No popular authors found.

Categories

No categories found.


Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!






Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts

SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

"Non-Celiacs" Benefit from Gluten-free Diet

Celiac.com 04/14/2009 - A team of Finnish researchers is calling for a change in the criteria for diagnosing celiac disease, based on their findings that gluten intolerant patients who do not have clinical celiac disease get similar benefits from a gluten-free diet, and respond to the diet about as well as patients who do have clinical celiac disease.

The research team recently set out to test their hypothesis that patients who showed only mild enteropathy, but positive endomysial anti-bodies, would benefit from a gluten-free diet in a manner similar to patients with more serious mucosal damage.

The research team was made up of Kalle Kurppa, Pekka Collin, Mervi Viljamaa, Katri Haimila, Päivi Saavalainen, Jukka Partanen, Kaija Laurila, Heini Huhtala, Kaija Paasikivi, Markku Mäki, and Katri Kaukinen, and they are variously associated with Finland's University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, the Tampere School of Public Health, the Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, and the University of Helsinki.

Among their findings are that patients with endomysial antibodies benefit from a gluten-free diet REGARDLESS of the level of intestinal tissue damage. That means that folks who have no symptoms whatsoever, but who have blood antibodies that are reacting to offending gluten proteins, should consider the benefits of a gluten-free diet. Moreover, it's likely that damage will eventually occur over time without a gluten-free diet.

The current diagnostic criteria for celiac disease require the presence of small-bowel mucosal villous atrophy with crypt hyperplasia (Marsh III). So, no damage of this specific kind, no celiac disease, no gluten-free diet, no worries. Such has been the common medical practice up to the present.

However, in many cases, damage to the intestine develops slowly over time. Also, most patients show some kind of clinical symptoms long before histologic changes show up. Endomysial antibodies happen to be strong and specific predictors of pending damage in the form of villous atrophy.

To test their hypothesis, the research team performed small-bowel endoscopies, along with clinical evaluations, on 70 adults with positive endomysial antibodies. Of these, 23 showed only mild enteropathy (Marsh I–II). Researchers assigned members of this group to either gluten-free or gluten-inclusive diets at random.

After 1 year, the team repeated all clinical, serologic, and histologic tests. A total of 47 participants showed small-bowel mucosal lesions consistent with celiac disease (Marsh III), and this group served as a control for the study.

The results for the group that continued to consume gluten showed damage to the mucosal villous architecture in all cases, along with persistent symptoms and abnormal antibody levels.

In contrast, the gluten-free group showed less damage, generally Marsh I–II, a retreat of symptoms, reduced antibody levels along with reductions in mucosal inflammation similar to controls (Marsh III).

The team concluded that a gluten-free diet provides similar benefits for gluten intolerant patients without clinical celiac disease as for those with celiac disease, that the diagnostic criteria for celiac disease warrant re-evaluation,  that the presence of endomysial antibodies without mucosal damage should be included in chain of genetic gluten intolerance, and and finally that such cases merit treatment with gluten-free diet.


GASTROENTEROLOGY 2009;136:816–823

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).



Related Articles




Spread The Word





4 Responses:

 
Mrs Anne Brinicombe
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
20 Apr 2009 11:28:09 PM PST
I am delighted with these findings. I realized that I was gluten intolerant or coeliac 10 years ago and put myself on a gluten free diet. I since realized I should have waited for a diagnosis. My consultant says I can't have a diagnosis without making myself ill again. He suggests I just persist with the diet. However, without a diagnosis I have no access to the benefits. After inadvertently eating gluten on holiday I have several symptoms and my dermatitis has returned. I will be very interested to follow your research and would be happy to be part of a research group.

 
Kristy
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
16 Jan 2013 10:23:35 AM PST
No citations...too bad. Can't seem to find related article from team of researchers you mentioned either. Not highly credible without citations (you know that!)

 
Gryphon
( Author)
said this on
16 Jan 2013 3:33:27 PM PST
The study is cited as a source at the end of the article. Here is a link to it, since you seem to have trouble finding it: http://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(08)02070-2/abstract

 
crystal

said this on
05 Jun 2014 10:30:57 AM PST
If you have had extensive GI surgery to include partial gastrectomy, how would gluten free benefit your digestion, etc?




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *: