monday but all other tests are good.

Which diet is better if you are symptomatic or if you have smaill intestineal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO)??

The FODMAP seems to allow corn, potatoes, sweet potatoes and rice and the Specific Carb Diet doest not??? That seems like a huge difference in diet!!!!

So just wondering peoples thoughts who know more than I do.

As always thank you in advance and I hope you are all feeling well!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kayo Explorer

Hi Kathleen,

I'm following the FODMAP diet and recovering from SIBO. One more day of antibiotics to go. My understanding is that the FODMAP diet starves the SIBO and prevents it from coming back. I feel good on this diet and will continue on it even though my fructose test came back negative. I don't know how anyone follows the SCD. It seems so restrictive and limiting. I suppose I would do it if I needed to but luckily the FODMAP diet is working.

Here are the best resources I found on FODMAP:

Book - "IBS - Free at Last!" by Patsy Catsos

Yahoo group - Open Original Shared Link

Good luck!

  • 1 year later...
Gutsy Girl Rookie

Kathleen and Kayo,

I was wondering the same thing. I have celiac and SIBO.

I wonder if perhaps one type of bacteria - the main classifications I know about are hydrogen versus methane producing bacteria - tends to have different preferences so that folks who have methane bacteria do better on SCD and folks who have hydrogen bacteria do better on FODMAP, for example? Just wondering. I have absolutely no idea.

But I too am comparing these two diets to start myself, and was noticing how they are almost opposite each other.

Takala Enthusiast

?????? Which diet is better if you are symptomatic of what? "still having" sounds more like there is hidden gluten in the diet.

Both FODMAPS and SCD are restrictive, but FODMAPS wins hands down for the number of ridiculous things that must be eliminated in terms of fruits and vegetables. I did a modified SCD diet in the beginning for a few years, which is easy IF you are getting good results, because it is much more likely to be truly gluten free and not as likely to be cross contaminated. I had a lot of trouble finding a benign form of yogurt, a SCD staple, that wasn't full of lactose, or thickened with starch, and therefore didn't do dairy for a while, then gradually tried adding back in cheese, which worked. From this SCD experience, it was easy for me to see that my actual problem was grain- based. Slowly I added back in other forms of carbohydrates that were not grain, successfully, such as legumes (dried beans, for example, cooked & rinsed so they were not starchy.) As long as they were not cross contaminated, I didn't have a problem. When adding a new food, it should be done one at a time, not all at once. Some of the FODMAPS lists I am seeing for "safe" foods include SPELT, which is WHEAT and NOT GLUTEN FREE.

People spend a lot of time & effort messing around with other diet variations, eliminating a lot of perfectly good foods, when they are instead needing to be strictly gluten free and, if necessary, figure out what other foods on a gluten free diet do not agree with them. The FODMAPS diet lists avoid a lot of artificial sweeteners that bother almost everybody... this is a no brainer. But you are trying to eat for celiac/gluten intolerance.

These tend to be milk and soy, for celiacs. And then one or more of the alternative, gluten-free grain products.

Celiac tends to cause thyroid problems and therefore a side effect may be insulin resistance.... any low or no sugar, low carb, high protein diet will go better with a slow thyroid. Soy is also notorious for not being compatible with thyroid problems.

The part of the intestinal lining that processes milk/dairy is also damaged in celiac, so giving up dairy, at least temporarily, to see what happens is one of the most common ways to find out if that is a problem. Then non lactose dairy, such as gluten-free yogurt or hard, aged cheeses, can be reintroduced and seen if that is a problem, as well. If dairy is a problem, it has to go. If lactose is a problem, it has to go. Just like gluten. No amount of giving up a long list of other fruits and vegetables will "fix" this.

When I do baking now, I am still using a lot of nut meals, (non soy) bean flours, potato flours, seed meals, because I am not very good with a lot of grains. The most exasperating thing I'm encountering is random cross contamination for staple food items. I know I can eat fresh corn, for example, but other forms of corn grains, even "gluten free," seem to be a cc minefield, and I am familiar enough with my symptoms I can tell it is low gluten exposure. I might be an oat reactor, and the latest studies (2011) explain that as there are certain varieties/cultivars of oats that celiac/gluten intolerant people will react to anyway, even if they are certified gluten free. Others are okay. That would explain a lot if a manufacturer was running corn and oats thru the same facility. Oh, and there are a lot of manufacturers using the same lines to run "gluten free," and wheat foods.... NOT GOOD.

Other times, from what I am reading, certain gluten-free grains, like millet, are much more likely to be cross contaminated than others, when samples have been tested. There is another thread going now where a lot of people say they are having a non gluten but a reaction to it, anyway. We're all not meant to eat everything, obviously. But is it the "chicken, or the egg?"

Anytime I get into trouble, I can go back onto my version of a modified SCD diet, and get myself back on track within a day. But it is just to get things sorted out, not permanent.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.